Abstract
Recalling an item interferes with recall of related memories. Evidence is presented that retrieval interference occurs in associative recognition as well as recall. In Experiment 1, subjects studied pairs of category exemplars. Retrieval practice followed, during which some pairs appeared in a cued recall test. A final test of associative recognition (with remember—know judgments) found lower accuracy and hit rate for nonpracticed pairs belonging to retrieval-practiced categories. In Experiment 2, subjects studied noun pairs from overlapping sets, with study duration manipulated between subjects. Retrieval practice was manipulated by presenting some members of a set in a previous block during the recognition test. With long study duration, retrieval interference was evident in both recognition and remember judgments. With short study duration, it appeared only in remember judgments. These results support a dual-process account in which retrieval interference is specific to recollection and becomes evident in recognition performance only when recollection is sufficiently dominant.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review,79, 97–123.
Anderson, M. C., &Bell, T. (2001). Forgetting our facts: The role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 544–570.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., &Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 522–530.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., &Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1063–1087.
Anderson, M. C., &Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case.Psychological Review,102, 68–100.
Arndt, J., &Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 371–391.
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 243–293). San Francisco: Freeman.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (3, Pt. 2).
Bäuml, K. H. (1997). The list-strength effect: Strength-dependent competition or suppression?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 260–264.
Bäuml, K. H. (1998). Strong items get suppressed, weak items do not: The role of item strength in output interference.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 459–463.
Brown, J. (1976). An analysis of recognition and recall and of problems in their comparison. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition, (pp. 1–34). New York: Wiley.
Cameron, T. E., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: Familiarity versus recollection.Memory & Cognition,28, 176–183.
Ciranni, M. A., &Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Retrieval-induced forgetting in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,25, 1403–1414.
Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 231–243.
Clark, S. E. (1999). Recalling to recognize and recognizing to recall. In C. Izawa (Ed.),On human memory: Evolution, progress, and reflections on the 30th anniversary of the Atkinson—Shiffrin model (pp. 215–243). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, S. E., &Burchett, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall.Memory & Cognition,22, 55–62.
Clark, S. E., Hori, A., &Callan, D. E. (1993). Forced-choice associative recognition: Implications for global-memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,19, 871–881.
Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., &Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,29, 413–423.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Dyne, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1990). Associative interference effects in recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,16, 813–824.
Feingold, G. A. (1915). Recognition and discrimination.Psychological Monographs,18 (2, Whole No. 78).
Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 1–26.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Gregg, V. H., &Gardiner, J. M. (1994). Recognition memory and awareness: A large effect of study—test modalities on “know” responses following a highly perceptual orienting task.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 131–147.
Hicks, J. L., &Starns, J. J. (2004). Retrieval-induced forgetting occurs in tests of item recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 125–130.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., &Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 667–680.
Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember—know paradigm.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 103–107.
Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–65.
Hirshman, E., &Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember—know paradigm.Memory & Cognition,25, 345–351.
Hockley, W. E., Hemsworth, D. H., &Consoli, A. (1999). Shades of the mirror effect: Recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.Memory & Cognition,27, 128–138.
Humphreys, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 175–187.
Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user’s guide for the process-dissociation procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 3–26.
Jacoby, L. L., Jones, T. C., &Dolan, P. O. (1998). Two effects of repetition: Support for a dual-process model of know judgments and exclusion errors.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 705–709.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kelley, R., &Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 701–722.
Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., &Galluccio, L. (1999). Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review.Memory & Cognition,27, 478–493.
Kuçcera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgement of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., &Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1095–1110.
Nobel, P. A., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 384–413.
Norman, K. A. (2002). Differential effects of list strength on recollection and familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1083–1094.
Postma, A. (1999). The influence of decision criteria upon remembering and knowing in recognition memory.Acta Psychologica,103, 65–76.
Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 163–178.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Rotello, C. M., &Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing.Memory & Cognition,28, 907–922.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., &Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sumdifference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal detection model of remember—know judgments.Psychological Review,111, 588–616.
Rundus, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 43–50.
Shaw, J. S., III,Bjork, R. A., &Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 249–253.
Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., &Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 267–287.
Shiffrin, R. M., Ratcliff, R., &Clark, S. E. (1990). List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 179–195.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strengthbased and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Strong, M. H., &Strong, E. K. (1916). The nature of recognition memory and of the localization of recognitions.American Journal of Psychology,27, 341–362.
Watkins, M. J. (1975). Inhibition in recall with extralist “cues.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 294–303.
Westerman, D. L. (2000). Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.Memory & Cognition,28, 167–175.
Westerman, D. L. (2001). The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 723–732.
Wixted, J. T., Ghadisha, H., &Vera, R. (1997). Recall latency following pure- and mixed-strength lists: A direct test of the relative strength model of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 523–538.
Wixted, J. T., &Rohrer, D. (1994). Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 89–106.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I. G., &Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 654–661.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was completed while the author was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant MH16745-19. Some of the present research appears in the doctoral dissertation completed by the author at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2001. Special thanks to William Hockley, Michael Kahana, Ken Norman, and Caren Rotello for helpful comments on a previous version of this article, as well as to Brian Ross, Bill Brewer, Neil Cohen, Gary Dell, and Art Kramer for their comments during the course of this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verde, M.F. The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 32, 1265–1272 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206317
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206317