Abstract
The name chosen for an object is influenced by both short-term history (e.g., speaker-addressee pacts) and long-term history (e.g., the language’s naming pattern for the domain). But these influences must somehow be linked. We propose that names adopted through speaker-addressee collaboration have influences that carry beyond the original context. To test this hypothesis, we adapted the standard referential communication task. The first director of each matching session was a confederate who introduced one of two possible names for each object. The director role then rotated to naive participants. The participants later rated name preference for the introduced and alternative names for each object. They also rated object typicality or similarity to each named category. The name that was initially introduced influenced later name use and preference, even for participants who had not heard the name from the original director. Typicality and similarity showed lesser effects from the names originally introduced. Name associations built in one context appear to influence retrieval and use of names in other contexts, but they have reduced impact on nonlinguistic object knowledge. These results support the notion that stable conventions for object names within a linguistic community may arise from local interactions, and they demonstrate how different populations of speakers may come to have a shared understanding of objects’ nonlinguistic properties but different naming patterns.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashcraft, M. H. (1978). Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion.Memory & Cognition,6, 227–232.
Barr, D. J. (in press). The emergence of conventions in language communities. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),World-situated language use: Psycholinguistic, linguistic, and computational perspectives on bridging the product and action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barr, D. J., &Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring and comprehension in linguistic precedents.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 391–418.
Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts.Cognition,60, 1–29.
Brennan, S. E., &Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1482–1493.
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., &Walter, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 73–86.
Carroll, J. M. (1980). Naming and describing in social communication.Language & Speech,23, 309–322.
Clark, H. H. (1998). Communal lexicons. In K. Malmkjær & J. Williams (Eds.),Context in language learning and language understanding (pp. 63–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., &Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.),Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., &Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process.Cognition,22, 1–39.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garrod, S., &Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialog: A study in conceptual and semantic coordination.Cognition,27, 181–218.
Garrod, S., &Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, coordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions.Cognition,53, 181–215.
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., &Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition.Cognition,83, 49–79.
Hock, H. H., &Joseph, B. D. (1996). Language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1999). Attention to functional properties in toddlers’ naming and problem-solving.Cognitive Development,14, 77–100.
Krauss, R. M., &Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication: Competence as a function of age.Child Development,40, 255–266.
Krauss, R. M., &Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,4, 343–346.
Levelt, W. J. M., &Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,14, 78–106.
Lewis, D. (1969).Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., &Gennari, S. (2003a). Speaking vs. thinking about objects and actions. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.),Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 81–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., &Gennari, S. (2003b). Universality and language specificity in object naming.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 20–42.
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., &Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 230–262.
Malt, B. C., &Smith, E. E. (1982). The role of familiarity in determining typicality.Memory & Cognition,10, 69–75.
Malt, B. C., &Smith, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 250–269.
Markman, A. B., &Makin, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 331–354.
Metzing, C., &Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 201–213.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (in press). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Behavioral & Brain Sciences.
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Singleton, D. (2000).Language and the lexicon: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sloman, S. A., Harrison, M. C., &Malt, B. C. (2002). Recent exposure affects artifact naming.Memory & Cognition,30, 687–695.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NIMH Grant MH51271 to B.C.M. and S.A.S. and an American Philosophical Society sabbatical fellowship to B.C.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malt, B.C., Sloman, S.A. Conversation and convention: Enduring influences on name choice for common objects. Memory & Cognition 32, 1346–1354 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206325
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206325