Abstract
Two hypotheses concerning the relation between phoneme and syllable categories are contrasted. The phonological hypothesis holds that phoneme categories are perceptually basic, whereas syllable categories are abstract and specify the phonological rules operating on phoneme categories. The integrative routine hypothesis suggests that whereas phoneme categories are basic, syllable categories are not entirely abstract but are represented at least partially on the basis of higher order perceptual information, specifying the dynamics of coarticulating phoneme categories. Three experiments used a primed naming task in which subjects had to name the entire syllable (consonant-vowel and vowel-consonant; Experiment 1), the syllable-initial phoneme category (Experiment 2), or the syllable-final phoneme category (Experiment 3). The results supported the integrative routine hypothesis. S.D. is a postdoctoral fellow of the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ades, A. E. (1974). How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 61–66.
Browman, C., &Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology.Phonology Yearbook,3, 219- 252.
Browman, C., &Goldstein, L. (1988). Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology.Phonetica,45, 140–155.
Browman, C., &Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units.Phonology Yearbook,5, 201–251.
Browman, C., &Goldstein, L. (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.),Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech (pp. 341–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, J., &Yallop, C. (1990).An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cole, R., &Scott, B. (1973). Perception of temporal order in speech: The role of vowel transitions.Canadian Journal of Psychology,27, 441–449.
Cole, R., &Scott, B. (1974). Toward a theory of speech perception.Psychological Review,81, 348–374.
Collier, R., &Droste, F. (1982).Fonetiek en Fonologie [Phonetics and phonology]. Leuven: Acco.
Decoene, S. (1993). Testing the speech unit hypothesis with the primed matching task: Phoneme categories are perceptually basic.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 601–616.
Decoene, S., & Timperman, K. (1996).Lexical effects on primed phoneme and syllable matching. Phoneme categories remain perceptually basic. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Dorman, M. F., Cutting, J. E., &Raphaël, L. J. (1975). Perception of temporal order in vowel sequences with and without formant transitions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,104[1], 121–129.
Elman, J., &McClelland, J. (1986). Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave. In J. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.),Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 360–380). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Foss, D., &Swinney, D. (1973). On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification, and consciousness.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 246–257.
Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirk, R. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 93–107.
Levelt, P. (1989).Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, P., &Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?Cognition,50, 239–269.
Massaro, D.W. (1987).Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Massaro, D.W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,21, 398–421.
Massaro, D. W., &Cohen, M. C. (1983). Phonological context in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 338–348.
Massaro, D. W., &Cohen, M. C. (1991). Integration and interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 558–614.
McClelland, J. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 1–44.
Medin, D., &Barsalou, L. (1987). Categorization processes and categorical perception. In. S. Harnad (Ed.),Categorical perception (pp. 455–490). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Müler, J., &Volaitis, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 505–512.
Mills, C. (1980a). Effects of context on reaction time to phonemes.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 75–83.
Mills, C. (1980b). Effects of the match between listener expectancies and coarticulatory cues on the perception of speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 528–535.
Nearey, T. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception.Journal of Phonetics,18, 347–373.
Nearey, T. (1991). Perception: Automatic and cognitive processes. InProceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 40–49). Aix-en-Provence, France: Publications de l’Université de Provence.
Nearey, T. (1992). Context effects in a double-weak theory of speech perception.Language & Speech,35, 153–171.
Pisoni, D. B., &Luce, P. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition.Cognition,25, 21–51.
Pisoni, D. B., &Tash, J. (1975). Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 401–408.
Pols, L. (1977).Spectral analysis and identification of Dutch vowels in monosyllabic words. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven: IPO.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 669–682). London: Academic Press.
Samuel, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 307–314.
Samuel, A. G. (1989). Insights from a failure of selective adaptation: Syllable-initial and syllable-final consonants are different.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 485–493.
Samuel, A. G., Kat, D., &Tartter, V. (1984). Which syllable does an intervocalic stop belong to? A selective adaptation study.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76, 1652–1663.
Sawusch, J. (1977). Processing of place information in stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 417–426.
Strange, W. (1989). Evolving theories of vowel perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 2081–2087.
Sussman, H. (1984). A neuronal model for syllable representation.Brain & Language,22, 167–177.
Sussman, H. (1986). A neuronal model of vowel normalization and representation.Brain & Language,28, 12–23.
Sussman, H. (1989). Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: Human language analogs to the barn owl.Psychological Review,96, 631–642.
Whalen, D. H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 284–292.
Wolf, C. G. (1978). Perceptual invariance for stop consonants in different positions.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 315–326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported here is part of his doctoral dissertation,The perceptual representation of phoneme and syllable categories(supervisor: G. Govaerts).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Decoene, S. The representational basis of syllable categories. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 877–884 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205505
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205505