Abstract
Results from research with the flanker task have been used to argue both that flankers are identified without attention and that flanker identificatin requires attention. In three experiments, we addressed this issue by examining flanker recall. In Experiment 1, we manipulated flanker redundancy, a variable that could influence attention to the flankers, in order to determine whether it affected the magnitude of the flanker effect, the magnitude of flanker recall, or both. Redundancy did not influence the flanker effect, and recall was high in both conditions, suggesting that the flankers were attended. The recall results contradicted those of Miller (1987), the only other study that we could find in which flanker recall was used. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined differences between Miller’s procedure and ours. Although flanker recall was lower when open-ended rather than forced recall was used and when the flanker task was made more complicated, flanker recall remained well above chance in all conditions. The data strongly suggest that in the typical correlated flanker task there is a failure of selective attention at some point during processing such that flankers receive attentional processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baylis, G. C, &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Carlson, K. A., &Flowers, J. H. (1996). Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 460–470.
Chastain, G., Cheal, M., &Lyon, D. R. (1996). Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 300–309.
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.
Curran, T., &Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 189–202.
Deutsch, J. A., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90.
Eich, E. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness.Memory & Cognition,12, 105–111.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W. &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Evans, P. M., &Craig, J. C. (1992). Response competition: A major source of interference in a tactile identification task.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 199–206.
Fisk, A. D., &Schneider, W. (1984). Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 181–197.
Flowers, J. H. (1990). Priming effects in perceptual classification.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 135–148.
Flowers, J.H..&Wilcox, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 581–591.
Fournier, L. R., &Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 538–550.
Harms, L., &Bundesen, C. (1983). Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 11–19.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 356–388.
Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 1–23.
Johnston, W. A., &Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention.Annual Review of Psychology,37, 43–75.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D., &Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic Press.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Lambert, A. J. (1985, Fall). Selectivity and stages of processing—An enduring controversy in attentional theory: A review.Current Psychological Research & Reviews, pp. 239–256.
Lambert, A. J., &Sumich, A. L. (1996). Spatial orienting controlled without awareness: A semantically based implicit learning effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 490–518.
Lewicki, P., Hill, T., &Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information.American Psychologist,47, 796–801.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,28, 103–174.
McCann, R. S., Folk, C. L., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1015–1029.
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.Cognitive Psychology,14, 247–279.
Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 419–434.
Miller, J. (1991 ). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 270–288.
Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.)Cognition and motor processes (pp. 255–293). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review,84, 231–279.
Paquet, L., &Lortie, C. (1990). Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 382–388.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rock, I., &Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 275–285.
Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 91–105.
Scheerhorn, P. A., & Dark, V. J. (1994, May).“Unattended” processing of symmetric and asymmetric flankers? Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Scheerhorn, P. A., & Dark, V. J. (1995, May).Where/when is attention focused in the flanker task? Paper presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Shiffrin, R. M., Diller, D., &Cohen, A. (1996). Processing visual information in an unattended location. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.)Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 225–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
Stadler, M. A. (1992). Statistical structure and implicit serial learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 318–327.
Stadler, M. A., & Proctor R. W. (1993, November).Attention and covariation learning in the Eriksen flanker task. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Taylor, D. A. (1977). Time course of context effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 404–426.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 381–391.
Yantis, S., &Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 135–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, P.A., Dark, V.J. Attentional processing of “unattended” flankers: Evidence for a failure of selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 60, 227–238 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206032
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206032