Abstract
Six experiments used magazine approach in rat subjects to explore changes with time in responding for stimuli brought to a common moderate level of performance through acquisition or extinction. They found no evidence for increases with time in behavior during stimuli given simple acquisition. However, stimuli brought to that same level by reversal learning, repeated reversal, or partial reinforcement all showed increases in responding with time. These results suggest that the decremental process established by nonreinforcement endures through subsequent reinforcement and is especially sensitive to the passage of time.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bouton, M. E., &Brooks, D. C. (1993). Time and context effects on performance in a Pavlovian discrimination reversal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 165–179.
Brooks, D. C., &Bouton, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 77–89.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 120–132.
Devenport, L. D. (1998). Spontaneous recovery without interference: Why remembering is adaptive.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 172–181.
Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression.Psychological Review,62, 145–154.
Kehoe, E. J., Morrow, L. D., &Holt, P. E. (1984). General transfer across sensory modalities survives reductions in the original conditioned reflex in the rabbit.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 129–136.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes (G. B. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Rescorla, R. A. (1997). Spontaneous recovery after Pavlovian conditioning with multiple outcomes.Animal Learning & Behavior,25, 99–107.
Rescorla, R. A. (2001). Retraining of extinguished Pavlovian stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,27, 115–124.
Rescorla, R. A. (2002). Comparison of the rates of associative change during acquisition and extinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,28, 406–415.
Rescorla, R. A. (2003). More rapid associative change with retraining than with initial training.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,29, 251–260.
Rescorla, R. A. (2004a). Spontaneous recovery.Learning & Memory,11, 501–509.
Rescorla, R. A. (2004b). Spontaneous recovery varies inversely with the training—extinction interval.Learning & Behavior,32, 401–408.
Robbins, S. J. (1990). Mechanisms underlying spontaneous recovery in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 235–249.
Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals.Psychological Review,43, 427–449.
Swartzentruber, D., &Rescorla, R. A. (1994). Modulation of trained and extinguished stimuli by facilitators and inhibitors.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 309–316.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 MH67848.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rescorla, R.A. Spontaneous recovery after reversal and partial reinforcement. Learning & Behavior 35, 191–200 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206425
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206425