Abstract
We report data bearing on the ability of European starlings to generalize a serial auditory pitch pattern discrimination from one frequency range to another. In earlier research (e.g., Hulse & Cyrix, 1985), European starlings failed to generalize such a discrimination from one 1-octave range of frequencies to another 1-octave range above or below the initial training range. The starlings thus demonstrated a hitherto unknown phenomenon, thefrequency range constraint. In the present research, we first explored the frequency limits over which the range constraint might hold. The constraint was obtained after initial training in both a narrow (1÷2-octave) and a wide (3-octave) training range. The latter range encompasses a substantial portion of the entire frequency range audible to starlings. Therefore, the constraint is independent of the size of the training range. No known principles of stimulus discrimination or generalization account for the constraint. We also obtained further evidence on starlings’ sensitivity to relative pitch in auditory pattern perception. We used probe stimuli to explore pattern discrimination in narrow local regions of the wide frequency range. The probe data showed that, in spite of the frequency range constraint, the starlings were able to process pitch patterns on a relational basis. The results join earlier data indicating that both absolute and relative pitch processing may be involved in the natural auditory communication of songbirds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becker, P. H. (1982). The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller (Eds.),Acoustic communication in birds (Vol. 1, pp. 214–252). New York: Academic Press.
Braaten, R. F., Hulse, S. H., & Page, S. C. (in press).Discrimination and classification of rising and nonrising pitch patterns by the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).Animal Learning & Behavior.
Cynx, J., Hulse, S. H., &Polyzois, S. (1986). A psychophysical measure of pitch discrimination loss resulting from a frequency range constraint in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,12, 394–402.
D’Amato, M. R. (1988). A search for tonal pattern perception in cebus monkeys: Why monkeys can’t hum a tune.Music Perception,5, 453–480.
Deutsch, D. (Ed.) (1982).The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press.
Dooling, R. J., Okanoya, K., Downing, J., &Hulse, S. [H.] (1986). Hearing in the starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Absolute thresholds and critical ratios.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 462–464.
Green, D. M. (1976).An introduction to hearing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hill, B. G., &Lean, M. R. (1987). Function of frequency-shifted songs of black capped chickadees.Condor,89, 914–915.
Hulse, S. H., &Cynx, J. (1985). Relative pitch perception is constrained by absolute pitch in songbirds (Mimus, Molothrus, andSturnus).Journal of Comparative Psychology,99, 176–196.
Hulse, S. H., &Cynx, J. (1986). Interval and contour in serial pitch perception by a passerine bird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).Journal of Comparative Psychology,100, 215–228.
Hulse, S. H., Cynx, J., &Humpal, J. (1984). Absolute and relative pitch discrimination in serial pitch perception by birds.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 38–54.
Hulse, S. H., &Page, S. C. (1988). Toward a comparative psychology of music perception.Music Perception,5, 427–452.
Hulse, S. H., Page, S. C., &Braaten, R. F. (1990). An integrative approach to serial pattern learning, music perception, and comparative acoustic perception. In M. Berkley & W. C. Stebbins (Eds.),Comparative perception (Vol. 2, pp. 3–34). New York: Wiley.
McKee, J. P., &Riley, D. A. (1962). Auditory transposition in six-year-old children.Child Development,33, 469–476.
Nowicki, S. (1983). Flock-specific recognition of chickadee calls.Behavioral & Ecological Sociobiology,12, 317–320.
Page, S. C., Hulse, S. H., &Cynx, J. (1989). Relative pitch perception in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Further evidence for an elusive phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 137–146.
Park, T., &Dooling, R. J. (1985). Perception of species-specific contact calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Journal of Comparative Psychology,99, 391–402.
Ratcliffe, L., &Weisman, R. G. (1985). Frequency shift in the fee bee song of the black-capped chickadee.Condor,87, 555–556.
Ratcliffe, L., &Weisman, R. G. (1987). Phrase order recognition by brown-headed cowbirds.Animal Behavior,35, 1260–1262.
Riley, D. A., &McKee, J. P. (1963). Pitch and loudness transposition in children and adults.Child Development,34, 471–482.
Riley, D. A., McKee, J. P., &Hadley, R. W. (1964). Prediction of auditory discrimination learning and transposition from children’s auditory ordering ability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 324–329.
Trehub, S. E. (1987). Infants’ perception of musical patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 635–641.
Weisman, R. G., &Ratcliffe, L. (1987). How birds identify species information in song: A pattern recognition approach.Learning & Motivation,18, 80–98.
Weisman, R. G., &Ratcliffe, L. (1989). Absolute and relative pitch processing in black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus).Animal Behavior,38, 685–692.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research reported in this paper was supported by National Science Foundation Research Grants BNS 8606307 and BNS 8911046, and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship to Suzanne C. Page.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hulse, S.H., Page, S.C. & Braaten, R.F. Frequency range size and the frequency range constraint in auditory perception by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Animal Learning & Behavior 18, 238–245 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205281
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205281