Abstract
Using monocular observation, open-loop measurements were obtained of the perceptions of linear size, angular size, and sagittal motion associated with the terminal (largest or smallest) stimuli of repetitive optical expansions and contractions using 1-D or 2-D displays produced on a video monitor at a constant distance from the observer. The perceptions from these dynamic conditions were compared with those from static conditions in which the stimuli were of the same physical size and at the same physical distance as the terminal dynamic stimuli, but that were not part of the optical expansions or contractions. One result, as expected, was that the measures of perceived linear and angular size differed, but also, unexpectedly, some substantial errors were associated with the measures of perceived angular size. Another result was that the amount of size constancy was considerably less than was expected from the obtained amount of perceived motion in depth. Consistent with the latter result, it was found that the size-distance invariance hypothesis (SDIH), using the physical visual angles of the terminal stimuli, predicted only about half of the perceived motion in depth obtained with the dynamic changes. Using the obtained measures of perceived visual angles in the SDIH increased rather than decreased the error in predicting the amount of motion in depth as perceived. An additional experiment suggests that at least some of the error in the measurement of the perceived visual angle is a consequence of error in the perceived origin of the visual angles. The absence of the expected relation between size constancy and perceived motion in depth in the dynamic conditions is hypothesized to be due to cognitive processes associated with off-sized perceptions of the stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Börjesson, E., &Von Hofsten, C. (1972). Spatial determinants of depth perception in two-dot motion patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 263–268.
Cheng, M. F. (1968). Tactile-kinesthetic perception of length.American Journal of Psychology,81, 74–82.
Davidon, R. S., &Cheng, M. F. (1964). Apparent distance in a horizontal plane with tactile-kinesthetic stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 277–281.
Emmert, E. (1881). Grossenverhältnisse der Nachbilder.Klinische Monatsblatt für Augenheilkunde,19, 443–450.
Foley, J. M. (1967). Binocular disparity and perceived relative distance: An examination of two hypotheses.Vision Research,7, 655–670.
Foley, J. M. (1968). Depth, size and distance in stereoscopic vision.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 265–274.
Gillam, B., &Chambers, D. (1985). Size and position are incongruous: Measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 549–556.
Gogel, W. C. (1964). The perception of depth from binocular disparity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 379–386.
Gogel, W. C. (1969). The effect of object familiarity on the perception of size and distance.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,21, 239–241.
Gogel, W. C. (1971). The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 92–94.
Gogel, W. C. (1976). An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 419–429.
Gogel, W. C. (1981). The role of suggested size in distance responses.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 149–155.
Gogel, W. C. (1990). A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 105–123.
Gogel, W. C., &Da Silva, J. A. (1987). Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 318–328.
Gogel, W. C., &Newton, R. E. (1969). Perception of off-sized objects.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 7–9.
Gogel, W. C., Wist, E. R., &Harker, G. S. (1963). A test of the invariance of the ratio of perceived size to perceived distance.American Journal of Psychology,76, 537–553.
Hershenson, M. (1992a). The perception of shrinking in apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 671–675.
Hershenson, M. (1992b). Size-distance invariance: Kinetic invariance is different from static invariance.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 541–548.
Hershenson, M. (1993). Structural constraints: Further evidence from apparent motion in depth.Perception,22, 323–334.
Higashiyama, A. (1992). Anisotropic perception of visual angle: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion, overconstancy of size, and the moon illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 218–230.
Higashiyama, A., &Shimono, K. (1994). How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 429–442.
Johansson, G. (1950).Configurations in event perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Almquist & Wiksell.
Johansson, G. (1964). Perception of motion and changing form.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,5, 181–208.
Johansson, G. (1977). Spatial constancy and motion in visual perception. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 375–419). New York: Wiley.
Loomis, J. M., &Eby, D. W. (1987). High-speed 2-D and 3-D animation on the IBM PC/XT/AT.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,19, 10–18.
Mack, A., Heuer, F., Villardi, K., &Chambers, D. (1985). The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 335–344.
McCready, D. (1965). Size-distance perception and accommodationconvergence micropsia-A critique.Vision Research,5, 189–206.
McCready, D. (1985). On size, distance, and visual angle perception.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 323–334.
McCready, D. (1986). Moon illusions redescribed.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 64–72.
Mershon, D. H., &Lembo, V. L. (1977). Scalar perceptions of distance in simple binocular configurations.American Journal of Psychology,90, 17–28.
Mitson, L., Ono, H., &Barbeito, R. (1976). Three methods of measuring the location of the egocentre: Their reliability, comparative locations and intercorrelations.Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie,30, 1–8.
Noguchi, K., &Taya, K. (1981). A neglected problem: Kinetic size constancy.Acta Psychologica,48, 187–194.
Ono, H. (1970). Some thoughts on different perceptual tasks related to size and distance. In J. C. Baird (Ed.),Human space perception: Proceedings of the Dartmouth Conference (Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, Vol. 3, No. 13 [Whole No. 45], pp. 137–218). Austin, TX: Psychonomic Journals.
Ono, H. (1991). Binocular visual directions of an object when seen as single or double. In D. Regan (Ed.),Binocular vision (Vol. 9, pp. 1–18). New York: Macmillan.
Ono, H., &Comerford, J. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 91–128). New York: Wiley.
Ono, H., &Nakamizo, S. (1977). Saccadic eye movements during changes in fixation to stimuli at different distances.Vision Research,17, 233–238.
Ono, M. E., Rivest, J., &Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 331–337.
Oyama, T. (1974). Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 175–181.
Predebon, J. (1994a). Convergence responses to monocularly viewed objects: Implications for distance perception.Perception,23, 303–319.
Predebon, J. (1994b). Perceived size of familiar objects and the theory of off-sized perceptions.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 238–247.
Predebon, J. (1995).Open-loop pointing responses to the location of the vertices of Müller-Lyer figures. Unpublished manuscript.
Predebon, J., &Woolley, J. S. (1994). The familiar-size cue to depth under reduced-cue viewing conditions.Perception,23, 1301–1312.
Richards, W. (1969).The influence of oculomotor systems on visual perception (69-1934 TR Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Cambridge, MA: Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Rock, I. (1983).The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Swanston, M. T., &Gogel, W. C. (1986). Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 309–326.
Teghtsoonian, M., &Teghtsoonian, R. (1965). Seen and felt length.Psychonomic Science,3, 465–466.
Wallach, H., &Zuckerman, C. (1963). The constancy of stereoscopic depth.American Journal of Psychology,76, 404–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The preparation of this article was supported by Research Grant MH 39457 from the National Institute of Mental Health to W.C.G. The research was conducted at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gogel, W.C., Eby, D.W. Measures of perceived linear size, sagittal motion, and visual angle from optical expansions and contractions. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 783–806 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206024
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206024