Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Reports
  • Published: December 2005

An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults

  • Jeffrey S. Anastasi1 &
  • Matthew G. Rhodes2 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 12, pages 1043–1047 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

In the present study, we examined whether children and older adults exhibit an own-age face recognition bias. Participants studied photographs of children, younger adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults and were administered a recognition test. Results showed that both children and older adults more accurately recognized own-age faces than other-age faces. These data suggest that individuals may acquire expertise for identifying faces from their own age group and are discussed in terms of Sporer’s (2001) in-group/out-group model of face recognition.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Adams-Price, C. (1992). Eyewitness memory and aging: Predictors of accuracy in recall and person recognition.Psychology & Aging,7, 602–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, J. S., &Rhodes, M. G. (2006). Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition.North American Journal of Psychology,8, 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L. (1991). Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge.Memory & Cognition,19, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J. C., &Leslie, J. E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces.Memory & Cognition,14, 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, J. C., &Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons.Journal of Social Issues,41, 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, J. E., &Goldstein, A. G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children’s eyewitness testimony.Journal of Social Issues,40, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M. S. (1997). Face recognition: Effects of age of subjects and age of stimulus faces.Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology,10, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, A., &Bartlett, J. C. (1991). Young and old faces in young and old heads: The factor of age in face recognition.Psychology & Aging,6, 623–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furl, N., Phillips, P. J., &O’Toole, A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis.Cognitive Science,26, 797–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, T. (2005). Own-age biases in verbal person memory.Memory,13, 21–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • List, J. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony.Developmental Psychology,22, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. E. (1986). Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification.Experimental Aging Research,12, 151–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, C. A., &Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review.Psychology, Public Policy, & Law,7, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect, T. J., &Harris, L. J. (2003). Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending?Memory & Cognition,31, 570–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect, T. J., &Moon, H. (2005). The own-age effect in face recognition. In J. Duncan, L. Phillips, & P. McLeod (Eds.),Measuring the mind: Speed, control, and age (pp. 317–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, M. J. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard.Social Cognition,5, 144–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, J. [H.], Bartlett, J. C., &Memon, A. (2000). Influence of post-event narratives, line-up conditions and individual differences on false identification by young and older eyewitnesses.Legal & Criminological Psychology,5, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., Memon, A., &Swanson, K. (2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement.Journal of Applied Psychology,86, 207–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., &Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in Whites.Basic & Applied Social Psychology,22, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories.Psychology, Public Policy, & Law,7, 36–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. B., &Stroud, J. S. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age.Law & Human Behavior,26, 641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey, A. D. (1993). Adult age and gender differences in eyewitness recall in field settings.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,23, 1921–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University at the West Campus, 4701 W. Thunderbird Road, 85306, Glendale, AZ

    Jeffrey S. Anastasi

  2. Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

    Matthew G. Rhodes

Authors
  1. Jeffrey S. Anastasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew G. Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey S. Anastasi.

Additional information

This work was partially supported by a Scholarship, Research, and Creative Activities (SRCA) grant from Arizona State University at the West Campus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anastasi, J.S., Rhodes, M.G. An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 1043–1047 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206441

Download citation

  • Received: 25 January 2005

  • Accepted: 03 April 2005

  • Issue Date: December 2005

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206441

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Face Recognition
  • Mirror Effect
  • Superior Recognition
  • Recognition Difference
  • West Campus
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 44.201.92.114

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.