Abstract
The revelation effect is evidenced by an increase in positive recognition responses when the test probe is immediately preceded by an unrelated problem-solving task. As an alternative to familiarity-based explanations of this effect (Hicks & Marsh, 1998; Westerman & Greene, 1998), Niewiadomski and Hockley (2001) proposed a decision-based account in which it is assumed that the problem-solving task displaces the study list context in working memory, leading subjects to adopt a more liberal recognition criterion. In the present study, we show that the revelation effect is seen when the stimulus materials are pure lists of very rare words or nonwords. In contrast, for mixed lists of common words and very rare words or nonwords, the revelation effect is found for common words but disappears for very rare words and nonwords. We argue that, in mixed lists, the liberal decision bias following the revelation task and the criterion changes between common words and very rare words and nonwords serve to offset each other.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cameron, T. E., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: Familiarity versus recollection.Memory & Cognition,28, 176–183.
Donaldson, W. (1993). Accuracy of d9 and A9 as estimates of sensitivity.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 271–274.
Dywan, J., &Jacoby, L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame.Psychology & Aging,5, 379–387.
Frigo, L. C., Reas, D. L., &LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Revelation with presentation: Counterfeit study list yields robust revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,27, 339–343.
Gibson, J. M., &Watkins, M. J. (1988). A pool of 1,086 words with unique two-letter fragments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 390–397.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Greene, R. L. (1999). The role of familiarity in recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 309–312.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1105–1120.
Hockley, W. E., & Niewiadomski, M. W. (2000). [The revelation effect when conditions are blocked at test]. Unpublished raw data.
LeCompte, D. C. (1995). Recollective experience in the revelation effect: Separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,23, 324–334.
Luo, C. R. (1993). Enhanced feeling of recognition: Effects of identifying and manipulating test items on recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 405–413.
McIntyre, J. S., &Craik, F. I. (1987). Age differences in memory for item and source information.Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 175–192.
MRC Psycholinguistic Database (On-line). (1997). Available at: http://www.psy.uwa.edu.au/MRCDataBase/uwa_mrc.htm.
Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur.Psychology & Aging,10, 492–497.
Niewiadomski, M. W., &Hockley, W. E. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of familiarity-based accounts of the revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 1130–1138.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76, 1–25.
PeynirciogÏ lu, Z. F., &Tekcan, A. (1993). Revelation effect: Effort or priming does not create the sense of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 382–388.
Prull, M. W., Light, L. L., Collett, M. E., &Kennison, R. F. (1998). Age-related differences in memory illusions: Revelation effect.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,5, 147–165.
Ratcliff, R., Hockley, W., &McKoon, G. (1985). Components of activation: Repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 435–450.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Watkins, M. J., &PeynirciogÏ lu, Z. F. (1990). The revelation effect: When disguising test items induces recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1012–1020.
Westerman, D. L. (2000). Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.Memory & Cognition,28, 167–175.
Westerman, D. L., &Greene, R. L. (1996). On the generality of the revelation effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1147–1153.
Westerman, D. L., &Greene, R. L. (1998). The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 377–386.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 681–690.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hockley, W.E., Niewiadomski, M.W. Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect. Memory & Cognition 29, 1176–1184 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206387
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206387