Skip to main content

Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons

Abstract

In three experiments, pigeons were trained to discriminate between uniform arrays of two elements that differed in color, form, or size. They were then tested with arrays that contained different proportions of the two elements on these dimensions. In all cases, orderly discrimination gradients reflected these proportions. The discrimination readily transferred to new arrays with similar stimuli, but with different total numbers of elements. In Experiment 4, the pigeons were taught to discriminate between two groups of categorical stimuli: pictures of birds and pictures of flowers. A test with different proportions of each again produced a gradient based on relative numerosity. Experiment 5 demonstrated transfer of stimulus control on the numerosity dimension when pigeons were trained with one set of instances from two categories, and then were tested with new instances from the same categories.

References

  1. Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). The numerical attribute of stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 445–464). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, H., &Memmott, J. (1982). Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation.Psychological Bulletin,92, 547–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, C. A., &Honig, W. K. (1987). Memorization and “feature selection” in the acquisition of natural concepts in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,18, 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greene, S. L. (1983). Feature memorization in pigeon concept formation. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Hermstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 209–229). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttman, N., &Kalish, H. I. (1956). Discriminability and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 79–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrnstein, R. J. (1979). Acquisition, generalization, and reversal of a natural concept.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 116–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrnstein, R. J., &DeVilliers, P. A. (1980). Fish as a natural category for people and pigeons. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 59–95). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon.Science,146, 549–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., &Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Honig, W. K., Boneau, C. A., Burstein, K. R., &Pennypacker, H. S. (1961). Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,56, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenkins, H. M., &Harrison, R. H. (1960). Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 246–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lubow, R. E. (1974). Higher-order concept formation in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 475–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel, R. H., &Honig, W. K. (1970). Pigeon concept formation: Success and simultaneous acquisition.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 385–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaughan, W., Jr., &Herrnstein, R. J. (1987). Choosing among natural stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,47, 5–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. K. Honig.

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant AO-102 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Honig, W.K., Stewart, K.E. Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 17, 134–146 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207628

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stimulus Control
  • Discrimination Training
  • Transfer Test
  • Discrimination Ratio
  • Uniform Array