Abstract
Previous research has produced conflicting results regarding the effects of component duration on interactions in multiple schedules. In Experiment 1, potential sources of this conflict were evaluated. Both the effects of absolute reinforcement rate and carry-over effects (hysteresis) from a preceding condition were isolated. When 10-sec components were used, the sensitivity of relative response rate to relative reinforcement rate was affected very little by hysteresis effects and absolute reinforcement rate, but it was systematically reduced as a function of the number of prior conditions. Sensitivity to relative reinforcement rate was also substantially higher with the 10-sec components than with 2-min components. In Experiment 2, this effect of component duration was decomposed into two separate effects. Contrast effects during presentation of a target component with a constant reinforcement rate were greater the shorter the target component was itself; but they were smaller the shorter the alternative component in which reinforcement rate was varied. The latter effect was smaller and more unreliable across subjects. The existence of these two separate effects demonstrates that the usual method of studying component duration—that is, holding all components equal in duration—systematically causes underestimation of the effects of the component duration, and obscures the different processes controlling the two effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baum, W. M. (1974). Chained concurrent schedules: Reinforcement as situation transition.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,22, 91–101.
Catania, A. C., &Reynolds, G. S. (1968). A quantitative analysis of responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 327–383.
Charman, L., &Davison, M. (1982). On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,37, 417–439.
Davison, M. C., &Hunter, I. W. (1979). Concurrent schedules: Undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,32, 233–244.
Ettinger, R. H., &Staddon, J. E. R. (1982). Behavioral competition, component duration and multiple-schedule contrast.Behaviour Analysis Letters,2, 31–38.
Fleshler, M., &Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,5, 529–530.
Hinson, J. M., Malone, J. C., Jr.,McNally, K., &Rowe, D. (1978). Effects of component length and of the transitions among components in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 3–16.
Hinson, J. M., &Staddon, J. E. R. (1981). Some properties of local contrast.Behaviour Analysis Letters,1, 275–281.
McLean, A. P., &White, K. G. (1983). Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,39, 405–426.
McSweeney, F. K. (1982). Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,37, 281–293.
McSweeney, F. K., Farmer, V. A., Dougan, J. D., &Whipple, J. E. (1986). The generalized matching law as a description of multiple-schedule responding.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,45, 83–101.
Schwartz, B. (1978). Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 297–308.
Shimp, C. P., &Wheatley, K. L. (1971). Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,15, 205–210.
Spealman, R. D. (1976). Interactions in multiple schedules: The role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,26, 79–93.
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law.Psychological Review,64, 153–181.
Todorov, J. C. (1972). Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,17, 45–49.
Todorov, J. C., Castro, J., Hanna, E., Bittencourt de Sa, M., &Barreto, M. (1983). Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,40, 99–111.
White, K. G., Pipe, M.-E., McLean, A. P., &Redman, S. (1985). Temporal proximity and reinforcement sensitivity in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,44, 207–215.
Williams, B. A. (1979). Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 379–396.
Williams, B. A. (1980). Contrast, signaled reinforcement, and the relative law of effect.American Journal of Psychology,93, 617–629.
Williams, B. A. (1981). The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,35, 293–310.
Williams, B. A. (1983a). Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,39, 345–384.
Williams, B. A. (1983b). Overmatching in multiple schedules.Behaviour Analysis Letters,3, 171–182.
Williams, B. A. (1988). The effects of stimulus similarity on different types of behavioral contrast.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 206–216.
Williams, B. A., &Fantino, E. (1978). Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 77–86.
Williams, B. A., &Wixted, J. T. (1986). An equation for behavioral contrast.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,45, 47–62.
Wilton, R. N., &Clements, R. O. (1971). Behavioral contrast as a function of the duration of an immediately preceding period of extinction.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,16, 425–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS84-08878 and NIMH Grant I ROI MH42797.
Data for individual subjects from individual conditions are also available from the author upon request.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, B.A. Component duration effects in multiple schedules. Animal Learning & Behavior 17, 223–233 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207638
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207638