Abstract
Three recognition memory experiments examined phonemic similarity and false recognition under conditions of divided attention. The manipulation was presumed to have little effect on automatic, perceptual influences of memory. Prior research demonstrated that false recognition of a test word (e.g.,discrepancy) was higher if the study list included a nonword derived from the future test word by changing a phoneme near the end of the item (e.g.,discrepan/l/y) relative to an early phoneme change (e.g.,/l/iscrepancy). The difference has been attributed to automatic, implicit activation of test words during prerecognition processing of related nonwords. Three experiments demonstrated that the latechange condition also contributed to higher false recognition rates with divided attention at encoding. Dividing attention disrupted recognition memory of studied words in Experiments 1 and 3. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance for an interpretation emphasizing the automatic, implicit activation of candidate words that occurs in the course of identifying spoken words and nonwords.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anisfeld, M., &Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 171–179.
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., &Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 518–540.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Deese, J. A. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Dewhurst, S. A., &Hitch, G. J. (1997). Illusions of familiarity caused by cohort activation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 566–571.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1483–1498.
Isingrini, M., Vazou, F., &Leroy, P. (1995). Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall.Memory & Cognition,23, 462–467.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983a). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983b). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user’s guide for the process-dissociation procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 3–26.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148–172). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, J. L., &Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
McDermott, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 582–586.
Monsell, S., &Hirsh, K. W. (1998). Competitor priming in spoken word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1495–1520.
Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming.Memory & Cognition,25, 11–17.
Mulligan, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 27–47.
Mulligan, N. W., &Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests.Memory & Cognition,24, 453–465.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Gavrilescu, D., &Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.Memory & Cognition,28, 965–976.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., &Dori, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1091–1104.
Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition.Cognition,52, 189–234.
Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., &Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 507–514.
Parkin, A. J., &Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2, 71–80.
Postman, L., &Keppel, G. (Ed.) (1970).Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1999). Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: An analysis using a processdissociation approach.Memory & Cognition,27, 512–525.
Slowiaczek, L. M., Nusbaum, H. C., &Pisoni, D. B. (1987). Phonological priming in auditory word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 64–75.
Sommers, M. S., &Lewis, B. P. (1999). Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 83–108.
Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.
Underwood, B. J., &Zimmerman, J. (1973). The syllable as a source of error in multisyllable word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 701–706.
Wallace, W. P., &Collins, J. E. (1991). The influence on recognition of spoken words that are misperceived.Memory & Cognition,19, 498–506.
Wallace, W. P., Malone, C. P., &Spoo, A. D. (2000). Implicit word activation during prerecognition processing: False recognition and remember/ know judgments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 149–157.
Wallace, W. P., Stewart, M. T., &Malone, C. P. (1995). Recognition memory errors produced by implicit activation of word candidates during the processing of spoken words.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 417–439.
Wallace, W. P., Stewart, M. T., Shaffer, T. R., &Wilson, J. A. (1998). Are false recognitions influenced by prerecognition processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 299–315.
Wallace, W. P., Stewart, M. T., Sherman, H. L., &Mellor, M. D. (1995). False positives in recognition memory produced by cohort activation.Cognition,55, 85–113.
Wolters, G., &Prinsen, A. (1997). Full versus divided attention and implicit memory performance.Memory & Cognition,25, 764–771.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, W.P., Shaffer, T.R., Amberg, M.D. et al. Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition 29, 1102–1110 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206379
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206379