Abstract
Bridging inferences contribute to text coherence by identifying the connections among ideas, whereas elaborative inferences simply specify sensible extrapolations from text. Bridging inferences have been indistinguishable from explicit text ideas on numerous measures, suggesting similar longterm memory (LTM) representations for the two, whereas elaborative inferences are inferior. To evaluate the LTM representations of text ideas, we used the extended process-dissociation procedure (Buchner, Erdfelder, & Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, 1995; Jacoby, 1991) to partition the controlled, recollective contributions to text retrieval from the automatic, familiarity-based contributions. The automatic contribution to the recognition of implied concepts was consistently negligible, an outcome consistent with the absence of perceptual processing of those concepts during the original reading. In addition, the controlled basis of recognition was consistently higher for explicit than for implicit concepts, which suggests a more robust conceptual representation for explicit text ideas (Yonelinas, 2002). These results were interpreted to reflect the asymmetric representation of explicit ideas and inferences (elaborative and even bridging inferences) in the surface, propositional textbase, and situational levels of text representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1972). Configural properties in sentence memory.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 594–605.
Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring.Psychological Review,97, 548–564.
Black, J. B., &Bern, H. (1981). Causal inference and memory for events in narratives.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 267–275.
Bloom, C. P., Fletcher, C. R., van den Broek, P., Reitz, L., &Shapiro, B. P. (1990). An on-line assessment of causal reasoning during comprehension.Memory & Cognition,18, 65–71.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., &Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition.Psychological Review,106, 160–179.
Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology,2, 331–350.
Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., &Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework.Journal Experimental Psychology: General,124, 137–160.
Caldwell, J. I., &Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location.Memory & Cognition,29, 285–295.
Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.
Cook, A. E., Limber, J. E., &O’Brien, E. J. (2001). Situation-based context and the availability of predictive inferences.Journal Memory & Language,44, 220–234.
Corbett, A. T., &Dosher, B. A. (1978). Instrument inferences in sentence encoding.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 479–492.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Dehn, D. M., &Engelkamp, J. (1997). Process dissociation procedure: Double dissociations following divided attention and speeded responding.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 318–336.
Dopkins, S., Klin, C., &Myers, J. L. (1993). Accessibility of information about goals during the processing of narrative texts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 70–80.
Duffy, S. A., Shinjo, M., &Myers, J. L. (1990). The effect of encoding task on memory for sentence pairs varying in causal relatedness.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,29, 27–42.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.),Universals of linguistic theory (pp. 1–90). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1995). Relative inhibition following the encoding of bridging and predictive inferences.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 981–995.
Gardiner, J. M., Gawlik, B., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1994). Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing, not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering, not knowing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 107–110.
Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. L. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,19, 617–623.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Graf, P., &Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution!European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 113–129.
Hasher, L., &Griffin, M. (1978). Reconstructive and reproductive processes in memory.Journal Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 318–330.
Hayes-Roth, B., &Hayes-Roth, F. (1977). The prominence of lexical information in memory representations of meaning.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 119–136.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Hintzman, D. L., &Caulton, D. A. (1997). Recognition memory and modality judgments: A comparison of retrieval dynamics.Journal Memory & Language,37, 1–23.
Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall.Journal Memory & Language,33, 1–18.
Hu, X., &Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm.Psychometrika,59, 21–47.
Hu, X., &Phillips, G. A. (1999). GPT.EXE: A powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 220–234.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jacoby, J. L., Lindsay, D. S., &Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed.American Psychologist,47, 802–809.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., &Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 139–154.
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., &Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences.Journal Experimental Psychology,98, 203–205.
Joordens, S., &Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy. Two models of conscious and unconscious influences.Journal Experimental Psychology: General,122, 462–467.
Keefe, D. E., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences.Journal Memory & Language,32, 446–463.
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., &Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 115–126.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., &Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis.Journal Memory & Language,29, 133–159.
Klin, C. M. (1995). Causal inferences in reading: From immediate activation to long term memory.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1483–1494.
Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., &Levine, W. H. (1999). Prevalence and persistence of predictive inferences.Journal Memory & Language,40, 593–604.
Komatsu, S., Graf, P., &Uttl, B. (1995). Process dissociation procedure: Core assumptions fail, sometimes.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 19–40.
Levy, B. H., Campsall, J., Browne, J., Cooper, D., Waterhouse, C., &Wilson, C. (1995). Reading fluency: Episodic integration across tests.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1169–1185.
Long, D. L., &Prat, C. S. (2002). Memory for Star Trek: The role of prior knowledge in recognition revisited.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1073–1082.
Lucas, M. M., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Carlson, G. N. (1990). Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference.Memory & Cognition,18, 611–631.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Masson, M. E. (1993). Episodically enhanced comprehension fluency.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 428–465.
McDaniel, M., Schmalhofer, F., &Keefe, D. E. (2001). What is minimal about predictive inferences.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 840–846.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 82–91.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1988). Contextually relevant aspects of meaning.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 331–343.
Moravcsik, J. E., &Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 360–374.
Murdock, B. B. (1992). Item and associative information in a distributed memory model.Journal Mathematical Psychology,36, 68–99.
Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., &Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,26, 453–465.
O’Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., &Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 410–420.
Perfetti, C. A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In L. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing and learning: Issues for a cognitive science of instruction (pp. 307–335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Potts, G. R., Keenan, J. M., &Golding, J. M. (1988). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 399–415.
Ratcliff, R., van Zandt, T., &McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single process theories, and recognition memory.Journal Experimental Psychology: General,124, 352–374.
Reder, L. M. (1982). Plausibility judgements versus fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification.Psychological Review,89, 250–280.
Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy-selection in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,19, 90–134.
Rinck, M., Haehnel, A., &Becker, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 67–80.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Schmalhofer, F., &Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situation representations.Journal Memory & Language,25, 279–294.
Schmalhofer, F., McDaniel, M. A., &Keefe, D. E. (2002). A unified model for predictive and bridging inferences.Discourse Processes,33, 105–132.
Singer, M. (1980). The role of case-filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages.Discourse Processes,3, 185–201.
Singer, M. (1981). Verifying the assertions and implications of language.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 46–60.
Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego: Academic Press.
Singer, M., &Ferreira, F. (1983). Inferring consequences in story comprehension.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 437–448.
Singer, M., &Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences.Cognitive Psychology,30, 1–38.
Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C., &Andrusiak, P. (1992). Validation of causal bridging inferences.Journal Memory & Language,31, 507–524.
Singer, M., &Kintsch, W. (2001). Text retrieval: A theoretical exploration.Discourse Processes,31, 27–59.
Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Suh, S., &Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols and recognition priming.Journal Memory & Language,32, 279–300.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., &Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context.Memory & Cognition,16, 283–298.
Toth, J. P. (1996). Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 123–138.
Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1994). A response to Graf and Komatsu’s critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 113–130.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology,26, 1–12.
Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., &Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications.Journal Memory & Language,32, 141–154.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory.Journal Experimental Psychology: General,130, 361–379.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Discovery Grant OGP9800 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to M.S. and graduate fellowships from NSERC and the University of Manitoba to G.R.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, M., Remillard, G. Retrieving text inferences: Controlled and automatic influences. Memory & Cognition 32, 1223–1237 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206314
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206314