Abstract
In two experiments, subjects adjusted various pairings of the top and bottom boundaries of two obliquely oriented outline bars (Experiment 1) and those of two similarly oriented complete and incomplete squares (Experiment 2) to apparent alignment. The data from the first experiment showed that the misalignment effects were determined jointly by the directional properties of the bar ends (vertical, oblique, and semicircular) and the pair of boundaries that were aligned (both top boundaries, top of upper bar with bottom of lower bar, bottom of upper bar with top of lower bar). The results from the second experiment showed that the misalignment effects were the same for the oblique boundaries of solid and outline squares and persisted when the squares were reduced to two parallel lines. The effect was undiminished when the ends of the parallels were aligned, but was markedly reduced when pairs of parallels themselves were aligned. The outcomes of the two experiments are explained in terms of the apparentpositions of the oblique boundaries. It is proposed that these vary with the positions of the elements (bar or square) relative to the visual field, the position of the boundaries relative to the stimulus elements, and the positions of the boundaries relative to axes that are delineated by the parallel adjacent ends of bars and sides of squares. This relative-position basis for apparent misalignment is held to be the basis of misalignment effects in other figures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Day, R. H. (1973a). The oblique line illusion: The Poggendorff effect without parallels.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 535–541.
Day, R. H. (1973b). The Poggendorff illusion with obtuse and acute angles.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 590–596.
Day, R. H., Bellamy, S., &Norman, A. (1983). On the Morinaga misalignment illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 113–125.
Day, R. H., &Dickinson, R. G. (1976). The components of the Poggendorff illusion.British Journal of Psychology,67, 537–552.
Day, R. H., Jee, F. M., &Duffy, F. M. (1989). Visual misalignment in arc and chevron figures.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 762–770.
Day, R. H., &Stecher, E. J. (1992). Some variant forms of the Poggendorff illusion and their implications for an explanation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,30, 26–28.
Day, R. H., Stecher, E. J., &Parker, A. L. (1993). The effect of edge orientation and movement direction on the apparent misalignment of collinear bars.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 642–647.
Green, R. T., &Hoyle, E. M. (1964). The influence of spatial orientation on the Poggendorff illusion.Acta Psychologica,22, 348–365.
Hotopf, W. H. N., &Hibberd, M. C. (1989). The role of angles in inducing misalignment in the Poggendorff figure.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 355–383.
Morinaga, S., &Ikeda, H. (1965). Paradox in displacement in geometric illusion and the problem of dimensions: A contribution to the study of space perception.Japanese Journal of Psychology,36, 231–238.
Pressey, A. W., &den Heyer, K. (1968). Observations on Chiang’s “new” theory of geometrical illusions.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 313–314.
Restle, F. (1969). Illusions of bent line.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 273–274.
Restle, F. (1976). Morinaga’s paradox and figure-ground organization.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 153–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant to the first author by the Australian Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Day, R.H., Halford, A.P. On apparent misalignment of collinear edges and boundaries. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 517–524 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206948
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206948