Abstract
In this paper, we examine whether color and shape, tied to a single object in space, (1) are identified and selected in series or in parallel, (2) are identified and selected in a dependent, self-terminating manner or in an independent and exhaustive manner, and (3) are conjoined by a feature integration process before or only after an initial stage of separate attribute analyses has finished. We measured response time and the selection negativity (SN) derived from event-related brain potentials when participants responded to a unique conjunction of color and shape in a go/no-go target detection task. The discriminability of the color and the shape of the conjunction was manipulated in three conditions. When color and shape were easy to discriminate, the SNs to color and shape started at the same time. When one attribute was less discriminable, the SN to that attribute started later, but not the SN to the complementary attribute. This suggests that color and shape are identified and selected in parallel. In all three discriminability conditions, the SNs to color and shape were initially independent but later interacted. This suggests that color and shape are initially selected independently and exhaustively, after which their conjunction is analyzed. The SN to local shape features started later than that to the conjunction of color and global shape features, which suggests that feature integration can start before the analyses of the separate attributes have finished.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arguin, M., &Cavanagh, P. (1988). Parallel processing of two disjunctive targets.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 22–30.
Biederman, I., &Checkosky, S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 486–490.
Desimone, R., &Ungerleider, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Egeth, H. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 245–252.
Ellis, S. H., &Chase, W. G. (1971). Parallel processing in item recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 379–384.
Felfoldy, G. L., &Garner, W. R. (1971). The effects on speeded classification of implicit and explicit instructions regarding redundant dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 289–292.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R. (1987). Location and color as cuing dimensions in contingent classification.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 202–210.
Grill, D. P. (1971). Variables influencing the mode of processing of complex stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 51–57.
Guthrie, D., &Buchwald, J. S. (1991). Significance testing of difference potentials.Psychophysiology,28, 240–244.
Hansen, J. C., &Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Selective attention to multidimensional auditory stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 1–19.
Harter, M. R., &Aine, C. J. (1984). Brain mechanisms of visual selective attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 293–321). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harter, M. R., &Aine, C. J. (1986). Discussion of the neural-specificity model of selective attention: A response to Hillyard & Mangun and Näätänen.Biological Psychology,23, 297–312.
Hawkins, H. L. (1969). Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 56–64.
Hillyard, S. A., &Mangun, G. R. (1986). The neural basis of visual selective attention: A commentary on Harter and Aine.Biological Psychology,23, 265–279.
Hillyard, S. A., &Münte*****, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 185–198.
Hillyard, S. A., &Picton, T. W. (1987). Electrophysiology of cognition. In F. Plum (Ed.),Handbook of physiology: Sec. 1. The nervous system: Vol. 5. Higher function of the nervous system, Part 2 (pp. 519–584). Baltimore, MD: American Physiological Society.
Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327.
Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., &Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 51–63.
Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin,112, 24–38.
Kutas, M., &Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials.Brain Research,202, 95–115.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related potentials and cognition (pp. 86–131). New York: Oxford University Press.
McClean, J. P., Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1982). Combining attributes in rapid sequential visual presentation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 171–186.
Miller, J. O. (1988). Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results.Acta Psychologica,67, 191–257.
Mordkoff, J. T., &Yantis, S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 357–366.
Näätänen, R. (1992).Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 516–540.
Posner, M. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rugg, M. D. (1991). ERPs and selective attention: Commentary.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology (Suppl. 42), 222–227.
Saraga, E., &Shallice, T. (1973). Parallel processing of the attributes of single stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 261–270.
Scherg, M. (1992).Brain electrical source analysis: Version 1.9 [Computer software]. Munich: Scherg & Berg.
Smid, H. G. O. M., Böcker, K. B. E., van Touw, D. A., Mulder, G., &Brunia, C. H. M. (1996). A psychophysiological investigation of the selection and use of partial stimulus information in response choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 3–24.
Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., Mulder, L. J. M., &Brands, G. J. (1992). A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus response translation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1101–1119.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1980). Comparing parallel and serial models: Theory and implementation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 330–354.
Townsend, J. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1983).Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Treisman, A. [M.] (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. [D.] Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, wareness, and control. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. M., &Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention and object perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 12–31.
van der Heijden, A. H. C., La Heij, W., Phaf, R. H., Buijs, D. A. C. H., &van Vliet, E. C. (1988). Response competition and condition competition in visual selective attention.Acta Psychologica,67, 259–277.
Watanabe, T. (1988). Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in thesame—different task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 132–142.
Wijers, A. A. (1989).Visual selective attention: An electrophysiological approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Wijers, A. A., Lamain, W., Slopsema, S., Mulder, G., &Mulder, L. J. M. (1989). An electrophysiological investigation of the spatial distribution of attention to colored stimuli in focussed and divided attention conditions.Biological Psychology,29, 213–245.
Wijers, A. A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., &Mulder, L. J. M. (1989). Event-related potentials during memory search and selective attention to letter size and conjunction of letter size and color.Psychophysiology,26, 529–547.
Woods, D. L., &Alain, C. (1993). Feature processing during high-rate auditory selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 391–402.
Woods, D. L., Alho, K., &Algazi, A. (1994). Stages of auditory feature conjunction: An event-related brain potential study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 81–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smid, H.G.O.M., Jakob, A. & Heinze, H.J. The organization of multidimensional selection on the basis of color and shape: An event-related brain potential study. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 693–713 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206016
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206016