Abstract
Associative interference from overlapping word pairs (A-B, A-D) reduces recall but has inconsistent effects on recognition. A dual-process account suggests that interference conditions reduce recollection but increase familiarity. This is predicted to increase recognition false alarms but have variable effects on recognition hits, depending on the relative contribution of recollection and familiarity. In three experiments that varied materials (sentences or random nouns) and test type (associative or pair recognition), interference conditions always increased recognition false alarms, but sometimes increased and sometimes decreased recognition hits. However, remember hits always decreased and know hits always increased with interference, patterns predicted of the recollection and familiarity processes, respectively. According to the dual-process view, a manipulation that affects the component processes in opposite ways can produce inconsistent patterns of recognition performance as the relative contribution of recollection and familiarity changes across tasks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 186–197.
Anderson, M. C., Green, C., &McCulloch, K. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: Evidence for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1141–1159.
Anisfield, M., &Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 171–179.
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 243–293). San Francisco: Freeman.
Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes.Psychological Science,11, 267–273.
Bodner, G. E., &Lindsay, D. S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 563–580.
Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology,2, 331–350.
Busey, T. A., &Tunnicliff, J. L. (1999). Accounts of blending, distinctiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1210–1235.
Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1101–1114.
Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 231–243.
Clark, S. E. (1999). Recalling to recognize and recognizing to recall. In C. Izawa (Ed.),On human memory: Evolution, progress, and reflections on the 30th anniversary of the Atkinson-Shiffrin model (pp. 215–243). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.
Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., &Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,29, 413–423.
Conway, M. A., &Dewhurst, S. A. (1995). Remembering, familiarity, and source monitoring.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 125–140.
Curran, H. V., Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I., &Allen, D. (1993). Effects of lorazepam upon recollective experience in recognition memory.Psychopharmacology,110, 374–378.
Dewhurst, S. A., &Conway, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1088–1098.
Dodson, C. S., Holland, P. W., &Shimamura, A. P. (1998). On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1121–1136.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Duzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H., &Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,94, 5973–5978.
Dyne, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1990). Associative interference effects in recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 813–824.
Flagg, P. W. (1976). Semantic integration in sentence memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 491–504.
Gardiner, J. M., &Gregg, V. H. (1997). Recognition memory with little or no remembering: Implications for a detection model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 474–479.
Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C. &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 1–26.
Gardiner, J. M., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229–244). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., &Kelley, C. M. (1997). The processdissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and similarity in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 259–278.
Heit, E., Brockdorff, N., &Lamberts, K. (2003). Adaptive changes of response criterion in recognition memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 718–723.
Henkel, L. A., &Franklin, N. (1998). Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects.Memory & Cognition,26, 659–673.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., &Ritschel, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 503–508.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., &Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.Memory & Cognition,26, 449–462.
Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgements: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 1–18.
Hirshman, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 302–313.
Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 103–107.
Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–65.
Hirshman, E., &Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm.Memory & Cognition,25, 345–351.
Hockley, W. E., &Consoli, A. (1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,27, 657–664.
Hockley, W. E., &Niewiadomski, M. W. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 1176–1184.
Holmes, J. B., Waters, H. S., &Rajaram, S. (1998). The phenomenology of false memories: Episodic content and confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1026–1040.
Humphreys, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 175–187.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., &Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva, and Matrix and TODAM models.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 36–67.
Inoue, C., &Bellezza, F. S. (1998). The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.Memory & Cognition,26, 299–308.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kelley, R., &Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 701–722.
King, D. R. W., &Anderson, J. R. (1976). Long-term memory search: An intersecting activation process.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 587–605.
Koutstaal, W., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 555–583.
Kučera, F., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.
McElree, B., Dolan, P. O., &Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time course analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 563–582.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., &Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1095–1110.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information.Psychological Review,100, 183–203.
Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., &Janczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.Psychological Review,105, 299–324.
Nobel, P. A., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 384–413.
Perfect, T. J., Mayes, A. R., Downes, J. J., &Van Eijk, R. (1996). Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 797–813.
Postma, A. (1999). The influence of decision criteria upon remembering and knowing in recognition memory.Acta Psychologica,103, 65–76.
Postman, L. (1976). Interference theory revisited. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 157–182). New York: Wiley.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C., &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.
Reder, L. M., &Anderson, J. R. (1980). A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,12, 447–472.
Reder, L. M., Angstadt, P., Cary, M., Erickson, M. A., &Ayers, M. S. (2002). A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: Two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 138–152.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember— know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Reitman, J. S., &Bower, G. H. (1973). Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts.Cognitive Psychology,4, 194–206.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Rohrer, D. (1996). On the relative and absolute strength of a memory trace.Memory & Cognition,24, 188–201.
Rotello, C. M., &Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing.Memory & Cognition,28, 907–922.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., &Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sumdifference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal detection model.Psychological Review,111, 588–616.
Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., &Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 47–69.
Rundus, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 43–50.
Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., &Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 267–287.
Strack, F., &Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 203–217.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology,26, 1–12.
Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.
Verde, M. F. (2004). The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,32, 1265–1272.
Verde, M. F., &Rotello, C. M. (2003). Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 739–746.
Verde, M. F., &Rotello, C. M. (2004). Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 1062–1066.
Vogt, J., &Kimble, G. A. (1973). False recognition as a function of associative proximity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 143–145.
Vokey, J. R., &Read, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.Memory & Cognition,20, 291–302.
Westerman, D. L. (2000). Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.Memory & Cognition,28, 167–175.
Westerman, D. L. (2001). The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 723–732.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002). Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 325–348.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancyattribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 3–13.
Wixted, J. T., Ghadisha, H., &Vera, R. (1997). Recall latency fol lowing pure- and mixed-strength lists: A direct test of the relative strength model of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 523–538.
Xu, M., &Bellezza, F. S. (2001). A comparison of the multimemory and detection theories of know and remember recognition judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1197–1210.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Yonelinas, A. P., &Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 622–643.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was completed while M.F.V. was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant MH16745-19. The present research was used in his doctoral dissertation at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verde, M.F. Associative interference in recognition memory: A dual-process account. Memory & Cognition 32, 1273–1283 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206318
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206318