Abstract
Pigeons acquired a serial conditional discrimination in which the onset of one of two colors (the instructional cue) on the center key preceded the onset of a white light (the trial cue) on one of two side keys. An autoshaping preparation was employed, in which food was delivered depending upon the color-side combination. Five groups of birds were studied at instructional cue durations of either 30 or 60 sec, and trial cue durations of 3, 6, or 12 sec. These temporal parameters allowed for different ratios of the instructional stimulus duration (I) to the trial stimulus duration (T), while keeping the absolute duration of the instructional stimulus constant, and for different absolute durations of the instructional stimulus, while keeping the I/T ratio constant. These manipulations were studied with either a 30 or a 60-sec cycle (the interval between the onset of the intertriai interval and the offset of the trial cue), thus permitting examination of the cycle duration to trial duration ratios as well. The results showed that the larger the value of I relative to that of T, the greater the final level of accuracy; this implicates the I/T ratio as a controlling variable. In contrast, the larger the cycle duration (C) relative to T, the greater the rate of responding to the trial stimulus, which is consistent with previous findings in autoshaping studies. These results suggest that whereas the C/T ratio directly influences response rate, the I/T ratio affects accuracy in a serial conditional discrimination.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blough, D. S. (1959). Delayed matching in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,2, 151–160.
Carter, D. E., &Eckerman, D. A. (1975). Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations.Science,187, 662–664.
Carter, D. E., &Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 565–601.
Cooper, L. D., &Brownstein, A. J. (1985). Immediacy of reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons.Psychological Record,35, 353–364.
Cumming, W. W., &Berryman, R. (1961). Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,4, 281–284.
Cumming, W. W., &Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cumming, W. W., Berryman, R., &Cohen, L. (1965). Acquisition and transfer of zero-delay matching.Psychological Reports,17, 435–445.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing.Psychological Review,84, 279–325.
Gibbon, J., Baldock, M. D., Locurto, C. M., Gold, L., &Terrace, H. S. (1977). Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 264–284.
Gibbon, J., &Balsam, P. D. (1981). The spread of association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. G. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219–254). New York: Academic Press.
Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., Locurto, C. M., Duncan, H. J., &Terrace, H. S. (1980). Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 45–59.
Gormezano, I., &Moore, J. W. (1969). Classical conditioning. In M. H. Marx (Ed.),Learning: Processes (pp. 120–203). Toronto: Macmillan.
Grant, D. S. (1975). Proactive interference in pigeon short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 207–220.
Heinemann, E. G., &Chase, S. (1970). Conditional stimulus control.Journal of Experimental Psychology,84, 187–197.
Holland, P. C. (1983). “Occasion-setting” in conditional discriminations. In M. Commons, R. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Harvard Symposium on the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior: Discrimination processes, Vol. IV (pp. 183–206). New York: Ballinger.
Holland, P. C., &Block, H. (1983). Evidence for unique cue in positive patterning.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 297–300.
Holt, G. L., &Shafer, J. N. (1973). Function of intertrial interval in matching-to-sample.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,19, 181–186.
Honig, W. K. (1978). Studies of working memory in the pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 211–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1980). Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli.Psychological Bulletin,87, 351–378.
Looney, T. A., Cohen, L. R., Brady, J. H., &Cohen, P. S. (1977). Conditional discrimination performance by pigeons on a response-independent procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,27, 363–370.
Maki, W. S., Moe, J. C., &Bierley, C. M. (1977). Short-term memory for stimuli, responses, and reinforcers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 156–177.
Maki, W. S., Jr.,Riley, D. A., &Leith, C. R. (1976). The role of test stimuli in matching to compound samples by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,4, 13–21.
Perkins, C. C., Beavers, W. O., Hancock, R. A., Hemmendinger, P. C., Hemmendinger, D., &Ricci, J. A. (1975). Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,24, 59–72.
Roberts, W. A. (1972). Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 74–83.
Roberts, W. A., &Grant, D. S. (1974). Short-term memory in the pigeon with presentation time precisely controlled.Learning & Motivation,5, 393–408.
Roberts, W. A., &Kraemer, P. J. (1982). Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes,8, 342–353.
Roberts, W. A., &Kraemer, P. J. (1984). Temporal variables in delayed matching to sample. In J. Gibbon & L. G. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (pp. 335–345). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Saavedra, M. A. (1975). Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit.Learning & Motivation,6, 314–326.
Terrace, H. S., Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., &Baldock, M. D. (1975). Temporal factors influencing the acquisition and maintenance of an autoshaped keypeck.Animal Learning & Behavior,3, 53–62.
Thomas, D. R. (1985). Contextual stimulus control of operant responding in pigeons. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.),Context and learning (pp. 295–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thomas, D. R., Stengel, T., Sherman, L., &Woodford, M. (1987). Factors affecting conditional discrimination learning by pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,48, 277–287.
Walter, D. E., &Palya, W. L. (1984). An inexpensive experiment controller for stand-alone applications or distributed processing networks.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 125–134.
Williams, B. A. (1982). On the failure and facilitation of conditional discrimination.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,38, 265–280.
Williams, B. A. (1984). Relative stimulus validity in conditional discrimination.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 117–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Aaron J. Brownstein.
This study represents a major part of the author’s doctoral dissertation, submitted to the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Members of the dissertation committee were G. Rosenkrantz, P. S. Lawrence, S. Keane, and T. J. Johnston, with Richard Shull serving as chairperson. The author is especially grateful to Richard Shull, John Gibbon, and Peter Balsam for their advice and encouragement.
The manuscript was prepared while the author was the recipient of a National Research Service Award (NRSA) Postdoctoral Fellowship, MH-18264, at the New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, L.D. Some temporal factors affecting conditional discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior 17, 21–30 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205209
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205209