The ability to detect small differences in the positions of two lines (vernier acuity) showed some improvement with practice in all eight subjects, even for subjects given no error feedback. The average decline in threshold with training (2,000–2,500 responses) was about 40%. We used three target orientations: vertical, horizontal, and right oblique. Orientational differences remained stable in only one subject. In five subjects, orientational differences present at the beginning of training diminished or disappeared with increased experience; in two, they increased.
Astigmatism Amblyopia Practice Block Target Orientation Error Feedback
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Mcfadden, D. Three computational versions of proportion correct for use in forced choice experiments.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 336–342.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., &Westheimer, G. Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity for interference fringes on the retina.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967,57, 246–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., Millodot, M., &Haegerstrom, G. Meridional amblyopia: Evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience.Vision Research, 1973,13, 535–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tanner, W. P., &Rivette, C. L. Learning and psychophysical experiments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, C. W., &Mitchell, D. E. Orientation differences for perception of sinusoidal line stimuli.Vision Research, 1977,17, 83–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Volkmann, A. W.Physiologische Untersuchungen im Gebiete der Optik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel, 1863.Google Scholar
Westheimer, G., &Mckee, S. P. Visual acuity in the presence of retinal image motion.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1975,65, 847–850.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar