Abstract
Two theories of subjective contours are distinguished according to the interrelationship of subjective contours and subjective brightness effects. In one view, subjective contours are illusory brightness gradients generated from grouped local brightness effects. In another view, subjective contours are the edges of subjective forms created on the basis of gestalt factors; subjective brightness is a secondary consequence of form perception. Two experiments which use rating scales to separate judgments of subjective contour and subjective brightness are presented. The first shows that subjects may judge contour to be strong when there is no subjective brightness gradient. In the second, gestalt grouping factors are shown to be more important than factors which should influence brightness according to local effects theories. Both experiments support the view that subjective brightness occurs through interactions at the level of form perception.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bezold, W. Von.The theory of colour. Boston: Prang, 1876.
Bradley, D. R., &Durmais, S. T. Ambiguous cognitive contours.Nature, 1975,257, 582–584.
Day, R. H., &Jory, M. K. Subjective contours, visual acuity, and line contrast. In J. C. Armington, J. Krauskopf, & B. R. Wooten (Eds.),Visual psychophysics and physiology. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Evans, R. M.An introduction to colour. New York: Wiley, 1948.
Frisby, J. P., &Clatworthy, J. L. Illusory contours: Curious cases of simultaneous brightness contrast?Perception, 1975,4, 349–357.
Ginsburg, A. P. Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary?Nature, 1975,257, 219–220.
Gregory, R. L. Vision with isoluminant colour contrast: 1. A projection technique and observations.Perception, 1977.6, 113–119.
Helson, H. Studies of anomalous contrast and assimilation.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1963,53, 179–184.
Helson, H., &Rowles, F. H. A quantitative study of the reversal of classical lightness contrast.American Journal of Psychology, 1959,72, 530–538.
Jory, M. K., &Day, R. H. The relationship between brightness contrast and illusory contours.Perception, 1979,8, 3–9.
Kanizsa, G. Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea.Rivista di Psicologia, 1955,49, 7–30.
Kanizsa, G. Some new demonstrations of the role of structural factors in brightness contrast. In v. S. Ertel, L. Kemmler, & M. Stadler (Eds.),Gestalt Theorie in der modernen Psychologie, 1975.
Kanizsa, G. Subjective contours.Scientific American, 1976,234(4), 48–64.
Kennedy, J. M. Depth at an edge, coplanarity, slant depth, change in direction and change in brightness in the production of subjective contours.Italian Journal of Psychology, 1975,2, 107–123.
Kennedy, J. M. Illusory contours and the ends of lines.Perception, 1978,7, 605–607.
Kennedy, J. M. Subjective contours, contrast and assimilation. In C. F. Nodine & D. F. Fisher (Eds.),Perception and pictorial representation. New York: Praeger, 1979.
Kennedy, J. M., &Lee, H. A figure-density hypothesis and illusory contour brightness.Perception, 1976,5, 387–392.
Parks, T. E. The subjective brightness of illusory figures: Is stratification a factor?Perception, 1980,9, 361–363.
Varin, D. Fenomeni di contrasto e diffusione chromatica nell’ organizzazione spaziale del campi percettivo.Rivista di Psicologia, 1971,65, 101–128.
Ware, C. Coloured illusory triangles due to assimilation.Perception, 1980,9, 103–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ware, C. Subjective contours independent of subjective brightness. Perception & Psychophysics 29, 500–504 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207364
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207364