Abstract
In order to distinguish between the effects of low-level sensory mechanisms and those of higher level factors on eye-movement control processes, a simple letter search task was used in which cognitive load was reduced to the very minimum. The special purpose of this study was to test the visual span control hypothesis, which considers that, in such a task, eye movements are controlled as a direct function of spatial visibility limits (O’Regan, Lévy-Schoen, & Jacobs, 1983). In a first psychophysical experiment, three methods were used to manipulate the spatial visibility limits (visual span), as measured by a psychophysical procedure: changing viewing distance, interletter spacing, and target-background similarity. The results of this experiment then were used as a reference for predicting mean saccade sizes and fixation durations in a visual search task in which the same visibility changes were made. About 80% of the variance of mean saccade sizes could be accounted for by adjustment of saccades to changes in visual span, so the visual span control hypothesis was confirmed. As to the temporal characteristics of scanning behavior, less than 50% of fixation duration variance seemed to be determined by visual span changes. Other, higher level factors, possibly related to decisional processes intervening in the triggering of saccades and the computation of their spatial parameters, might play an important role in determining fixation durations in a simple search task. The results are interpreted in relation to recent models of eye-movement control by two largely independent subsystems functioning in parallel.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becker, W., &Jurgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli.Vision Research,19, 967–983.
Bouma, H. 1978). Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance, VII (pp. 115–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1975). Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels [Letter to the editor].Vision Research,15, 1411–1412.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1983). Sensory masking, persistence, and enhancement in visual exploration and reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 3–30). New York, Academic Press.
Coeffe, C. (1985).Two ways of improving accuracy of the saccade. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Eye Movements, Paris-Dourdan.
Deubel, H. (1984).Wechselwirkung von Sensorik und Motorik bei sakkadischen Augenbewegungen. Eine kybernetische Beschreibung des visuellen Systems. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Munich.
Engel, F. L. (1977). Visual conspicuity: Visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye.Vision Research,17, 95–108.
Findlav, J. M. (1983) Visual information processing for saccadic eye movements. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.),Spatially oriented behavior. New York: Springer.
Finney, D. J. (1947).Probit analysis. Cambridge: University Press.
Humbert, R. (1985). Comparaison par simulation de méthodes adaptatives de mesure de seuil.Bulletin de la Soctété Francaise d’Optique Physiologique,4, 2.
Jacobs, A. M. (1985a). Facteurs sensoriels et cognitifs dans l’exploration visuelle. In J. P. Caverm, C. Bonnet, & J. P. Codol (Eds.), Hommageà Georges Noizet: Jugement et langage. Bulletin de Psychologie, No spéoal.
Jacobs, A. in (1985b)Toward a model of oculomotor control in visual search. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Eye Movements, Paris-Dourdan.
Javal, E. (1879). Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture.Annales d’Oculistique,82, 243–253.
Kapoula, Z. (1984). Aiming precision and characteristics of saccades. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Keren, G. &Baggen, S. (1981). Recognition models of alphanumeric characters.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 234–246.
Kowler, E. (1985).Programming sequences of saccades. Paper presented at the 3rd ECEM, Pans-Dourdan.
Lévy-Schoen, A., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Coeffe, C. (1984) The relation between visibility span and eye movements in various scanning tasks. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 133–142). Amsterdam, North Holland.
Mackworth, N. H. (1976). Stimulus density limits the useful field of view. In R. A. Monty & J. W. Senders (Eds.),Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McConkie, G. W. (1983) Eye movements and perception during reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading. Perceptual and language processes (pp. 65–93). New York: Academic Press.
McConkie, G. W. &Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 578–586.
Moffitt, K. (1980). Evaluation of the fixation duration in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 360–372.
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulations of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 667–682.
Morrison, R. E., &Rayner, K. (1981). Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 395–396.
O’Regan, J. K. (1975). Structural and contextual constraints on eye movements in reading. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.
O’Regan, J. K. (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 501–509.
O’Regan, J. K. (1983) Elementary perceptual and eye movement control processes in reading. In. K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 121–138). New York: Academic Press.
O’Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., &Jacobs, A. M. (1983). The effect of visibility on eye movement parameters In reading.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 457–464.
Paterson, D. G., &Tinker, M. A. (1947). The effect of typography upon perceptual span in reading.American Journal of Psychology,3, 388–396.
Prinz, W., &Kehrer, L. (1982). Recording detection distances in continuous visual search. In R. Groner & P. Fraisse (Eds.),Cognition and eye movements (pp 10–23). Berlin, Verlag der Deutschen Wissenschaften.
Rayner, K. (1983). The perceptual span and eye movement control during reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp 97–118). New York: Academic Press.
Rayner, K., & Fisher, D. F. (1985). Eye movements and the perceptual span during visual search. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Eye Movements, Paris-Dourdan
Rayner, K., &McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader’s eye movements.Vision Research,16, 829–837.
Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., &Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements Implications for reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,9, 912–922.
Taylor, M. M., &Creeman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability function.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,41, 782–787.
Vassilev, A., &,Mitov, D. (1976) Perception time and spatial frequency.Vision Research,16, 89–92.
Vaughan, J., &Graefe, T. M. (1977). Delay of the stimulus presentation after the saccade in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 201–205.
Watt, R. J., &Andrews, D. P. (1981). APE: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric function.Current Psychological Reviews,1, 205–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the “Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobs, A.M. Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control?. Perception & Psychophysics 39, 47–58 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207583
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207583