Abstract
Rats were used in a conditioned-suppression paradigm to determine whether an extinction treatment would enhance a moderately developed conditioned inhibitor (CS−). To dissipate unconditioned suppression to the training stimuli, the subjects were first habituated to the stimuli and then given Pavlovian conditioned-inhibition (CI) training involving reinforced presentations of a clicker and nonreinforced compound presentations of that stimulus and the intended CS−, either a light or a tone. Thereafter, experimental subjects received presentations of their CS− by itself, whereas controls received no further training. Following the occurrence and loss of conditioned suppression to the CS− in the extinction phase, summation and retardation tests showed enhanced CI for the experimental subjects relative to both the controls and their own earlier levels of inhibitory performance. In fact, the enhanced inhibition for the experimental subjects approximated that shown by a comparison group for which the CS− had been strongly developed as an inhibitor. These findings suggest that an excitatory representation is associated with the CS− early in CI training, and that subsequent presentations of the CS− by itself strengthen its inhibitory effect by allowing it to be nonreinforced in the presence of that representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cunningham, C. L. (1981). Association between the elements of a bivalent stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes,7, 425–436.
DeVito, P. L., &Fowler, H. (1986). Effects of contingency violations on the extinction of a conditioned fear inhibitor and a conditioned fear excitor.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes,12, 99–115.
Henderson, R. W. (1978). Forgetting of conditioned fear inhibition.Learning & Motivation,9, 16–30.
Holland, P. C. (1985) The nature of conditioned inhibition in serial and simultaneous feature negative discriminations. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals. Conditioned inhibition (pp. 267–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holland, P. C., &Rescorla, R. A. (1975). Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,88, 459–467.
Kleiman, M. C., &Fowler, H. (1984). Variations in explicitly unpaired training are differentially effective in producing conditioned inhibition.Learning & Motivation,15, 127–155.
Lysle, D. T (1983).Nonassociative extinction of a conditioned inhibitor. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Pittsburgh
Lysle, D. T., &Fowler, H. (1985). Inhibition as a “slave” process: Deactivation of conditioned inhibition through extinction of conditioned excitation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 71–94.
Owren, M. J., & Kaplan, P S. (1981, April).On the failure to extinguish conditioned inhibition: A test of a reinstatement hypothesis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, MI.
Pearce, J. M., Nicholas, D. J., &Dickinson, A. (1982). Loss of associability by a conditioned inhibitorQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33B, 149–162.
Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Second-order conditioning Implications for theories of learning. In F. J. McGuigan & D. B. Lumsden (Eds),Contemporary approaches to conditioning and learning (pp 127–150) Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.
Rescorla, R. A. (1981) Within-signal learning m autoshaping.Animal learning & Behavior,9, 245–252.
Rescorla, R. A. (1982) Some consequences of associations between the excitor and inhibitor in a conditioned inhibition paradigmJournal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes,8, 288–298.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning. Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. H. Prokasy (Eds),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Thomas, D. A. (1979). Retention of conditioned inhibition in a bar press suppression paradigm.Learning & Motivation,10, 161–177.
Wagner, A. R., &Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.),Inhibition and learning (pp 301–336). New York: Academic Press.
Williams, D. A., Travis, G. M., &Overmier, J. B. (1986). Within-compound associations modulate the relative effectiveness of differential and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,12, 351–362.
Witcher, E. S., &Ayres, J. J. B. (1984). A test of two methods for extinguishing Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 149–156.
Zimmer-Hart, C. L., &Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.Journal of Comparative & Physological Psychology,86, 837–845.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was supported in part by a Saint Joseph’s University Faculty Research grant to Paul L. DeVito and by a National Institutes of Health grant (MH24115) and University of Pittsburgh Research Development Award to Harry Fowler.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeVito, P.L., Fowler, H. Enhancement of conditioned inhibition via an extinction treatment. Animal Learning & Behavior 15, 448–454 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205055
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205055