Skip to main content
Download PDF

Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness

Perception & Psychophysics volume 48, pages 169–178 (1990)Cite this article

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined whether or not pairs of auditory dimensions—timbre-loudness (Experiment 1) and timbre-pitch (Experiment 2)—interact in speeded classification. Subjects classified values from one dimension while the other dimension was (1) held constant (baseline), (2) varied orthogonally (filtering), or (3) correlated linearly. The subjects showed substantial Garner interference when classifying all dimensions—that is, poor performance at filtering relative to baseline. Timbre and loudness displayed redundancy gain (i.e., performance faster than baseline) when correlated positively, but redundancy loss (i.e., interference) when correlated negatively. Timbre and pitch displayed redundancy gain however dimensions were correlated. Both pairs of dimensions showed substantial effects of congruity: Attributes from one dimension were classified faster when paired with “congruent” attributes from the other dimension. The results are interpreted in terms of an interactive multichannel model of auditory processing.

References

  • Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., &Brownell, H. H. (1975). Judging up and down.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,1, 339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., &Brownell, H. H. (1976). Position, direction, and their perceptual mtegrality.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 328–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeValois, R. L., &DeValois, K. K. (1987).Spatial vision. New York. Oxford Umversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlach, N. I., Braida, L. D., &Ito, Y. (1986). Toward a model for discrinunation of broadband signals.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,80, 63–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R. (1981) The analysts of unanalyzed perceptions. In M Kubovy & J R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 119–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970) Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cogninve Psychology,1, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. (1981). Psychophysics of spatial frequency channels. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J. W., &Kemler-Nelson, D. G. (1988). The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,117, 347–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M. (1988).Profile analysts. Auditory intensity discrimination New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., Hylton, R., &Graham, N. (1982). Simultaneous recognition of two spatial-frequency components.Vision Research,22, 365–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, P., &Krumhansi, C. (1989). Pitch and timbre interaction in isolated tones and in sequencesJournal of the Acoustical Soctety, of America,86 (Suppl 1), S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePage, E. L. (1987a) Frequency-dependent self-induced bias of the basilar membrane and its potential for controlling sensitivity and turing in the mamanalian cochlea.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,82, 139–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepage, E. L. (1987b) A spatial template for the shape of tuning curves in the mammalian cochlea.Journal of the Acoustical Soctety of America,82, 155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhead, G. R. (1966) Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 95–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhead, G. R. (1972). Processing dimensional stimuli: A notePsychological Review,79, 410–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhead, G. R. (1979) Holistic versus analyttc process models: A reply.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,5, 746–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L. E. (1987) On cross-modal similanty: Auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L. E., Hamseal, R. J., & Bornstein, M. H. (1987). Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,52(1, Serial No. 215).

  • Melara, R. D. (1989a) Dimensional interaction between color and pitchJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Percepnon & Performance,15, 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melara, R. D (1989b). Similarity relations among synesthetic stimuli and their attributesJournal of Erperimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,15, 212–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990a) Dimenstonal interactions in language processmg Investigating directlons and levels of crosstalk.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition

  • Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990b).Hard andSoft interacting dimensions: Differential effects of dual context on classification.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990c). Perceptual primacy of dimensions Support for a model of dimensional interaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance.

  • Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (in press). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.Memory & Cognition.

  • Melara.,R. D., &O’Brien T. P. (1987). Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,112, 515–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, J. R. (1986). Visual form perception: An overview In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.),Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Visual perception (pp 1–30). New York Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, J. R., Pristach, E. A., &Carson, C. E. (1989). Attennon and object perception. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception Structure and process (pp. 53–89). Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poner, M. I (1964) Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks.Psychological Review,71, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. M. (1979). Software timing for 6500 series microcomputers.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,11, 568–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P., &Smith, S. (1984). Stroop interference based on the synesthetic qualities of auditory pitch.Perception,13, 75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P., &Smith, S. (1986). The basis of Stroop interference involving the multimodal correlates of auditory pitch.Perception,15, 491–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. C. (1975). Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: Neurophysiological and Information-processing analyses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E. (1986). A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessmg model with active feedback.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,80, 146–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Robert D. Melara

    Present address: Department of Psychological Sciences at Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, IN

Affiliations

  1. John B. Pierce Foundatton Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut

    Robert D. Melara & Lawrence E. Marks

  2. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

    Robert D. Melara & Lawrence E. Marks

Authors
  1. Robert D. Melara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence E. Marks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Preparauon of this arlacle was supported by Nataonal Inslatutes of Health (NIH) Postdoctoral Fellowship HD07137 and NIH Grant NS28617 to Robert Melara and by NIH Grant DC00271 and National Science Foundation Grant BNS84-20017 to Lawrence Marks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melara, R.D., Marks, L.E. Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 169–178 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207084

Keywords

  • Duty Cycle
  • Journal ofExperimental Psychology
  • Congruity Effect
  • Irrelevant Dimension
  • Redundancy Gain