Abstract
Trading relations show that diverse acoustic consequences of minimal contrasts in speech are equivalent in perception of phonetic categories. This perceptual equivalence received stronger support from a recent finding that discrimination was differentially affected by the phonetic cooperation or conflict between two cues for the /slIt/-/splIt/contrast. Experiment 1 extended the trading relations and perceptual equivalence findings to the /sei/-/stei/contrast. With a more sensitive discrimination test, Experiment 2 found that cue equivalence is a characteristic of perceptual sensitivity to phonetic information. Using “sine-wave analogues” of the /sei/-/stei/stimuli, Experiment 3 showed that perceptual integration of the cues was phonetic, not psychoacoustic, in origin. Only subjects who perceived the sine-wave stimuli as “say” and “stay” showed a trading relation and perceptual equivalence; subjects who perceived them as nonspeech failed to integrate the two dimensions perceptually. Moreover, the pattern of differences between obtained and predicted discrimination was quite similar across the first two experiments and the “say”-“stay” group of Experiment 3, and suggested that phonetic perception was responsible even for better-than-predicted performance by these groups. Trading relations between speech cues, and the perceptual equivalence that underlies them, thus appear to derive specifically from perception of phonetic information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Lisker, L.Rapid vs. rabid: A catelogue of acoustic features that may cue the distinction (Status Report on Speech Research, SR-54, 127–132). New Haven, Conn: Haskins Laboratories, 1978.
Pisoni, D. B.On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds (Status Report on Speech Research, SR-27, 209–210). New Haven, Conn: Haskins Laboratories, 1971.
Bailey, P. J., Summerfield, A. Q., & Dorman, M. F.On the identification of sinewave analogues of certain nonspeech sounds (Status Report on Speech Research, SR-51/52, 1–25). New Haven, Corm: Haskins Laboratories, 1977.
Repp, B. H.Two strategies in fricative discrimination. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.
Robson, R., Morrongiello, B., Best, C. T., & Clifton, R. K.Trading relations in the perception of speech by five-year-olds and adults. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Hartford, Connecticut, April 1980.
Morse, P. A., Eilers, R., & Gavin, W.Exploring theperception of the “sound of silence” in early infancy. Paper presented at the second meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, April 1980.
Pastore, R. E. Personal communication, 1980.
Remez, R. E. Personal communication, 1979.
Repp, B. H. Personal communication, 1979.
Summerfield, A. Q. Personal communication, 1979.
References
Abramson, A. S., &Lisker, L. Voice onset time in stop consonants: Acoustic analysis and synthesis. In D. E. Commins (Ed.),Proceedings of the 5th Congress of International Acoustics. Liège, Belgium: Thone, 1965.
Bailey, P. J., &Summerfield, A. Q. Information in speech: Observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 536–563.
Carden, G., Levitt, A. G., Jusczyk, P. W., &Walley, A. Evidence for phonetic processing of cues to place of articulation: Perceived manner affects perceived place.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,29, 26–36.
Cerella, J. Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 68–77.
Creelman, C. D., &MacMillan, N. A. Auditory phase and frequency discrimination: A comparison of nine methods.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 146–156.
Crowder, R. G. The sound of vowels and consonants in immediate memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 587–596.
Crowder, R. G. Representation of speech sounds in precategorical acoustic storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,1, 14–24.
Crowher, R. G., &Morton, J. Pre-categorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,5, 365–373.
Cutwing, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Categories and boundaries in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 564–570.
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Discrimination functions predicted from categories in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 87–88.
Cutting, J. E., Rosner, B. S., &Foard, C. F. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,28, 361–378.
Darwin, C. J., &Baddeley, A. D. Acoustic memory and the perception of speech.Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 41–60.
Delattre, P. C., Liberman, A. M., &Cooper, F. S. Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955,27, 769–773.
Divenyi, P. L.Some psychoacoustic factors in phonetic analysis.Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Copenhagen: Stougaard Jensen, 1979.
Divenyi, P. L., &Danner, W. F. Discrimination of time intervals marked by brief acoustic pulses of various intensities and spectra.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 125–142.
Divenyi, P. L., &Sachs, R. M. Discrimination of time intervals bounded by tone bursts.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 429–436.
Dorman, M. F.On the identification of sineway analogues of CV syllables.Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: Stougaard Jensen, 1979.
Dorman, M. F., Raphael, L. J., &Isenberg, D. Acoustic cues for the fricative/affricate contrast in word-final position.Journal of Phonetics, 1980,8, 397–405.
Dorman, M. F., Raphael, L. J., &Liberman, A. M. Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979,65, 1518–1532.
Dorman, M. F., Studdert-Kennedy, M., &Raphael, L. J. Stop consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 109–122.
Fant, C. G. M. Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech.Logos, 1962,5, 3–17.
Fitch, H. L., Halwes, T. G., Erickson, D. M., &Liberman, A. M. Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop consonant manner.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 343–350.
Fujisaki, H., &Kawashima, T. On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception.Annual Report of the Audio Engineering Society, 1969,28, 67–73.
Garner, W. R., &Morton, J. Perceptual independence: Definitions, models, and experimental paradigms.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 233–259.
Green, D. M.An introduction to hearing. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Haggard, M. P., Ambler, S., &Callow, M. Pitch as a voicing cue.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970,47, 613–617.
Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., &Cooper, F. S. Effect of third-formant transitions on the perception of the voiced stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1958,30, 122–126.
Hoffman, H. S. Study of some cues in the perception of the voiced stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1958,30, 1035–1041.
Jusczyk, P. W. Infant speech perception: A critical appraisal. In P. D. Limbs & J. A. Miller (Eds.),Perspectives on the study of speech. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1981.
Kaplan, H. L., MacMillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. Methods and designs: Tables of d’ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1978,10, 796–813.
Kuhl, P. K. Predispositions for perception of speech-sound categories: A species-specific phenomenon? In F. D. Minifie & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Communicative and cognitive abilities— Early behavioral assessment. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1978.
Kuhl, P. K., &Miller, J. D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants.Science, 1975,190, 69–72.
Kuhl, P. K., &Miller, J. D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,63, 905–917.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 430–460.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., &Griffith, B. C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,61, 379–388.
Liberman, A. M., &Pisoni, D. B. Evidence for a special speechperceiving subsystem in the human. In T. H. Bullock (Ed.),Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Berlin: Dahlem Konferenzen, 1977.
Liberman, A. M., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Phonetic perception. In H. L. Teuber (Ed.),Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 8) Perception. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1978.
Lisker, L. Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975,57, 1547–1551.
Lisker, L., Liberman, A. M., Erickson, D. M., Dechovltz, D., &Mandler, R. On pushing the voice-onset-time (VOT) boundary about.Language and Speech, 1977,20, 209–216.
MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., &Strange, W. Native language effects on liquid perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980,67 (Suppl.), S27. (Abstract K12)
MacMillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., &Creelman, C. D. The psychophysics of categorical perception.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 452–471.
Mann, V. A. Influence of preceding liquids on stop-consonant perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980,67 (Suppl.), S99, (Abstract QQI)
Mann, V. A., &Repp, B. H. Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∝]-[s] distinction.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,28, 213–228.
Mann, V. A., &Repp, B. H. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981,69, 548–558.
McGovern, K., &Strange, W. The perception of /r/ and /l/ in syllable-initial and syllable-final position.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 162–170.
Miller, J. A., &Liberman, A. M. Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 457–465.
Miller, J. D., Wier, C. C., Pastore, R. E., Kelly, W. J., &Dooling, R. J. Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60, 410–417.
Morse, P. A., &Snowdon, C. T. An investigation of categorical speech discrimination by rhesus monkeys.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 9–16.
Pastore, R. E., Ahroon, W. A., Baffuto, K. J., Friedman, C., Puleo, J. S., &Fink, E. A. Common factor model of categorical perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,4, 686–696.
Pastore, R. E., Friedman, C. J., &Baffuto, K. J. A comparative evaluation of the AX and two ABX procedures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60 (Suppl.), S120. (Abstract)
Pisoni, D. B. Auditory short term memory and vowel perception.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 7–18.
Pisoni, D. B. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two-component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 1352–1361.
Pisoni, D. B., &Lazarus, J. H. Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,55, 328–333.
Pisoni, D. B., &Tash, J. Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic boundaries.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 285–290.
Repp, B. H. Relative amplitude of aspiration noise as a voicing cue for syllable-initial stop consonants.Language and Speech, 1979,22, 173–189.
Repp, B. H., Healy, A. F., &Crowder, R. G. Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979,5, 129–145.
Repp, B. H., Linerman, A. M., Eccaadt, T., &Pesetsicy, D. Perceptual integration of temporal cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 621–637.
Repp, B. H., &Mann, V. A. Perceptual assessment of fricative-stop coarticulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980,67 (Suppl.), S100. (Abstract QQ8)
Schelleng, J. C. The bowed string and the player.Journal of the Acoustical Society of A merica, 1973,53, 26–41.
Simon, C., &Fourcin, A. J. Cross-language study of speech-pattern learning.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,63, 925–935.
Stevens, K. N. The role of rapid spectrum changes in the production and perception of speech. In L. L. Hammerich & R. Jakobson (Eds.),Form and substance: Festschrift for Eli Fischer-Jørgensen. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 1971.
Stevens, K. N. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In L. Pinson & D. Denes (Eds.),Human communication: A unified view. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1974.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. Speech perception. In N. J. Lass (Ed.),Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
Summerfield, D. A. Q.Perceptual learning and phonetic perception. Interrelations of the communicative senses.Proceedings of the NSF Conference at Asilomar. Washington, D.C: NSF Publication, 1978.
Summerfield, A. Q., &Haggard, M. P. On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,62, 435–448.
Waters, R. S., &Wilson, W. A. Speech perception by rhesus monkeys: The voicing distinction in synthesized labial and velar stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 285–289.
Weyer, R. D. Time-frequency-structures in the attack transients of piano and harpsichord sounds—1.Acustica, 1976,35, 233–252.
Weyer, R. D. Time-varying amplitude-frequency-structures in the attack transients of piano and harpsichord sounds—11.Acustica, 1976–77,36, 241–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by NICHD Grant HD01994 to the Haskins Laboratories and NINCDS Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant NS5085 to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Best, C.T., Morrongiello, B. & Robson, R. Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 29, 191–211 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207286
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207286