Skip to main content

Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors

Abstract

This study investigated short-term memory for odors using a four-alternative, forced-choiced recognition paradigm. Stimuli were the odors of 36 common food substances. Twelve subjects were tested in each of four conditions, which differed in the activity performed during the retention interval. Recognition performance was poorest when subjects free associated to an additional odorant presented during the retention interval. Thus, interference from interpolated events does occur in odor memory. Recognition performance was best when the subjects free associated to the name of the target odorant during the retention interval. Thus, the memory code for odors may incorporate semantic information. Remembering odors appears, therefore, to be governed by the same principles as remembering stimuli in other modalities.

References

  • Bartlett, J. C. (1977). Remembering environmental sounds: The role of verbalization at input.Memory & Cognition,5, 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.),Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51–88). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., &Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 751–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., Karlin, M. B., &Dueck, A. (1975). Comprehension and memory for pictures.Memory & Cognition,3, 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. W., &Lenneberg, E. H. (1954). A study in language and cognition.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,49, 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S. (1979). To know with the nose: Keys to odor identification.Science,203, 467–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S., &Engen, T. (1969). Olfactory adaptation and the scaling of odor intensity. In C. Pfaffmann (Ed.),Olfaction and taste III (pp. 127–141). New York: Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cermak, G. W. (1971). Short-term recognition memory for complex free-form figures.Psychonomic Science,25, 209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. J. (1965). Recognition memory for random shapes as a function of complexity, association value, and delay.Journal of Experimental Psychology,69, 590–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corman, C. D., &Wickens, D. D. (1968). Retroactive inhibition in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour,7, 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. C., &Ellis, H. C. (1972). Stimulus codability and longterm recognition memory for visual form.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 83–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. G. (1975). Acquisition of verbal associations to olfactory stimuli of varying familiarity and to abstract visual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,104, 134–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. G. (1977), Acquisition and retention of verbal associations to olfactory and abstract visual stimuli of varying similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,3, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. G. (1981). The role of nonolfactory context cues in odor identification.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desor, J. A., &Beauchamp, G. K. (1974). The human capacity to transmit olfactory information.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 551–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1970). Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in immediate memory.Science,168, 1604–1605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, D. J., &Mullet, R. L. (1973). Locus of thematic effects in retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 404–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eich, J. E. (1978). Fragrances as cues for remembering words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,17, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T. (1977). Odor memory.Perfumer and Flavorist,2(August/ September), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T., Kuisma, J. E., &Eimas, P. D. (1973). Short-term memory of odors.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 222–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T., &Ross, B. M. (1973) Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 221–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J., &Haber, R. N. (1974). One reason why we rarely forget a face.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,3, 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. N., Roberts, K., &Holman, E. W. (1978). Similarity judgments and recognition memory for some common spices.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T. (1978). Recognition of common odors, pictures, and simple shapes.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 493–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T., &Cain, W. S. (1975). Recognition memory for odors.Chemical Senses and Flavor,1, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E., Grosmann, C., &Pieper, C. M. (1984). Learning unfamiliar voices.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,10, 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, J. A., &McDonald, W. T. (1931). Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition.American Journal of Psychology,43, 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1968). A note on long-term recognition memory for pictorial material.Psychonomic Science,11, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, G. T., Steinmetz, G., &Stone, H. (1970). Changes in absolute detection threshold and in subjective intensity of suprathreshold stimuli during olfactory adaptation and recovery.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. D., &Cain, W. S. (1984). Odor recognition: Familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,10, 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1974). Using selective interference to investigate spatial memory representations.Memory & Cognition,2, 749–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1975). Simultaneous processing of verbal and spatial information.Memory & Cognition,3, 221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., &Ackroyd, C. (1975). The effect of orienting tasks on recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,3, 140–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,4, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a thesis submitted by the senior author to the Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, in partial fulfillment of the requirments for the B. A. (Honours) degree. This research was supported by grants from the Queen’s University Advisory Research Committee and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (A0440) to the junior author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walk, H.A., Johns, E.E. Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors. Perception & Psychophysics 36, 508–514 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207510

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207510

Keywords

  • Recognition Memory
  • Retention Interval
  • Recognition Test
  • Semantic Information
  • Memory Item