Abstract
Three experiments were designed to investigate naive observers’ abilities at discriminating the rotational velocities of two simultaneously viewed objects. In Experiment 1, rotations could occur about parallel or orthogonal axes, with initial orientations in phase or out of phase, and (for parallel rotational axes) in the same or opposite direction. Differential thresholds were approximately 10%. In Experiment 2, stimulus objects differed in the number of faces revealed in rotation (three vs. four). Observers’ response curves had no greater spread, but their PSEs (points of subjective equality) were shifted such that there was a partial compensation. for faces revealed per unit time. In both Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, performance was consistent across rotational axis and directional conditions. In Experiment 3, the effect of object size was examined, in order to determine the extent to which angular velocity judgments are influenced by the tangential velocity of the faces. When the comparison cube’s edges were half the length of the standard’s, PSEs were elevated 18.5%. Taken together, these data suggest that observers are able to discriminate angular velocities with a competence near that for linear velocities. However, perceived angular rate is influenced by structural aspects of the stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, J. F. (1931). The visual perception of velocity.Psychologische Forschung,14, 249–268.
Cortese, J. M., &Andersen, G. J. (1989). The perception of 3-D shape from defonning contours.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,30(Suppl.), 250.
Lappin, J. S., Bell, H. H., Harm, O. J., &Kottas, B. (1975). On the relation between time and space in the visual discrimination of velocity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 383–394.
Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 467–477.
McKee, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection,Vision Research,21, 491–500.
Pollick, F. E. (1989). Shape perception from dynamic occluding contours.Investigative Ophthalmology& Visual Science,30(Suppl.), 264.
Proffitt, D. R., Kaiser, M. K., & Wheelan, S. M. (in press). Understanding wheel dynamics.Cognitive Psychology.
Rock, I., Hill, A. L., &Fineman, M. (1968). Speed constancy as a function of size constancy.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 37–40.
Sakata, H., Shibutani, H., Ito, Y., &Tsurugai, K. (1986). Parictal cortical neurons responding to rotary movement of visual stimulus in space.Experimental Brain Research,61, 658–663.
Smith, O. W., &Sherlock, C. (1957). A new explanation of the velocity transposition phenomenon.American Journal of Psychology,70, 102–105.
Ullman, S. (1979).The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaiser, M.K. Angular velocity discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 47, 149–156 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205979
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205979