Abstract
Situation model updating requires managing the availability of information as a function of its relevance to the current situation. This is thought to involve some aspect of working memory. The present study assesses the relation between updating ability and various measures of working memory span or capacity. In addition, a primitive general measure of situation model processing, a situation model identification test, and its relation to updating ability was also assessed. The present experiment used a version of a paradigm developed by Glenberg, Meyer, and Lindem (1987) to assess updating. Although updating was observed in both anaphoric reading time and recognition test accuracy measures, the reading time measure was relatively weak. Importantly, the updating effect on the recognition test was unrelated to working memory capacity. In contrast, updating was related to performance on the situation model identification task. Specifically, people who were good at model processing were better able to keep associated objects available than were people who were less adept. There were no differences in the maintenance of dissociated objects. These results suggest that the relationship between situation model processing and working memory capacity is relatively weak.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory or working attention? In A.D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 152–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J., &Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach.Cognitive Psychology,3, 193–209.
Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., &Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 422–433.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
Ericsson, K. A., &Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory.Psychological Review,102, 211–245.
Friedman, N. P., &Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles for visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 61–83.
Garnham, A. (1981). Mental models as representations of text.Memory & Cognition,9, 560–565.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990).Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner K. R., &Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 430–445.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What is memory for?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–55.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Hamm, V. P., &Hasher, L. (1992). Age and the availability of inference.Psychology & Aging,7, 56–64.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 336–358.
Lutz, M. F., &Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 293–310.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.
Radvansky, G. A., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Narrative comprehension and aging: The fate of completed goal information.Psychology & Aging,13, 69–79.
Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphor resolution and the focus of attention in situation models.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 110–131.
Rinck, M., Hähnel, A., &Becker, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 67–80.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.
Shah, P., &Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 4–27.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., &Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 141–154.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model.Psychological Science,6, 292–297.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 199–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Army Research Institute, ARMY-DASW01-99-K-0001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radvansky, G.A., Copeland, D.E. Working memory and situation model updating. Memory & Cognition 29, 1073–1080 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206375
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206375