Abstract
Human contrast sensitivity is known to vary with both stimulus spatial frequency and orientation. Previous research has indicated, however, that the apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating is independent of spatial frequency at suprathreshold levels. We have found that the apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings is not independent of its orientation. Observers adjusted the apparent contrasts of vertical and oblique gratings to match a 40% standard. Contrast match deviations were found at a number of spatial frequencies, indicating a lack of contrast constancy with stimulus orientation. The apparent contrast of gratings in different orientations could not be predicted in any simple fashion from either contrast threshold differences or ratios.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Appelle, S. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin, 1972,78, 266–278.
Blakemore, C, Muncey, J. P. J., &Ridley, R. M. Stimulus specificity in the human visual system.Vision Research, 1973,13, 1915–1931.
Bowker, D. O. Spatial frequency discrimination thresholds in different orientations.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1980,70, 462–463.
Campbell, F. W., &Green, D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.Journal of Physiology, 1965,181, 576–593.
Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., &Levinson, J. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.Journal of Physiology, 1966,187, 427–436.
Freeman, R. D., &Thibos, L. N. Contrast sensitivity in humans with abnormal visual experience.Journal of Physiology, 1975,247,687–710.
Georgeson, M. A., &Sullivan, G. D. Contrast constancy: Deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels.Journal of Physiology, 1975,252, 627–656.
Hamerly, J. R.T Quick, R. F., Jr., &Reichert, T. A. A study of grating contrast judgment.Vision Research, 1977,17, 201–207.
Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., &Westheimer, G. Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity for interference fringes on the retina.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967,57, 246–259.
Schade, O. H. Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1956,46, 721–739.
Watanabe, A., Mori, T., Nagata, S., &Hiwatashi, K. Spatial sine-wave responses of the human visual system.Vision Research, 1968,8, 1245–1263.
Wetherill, G. B., &Levitt, H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1965,18, 1–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research funded in part by National Eye Institute Grants EY-01319 (awarded to the Center for Visual Science) and EY-01875 (awarded to T. Pasternak).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowker, D.O., Mandler, M.B. Apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings varies with stimulus orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 29, 585–588 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207375
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207375