Abstract
In three experiments, pigeons were trained to discriminate between uniform arrays of two elements that differed in color, form, or size. They were then tested with arrays that contained different proportions of the two elements on these dimensions. In all cases, orderly discrimination gradients reflected these proportions. The discrimination readily transferred to new arrays with similar stimuli, but with different total numbers of elements. In Experiment 4, the pigeons were taught to discriminate between two groups of categorical stimuli: pictures of birds and pictures of flowers. A test with different proportions of each again produced a gradient based on relative numerosity. Experiment 5 demonstrated transfer of stimulus control on the numerosity dimension when pigeons were trained with one set of instances from two categories, and then were tested with new instances from the same categories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). The numerical attribute of stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 445–464). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davis, H., &Memmott, J. (1982). Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation.Psychological Bulletin,92, 547–571.
Edwards, C. A., &Honig, W. K. (1987). Memorization and “feature selection” in the acquisition of natural concepts in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,18, 235–260.
Greene, S. L. (1983). Feature memorization in pigeon concept formation. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Hermstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 209–229). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Guttman, N., &Kalish, H. I. (1956). Discriminability and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 79–88.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1979). Acquisition, generalization, and reversal of a natural concept.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 116–129.
Herrnstein, R. J., &DeVilliers, P. A. (1980). Fish as a natural category for people and pigeons. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 59–95). New York: Academic Press.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon.Science,146, 549–551.
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., &Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 285–311.
Honig, W. K., Boneau, C. A., Burstein, K. R., &Pennypacker, H. S. (1961). Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,56, 111–116.
Jenkins, H. M., &Harrison, R. H. (1960). Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 246–253.
Lubow, R. E. (1974). Higher-order concept formation in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 475–483.
Siegel, R. H., &Honig, W. K. (1970). Pigeon concept formation: Success and simultaneous acquisition.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 385–390.
Vaughan, W., Jr., &Herrnstein, R. J. (1987). Choosing among natural stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,47, 5–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant AO-102 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honig, W.K., Stewart, K.E. Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 17, 134–146 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207628
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207628