Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article
Tops are more salient than bottoms
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Published: January 1999

Tops are more salient than bottoms

  • Kenneth W. Chambers1,
  • Michael K. McBeath2,
  • Diane J. Schiano3 &
  • …
  • Eric G. Metz1 

Perception & Psychophysics volume 61, pages 625–635 (1999)Cite this article

  • 483 Accesses

  • 32 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Past research has verified that observers assume that objects are reliably oriented with respect to a gravitationally centered coordinate system. Observers also appear to attend more to specific parts of objects, like faces, that typically are closer to the top. In the present work, we explored whether or not observers have a generic bias to view tops as being more salient than bottoms. In three experiments, observers indicated whether random shapes appeared to be more similar to comparison shapes that shared identical tops rather than bottoms. Observers exhibited a reliable tendency to match figures with similarly shaped tops. Matching choice was also a function of global shape attributes such as axis of elongation or size. The findings are consistent with the notion that, in nature, tops tend to be the most visible part and to provide the best information with respect to important aspects of objects such as animal intentionality and artifact functionality.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Antonovsky, H. F., &Ghent, L. (1964). Cross-cultural consistency of children’s preferences for the orientation of figures.American Journal of Psychology,77, 295–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1954).Art and visual perception. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attneave, F. (1955). Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns.American Journal of Psychology,68, 209–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V. (1988).Recognising faces. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., &Clark, E. V. (1977).Psychology and language: An introduction topsycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., &Shepard, R. (1981). Shape, orientation, and apparent rotational motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N., &Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghent, L. (1961). Form and its orientation: A child’s-eye view.American Journal of Psychology,74, 177–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, W. G. (1998). Effects of outline shape in object recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur, P., Ingleton, M., Bartram, L., &Booth, K. (1993). Topbottom and front-behind decisions on rotated objects.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 657–677.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerpelman, L. C., &Pollack, R. H. (1964). Developmental changes in the location of form discrimination cues.Perceptual & Motor Skills,19, 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ot]Mamassian, P., & Landy, M. S. (1996, April).A prior for shape-from-contour. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, M. K., Schiano, D. J., &Tversky, B. (1997). Three-dimensional bilateral symmetry bias in judgments of figural identity and orientation.Psychological Science,8, 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, K., &McBeath, M. K. (1992). Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction.Vision Research,32, 1137–1141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, T., Gamble, E., &Little, J. (1988). Parallel integration of vision modules.Science,242, 436–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse, D. (1780, March).Explanation of an optical deception. Paper presented to the American Philosophical Society.

  • Rock, I. (1973).Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiano, D. J., McBeath, M. K., & Bruner, K. W. (1994, November).Orientation-constraining heuristics for interpreting figures as 3-D objects. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.

  • Schiano, D. J., McBeath, M. K., & Chambers, K. W. (1999).Random shapes are interpreted as silhouettes of bilaterally symmetric objects with tops on the axis. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Schiano, D. J., &Tversky, B. (1992). Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs.Memory & Cognition,20, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps.Cognition,18, 161–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terzopoulos, D., Witkin, A., &Kass, M. (1987). Symmetry-seeking models and 3D object reconstruction.International Journal of Computer Vision,1, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion.Perception,9, 483–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., &Schiano, D. J. (1989). Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps.Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: General,118, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E., Dion, J., Rosenblatt, E., &Gardiner, H. (1987). Do lateral or vertical reversals affect balance in paintings?Visual Arts Research,13, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., &Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of features.Vision Research,37, 25–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus, A. L. (1967).Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kent State University, Kent, Ohio

    Kenneth W. Chambers & Eric G. Metz

  2. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

    Michael K. McBeath

  3. Interval Research Corporation, Palo Alto, California

    Diane J. Schiano

Authors
  1. Kenneth W. Chambers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael K. McBeath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diane J. Schiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric G. Metz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth W. Chambers.

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from Interval Research Corp.

—Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chambers, K.W., McBeath, M.K., Schiano, D.J. et al. Tops are more salient than bottoms. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 625–635 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205535

Download citation

  • Received: 02 June 1997

  • Accepted: 27 February 1998

  • Issue Date: January 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205535

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Comparison Figure
  • Stimulus Figure
  • Random Shape
  • Inverted Orientation
  • Comparison Shape
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

35.172.165.64

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature