Space aliens and nonwords: Stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs

Abstract

We describe a set of pictorial and auditory stimuli that we have developed for use in word learning tasks in which the participant learns pairings of novel auditory sound patterns (names) with pictorial depictions of novel objects (referents). The pictorial referents are drawings of “space aliens,” consisting of images that are variants of 144 different aliens. The auditory names are possible nonwords of English; the stimulus set consists of over 2,500 nonword stimuli recorded in a single voice, with controlled onsets, varying from one to seven syllables in length. The pictorial and nonword stimuli can also serve as independent stimulus sets for purposes other than word learning. The full set of these stimuli may be downloaded fromwww.psychonomic.org/archive/.

References

  1. Gupta, P. (2003). Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 1213–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, P., & Lipinski, J. (2004).Immediate serial recall and word learning: Is the relationship at phonology or semantics? Manuscript submitted for publication.

  3. Gupta, P., Lipinski, J., Abbs, B., & Lin, P.-H. (in press). Serial position effects in nonword repetition.Journal of Memory & Language.

  4. Gupta, P., MacWhinney, B., Feldman, H., &Sacco, K. (2003). Phonological memory and vocabulary learning in children with focal lesions.Brain & Language,87,241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, P., Tomblin, B., Abbs, B., & Lipinski, J. (2004).Phonological priming and learning in SLI. Manuscript in preparation.

  6. Lipinski, J., &Gupta, P. (2003). Separating the effects of duration and neighborhood density in nonword repetition latency. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.),Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 718). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lipinski, J., & Gupta, P. (in press). Does neighborhood density influence repetition latency for nonwords? Separating the effects of density and duration.Journal of Memory & Language.

  8. Luce, P. A., &Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model.Ear & Hearing,19,1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, N., Gupta, P., Lipinski, J., Abbs, B., Schwartz, M., & Dell, G. (2004).Differentiating receptive and productive word learning in fluent aphasic patients. Manuscript in preparation.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prahlad Gupta.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by a University of Iowa CIFRE grant to P.G.; by NIH Grant R01 DC01924 to N.M., P.G., and others; and by NIH Grant R01 DC006499 to P.G. The alien pictures were drawn by Chuck Dillon, and the nonword stimuli were recorded by Rebecca Reese.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, P., Lipinski, J., Abbs, B. et al. Space aliens and nonwords: Stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36, 599–603 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206540

Download citation

Keywords

  • Serial Recall
  • Head Shape
  • Neighborhood Density
  • Word Learning
  • Nonword Repetition