Abstract
Following each of 400 stimuli that varied according to three binary dimensions (location, color, and shape), subjects named the value of one particular dimension as quickly as possible. Each stimulus appeared on the “left” and “right” side of a screen (location dimension), and was a “red” or “green” triangle (color dimension) with apex oriented “up” or “down” (shape dimension). The alternatives of each dimension varied according to different probability distributions (90/10, 70/30, or 50/50), and three schedule conditions were contrived so that each distribution occurred once for each dimension. Nine groups of 10 subjects each defined the factorial of 3 (response conditions: identify location, color, or shape) by 3 (schedule conditions: 90 left/70 red/50 down, 70 left/50 red/90 down, or 50 left/90 red/70 down). Latencies to identify the shape dimension were influenced reliably by the probabilities of both response-relevant and response-irrelevant stimuli. Shape probabilities did not affect latencies to identify location of color, but these latencies were significantly influenced by both color and location probabilities. Results are discussed with reference to the locus of the stimulus probability effect and dimensional integrality.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ambler, B. A., &Proctor, J. D. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 222–234.
Bertelson, P., &Tisseyre, R. Choice reaction time as a function of stimulus versus response relative frequency of occurrence.Nature, 1966,212, 1069–1070.
Biederman, I. Human performance in contingent information-processing tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 219–238.
Biederman, I., &Checkosky, S. F. Processing redundant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 486–490.
Biederman, I., &Stacy, E. W. Stimulus probability and stimulus set size in memory scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 1100–1107.
Dillon, P. J. Stimulus versus response decisions as determinants of the relative frequency effect in disjunctive reaction time performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,71, 321–330.
Downing, B. D., &Grossman, J. R. Parallel processing of multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 57–60.
Egeth, H. E. Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 245–252.
Egeth, H., &Blecker, D. Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 321–326.
Felfoldy, G. L. Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 453–459.
Fitts, P. M., Peterson, J. R., &Wolpe, G. Cognitive aspects of information processing: II. Adjustments to stimulus redundancy.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 423–432.
Forrin, B., Kumler, M., &Morin.R. E. The effects of response code and signal probability in a numeral-naming task.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1966,20, 115–124.
Friden, T. P. The effects of familiarity in a perceptual matching task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 487–492.
Garner, W. R. Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 98–123.
Garner, W. R.The processing of information and structure. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1974.
Garner, W. R. The stimulus in information processing.American Psychologist, 1970,25, 350–358.
Geller, E. S., Whitman, C. P., &Farris, J. C. Probability discrimination indicated by stimulus predictions and reaction speed: Effects of S-R compatibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 404–409.
Hawkins, H. L., &Friedin, B. D. The relative frequency effect and S-R compatibility.Psychonomic Science, 1972,28, 229–230.
Hawkins, H. L., &Hosking, K. Stimulus probability as a determinant of discrete choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 435–440.
Hawkins, H. L., Thomas, G. B., &Drury, K. B. Perceptual versus response bias in discrete choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 514–517.
Hawkins, H. L., &Underhill, J. R. S-R compatibility and the relative frequency effect in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 280–286.
Kanarick, A. F. Probability and payoff as factors influencing twochoice reaction-time.Journal of Engineering Psychology, 1966,5, 37–46.
Krueger, L. E. Effect of stimulus probability on two-choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 377–379.
LaBerge, D., Legrand, R., &Hobbie, R. K. Functional identification of perceptual and response biases in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,79, 295–299.
LaBerge, D., &Tweedy, J. R. Presentation probability and choice time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 477–481.
Laberge, D., Tweedy, J. R., &Ricker, J. Selective attention: Incentive variables and choice time.Psychonomic Science, 1967,8, 341–342.
Miller, J. O., &Pachella, R. G. Locus of the stimulus probability effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 227–231.
Pachella, R. G. The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Pachella, R. G.,&Miller, J. O. Stimulus probability and same-different classification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 29–34.
Posner, M. L. Components of skilled performance.Science, 1966,152, 1712–1718.
Sanders, A. F. Some variables affecting the relation between relative stimulus frequency and choice reaction time.Acta Psychologica, 1970,33, 45–55.
Stanovich, K. E., &Pachella, R. G. The effect of stimulus probability on the speed and accuracy of naming alphanumeric stimuli.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,8, 281–284.
Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments.American Scientist, 1969,57, 421–457.
Theios, J. Reaction time measurements in the study of memory processes: Theory and data. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
geller, E.S. Latencies to name one of three stimulus dimensions: A study of probability effects and dimension integrality. Perception & Psychophysics 22, 70–76 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206082
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206082