Abstract
This article analyzes computational properties that clarify why the parallel cortical systems V1→V2, V1→MT, and V1→V2→MT exist for the perceptual processing of static visual forms and moving visual forms. The article describes a symmetry principle, called FM symmetry, that is predicted to govern the development of these parallel cortical systems by computing all possible ways of symmetrically gating sustained cells with transient cells and organizing these sustained-transient cells into opponent pairs of on-cells and off-cells whose output signals are insensitive to direction of contrast. This symmetric organization explains how the static form system (static BCS) generates emergent boundary segmentations whose outputs are insensitive to direction of contrast and insensitive to direction of motion, whereas the motion form system (motion BCS) generates emergent boundary segmentations whose outputs are insensitive to direction of contrast but sensitive to direction of motion. FM symmetry clarifies why the geometries of static and motion form perception differ—for example, why the opposite orientation of vertical is horizontal (90°), but the opposite direction of up is down (180°). Opposite orientations and directions are embedded in gated dipole opponent processes that are capable of antagonistic rebound. Negative afterimages, such as the MacKay and waterfall illusions, are hereby explained as are aftereffects of long-range apparent motion. These antagonistic rebounds help to control a dynamic balance between complementary perceptual states of resonance and reset. Resonance cooperatively links features into emergent boundary segmentations via positive feedback in a CC loop, and reset terminates a resonance when the image changes, thereby preventing massive smearing of percepts. These complementary preattentive states of resonance and reset are related to analogous states that govern attentive feature integration, learning, and memory search in adaptive resonance theory. The mechanism used in the V1→MT system to generate a wave of apparent motion between discrete flashes may also be used in other cortical systems to generate spatial shifts of attention. The theory suggests how the V1→V2→MT cortical stream helps to compute moving form in depth and how long-range apparent motion of illusory contours occurs. These results collectively argue against vision theories that espouse independent processing modules. Instead, specialized subsystems interact to overcome computational uncertainties and complementary deficiencies, to cooperatively bind features into context-sensitive resonances, and to realize symmetry principles that are predicted to govern the development of the visual cortex.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albright.T. D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.Journal of Neurophysiology,52, 1106–1130.
Albright.T. D., Desimone, R., &Gross, C. G. (1984). Columnar organization of directionally sensitive cells in visual area MT of the macaque.Journal of Neurophysiology,51, 16–31.
Anderson, S. J., &Burr, D. C. (1987). Receptive field size of human motion detection units.Vision Research,27, 621–635.
Anstis, S., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1987). Visual inertia in apparent motion.Vision Research,27, 755–764.
Badcock, D. R., &Westheimer, G. (l985a). Spatial location and hyper-acuity: The centre/surround localization contribution function has two substrates.Vision Research,25, 1259–1267.
Badcock, D. R., &Westheimer, G. (1985b). Spatial location and hyperacuity: Flank position within the centre and surround zones.Spatial Vision,1, 3–11.
Bartley, S. H. (l941).Vision. a study of its basis. New York: Van Nostrand.
Braddick, O. J. (1974). A short range process in apparent motion.Vision Research,14, 519–527.
Burr, D. C., Ross, J., &Morrone, M. C. (1986). Smooth and sampled motion.Vision Research,26, 643–652.
Carpenter, G. A., &Grossberg, S. (l987a). ART 2: Stable self-organization of pattern recognition for analog input patterns.Applied Optics,26, 4919–4930.
Carpenter, G. A., &Grossberg, S. (1987b). A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing,37, 54–115.
Carpenter, G. A., &Grossberg, S. (1988). The ART of adaptive pattern recognition by a self-organizing neural network.Computer,21, 77–88.
Carpenter, G. A., &Grossberg, S. (1990). ART 3: Hierarchical search using chemical transmitters in self-organizing pattern recognition architectures.Neural Networks,3, 129–152.
Cohen, M. A., &Grossberg, S. (1984). Neural dynamics or brightness perception: Features, boundaries, diffusion, and resonance.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 428–456.
Devawis, R. L., Albrecht, D. G., &Thorell, L. G. (1982). Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex,Vision Research,22, 545–559.
Deyoe, E. A., &Van Essen.D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex.Trends in Neuroscience,11, 219–226.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Eckhorn, R., Bauer, R., Jordan, W., Brosch, M., Kruse, W., Munk, M.,.&Reitboeck, H. J. (1988). Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex?Biological Cybernetics, 60, 121–130.
Eriksen, C. W., &Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 29–305.
Gray, C. M., Konig, P., Engel, A. K., &Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties.Nature,338, 334–337.
Grossberg, S. (1972). A neural theory of punishment and avoidance: II. Quantitative theory.Mathematical Biosciences,15, 253–285.
Grossberg, S. (1973). Contour enhancement, short-term memory, and constancies in reverberating neural networks.Studies in Applied Mathematics,52, 217–257.
Grossberg, S. (1976). Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: II. Feedback, expectation, olfaction, and illusions.Biological Cybernetics,23, 187–202.
Grossberg, S. (1978). A theory of visual coding, memory, and development. In E. Leeuwenberg & H. Buffart (Eds.),Formal theories of visual perception (pp. 7–26). New York: Wiley.
Grossberg, S. (1980). How does a brain build a cognitive code?Psychological Review,87, 1–51.
Grossberg, S. (1982).Studies of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control. Boston: Reidel Press.
Grossberg, S. (Ed.) (l987a).The adaptive brain: II. Vision, speech, language, and motor control. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
Grossberg, S. (l987b). Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: I. Monocular theory.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 87–116.
Grossberg, S. (l987c). Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: II. Binocular theory.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 117–158.
Grossberg, S. (Ed.) (1988).Neural networks and natural intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grossberg, S. (1990).3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grossberg, S., &Marshall, J. (1989). Stereo boundary fusion by cortical complex cells: A system of maps, filters, and feedback networks for multiplexing distributed data.Neural Networks,2, 29–51.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (1985a). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading.Psychological Review,92, 173–211.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (l985b). Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries,and emergent segmentations.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 141–171.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (1986). Computer simulation of neural networks for perceptual psychology.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 601–607.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (1987). Neural dynamics of surface perception: Boundary webs, illuminants, and shape-from-shading.Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing,37, 1l6–165.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (l990a). Neural dynamics of motion segmentation. InProceedings of Graphics Interface/Vision Interface ’90, Halifax, Nova Scotia, May 14–18 (pp. 112–119). Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (l990b). Neural dynamics of motion segmentation: Direction fields, apertures, and resonant grouping. In M. Caudill (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, January,I, 11–14. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (l990c).Neural dynamics of motion segmentation: Direction fields, apertures, and resonant grouping. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., &Todorovic, D. (1989). A neural network architecture for preattentive vision.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering,36, 65–84.
Grossberg, S., &Rudd, M. E. (l989a). A neural architecture for visual motion perception: Group and element apparent motion. In M. Caudill (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, June,I, 195–199. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Grossberg, S., &Rudd, M. E. (l989b). A neural architecture for visual motion perception:Group and element apparent motion.Neural Networks,2, 421–450.
Grossberg, S., &Rudd, M. E. (l989c). Neural dynamics of visual motion perception: Group and element apparent motion.Investigative Ophthalmology Supplement,30, 73.
Grossberg, S., & Rudd, M. E. (l990a).Conical dynamics of visual motion perception: Short-range and long-range motion. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grossberg, S., &Rudd, M. E. (1990b). Cortical dynamics of visual motion perception: Short- and long-range motion.Investigative Ophthalmology Supplement,31, 529.
Grossberg, S., & Somers, D. (1990).Synchronized oscillations during cooperative feature linking in a conical model of visual perception. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grossberg, S., &Todorovic, D. (1988). Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 241–277.
Heggelund, P. (1981). Receptive field organization of simple cells in cat striate cortex.Experimental Brain Research,42, 89–98.
Hogben, J. H., &DiLollo, V. (1985). Suppression of visual persistence in apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 450–460.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex.Journal of Physiology,160, 106–154.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat.Journal of Neurophysiology,28, 229–289.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.Journal of Physiology,195, 215–243.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1977). Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B),198, 1–59.
Kolers, P. A. (1972).Aspects of motion perception. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Laberge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
Mackay, D. M. (1957). Moving visual images produced by regular stationary patterns.Nature,180, 849–850.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
Marshall, J. (1990). Self-organizing neural networks for perception of visual motion.Neural Networksv,3, 45–74.
Maunsell, J. H. R., &Van Essen, D. C. (1983). Response properties of single units in middle temporal visual area of the macaque.Journal of Neurophysiology,49, 1127–1147.
Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1984). Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots.Vision Research,24, 293–299.
Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1985). Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements.Journal of the Optical Society of America,2, 267–273.
Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1986).Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.Nature,320, 264–265.
Newsome, W. T., Gizzi, M. S., &Movshon, J. A. (1983). Spatial and temporal properties of neurons in macaque MT.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,24, 106.
Orban, G. A., Kato, H., &Bishop, P. O. (1979). Dimensions and properties of end-zone inhibitory areas in receptive fields of hypercomplex cells in cat striate cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology,42, 833–849.
Pashler, H. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 191–201.
Peterhans, E., &Von Der Heydt, R. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex, U. Contours bridging gaps.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1749–1763.
Poogio, G. F., Motter, B. C., Squatrito, S., &Trotter, Y. (1985). Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V I and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms.Vision Research,25, 397–406.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1985). Apparent motionof subjective surfaces.Perception,14, 127–134.
Ramachandran, V. S., Rao, V. M., &Vidyasagar, T. R. (1973). Apparent motion with subjective contours.Vision Research,13, 1399–1401.
Redies, C., &Spilimann, L. (1981). The neon color effect in the Ehrenstein illusion.Perception,10, 667–681.
Remington, R., &Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 393–399.
Sekuler, R. (1975). Visual motion perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception: Vol. V. Seeing (pp. 387–430). New York: Academic Press.
Spitzer, H., &Hochstein, S. (1985). A complex-cell receptive field model.Journal of Neurophysiology,53, 1266–1286.
Suiter, A., Beck, J., &Graham, N. (1989). Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 312–332.
Tanaka, M., Lee, B. B., &Creutzfeldt, O. D. (1983). Spectral tuning and contour representation in area 17 of the awake monkey. In J. D. Mollon & L. T. Sharpe (Eds.),Colour vision (pp. 269–276). New York: Academic Press.
Ternus, J. (1926). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über phänomenale Identität.Psychologische Forschung,7, 81–136. [Abstracted and translated in W. D. Ellis (Ed.),A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology. New York: Humanities Press, 1950.]
Thorell, L. G., Devalois, R. L., &Albrecht, D. G. (1984). Spatial mapping of monkey V1 cells with pure color and luminance stimuli.Vision Research,24, 751–769.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Van Allen, E. J., &Kolodzy, P. J. (1987). Application of a boundary contour neural network to illusions and infrared sensor imagery. In M. Caudill & C. Butler (Eds.),Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Neural Networks,IV, 193–197. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
{PaVon Der}Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., &Baumgartner, G. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses.Science,224, 1260–1262.
Von Der Heydt, R., Hänny, P., &Dürsteler, M. R. (1981). The role of orientation disparity in stereoscopic perception and the development of binocular correspondence. In E. Grastyán & P. Molnar (Eds.),Advances in physiological sciences: Vol. 16. Sensory functions. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Von Grünau, M. W. (1986). A motion aftereffect for long-range stroboscopic apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 31–38.
Watt, R. J., &Campbell, F. W. (1985). Vernier acuity: Interactions between length effects and gaps when orientation cues are eliminated.Spatial Vision,1, 31–38.
Zeki, S. M. (l974a). Cells responding to changing image size and disparity in the cortex of the rhesus monkey.Journal of Physiology,242, 827–841.
Zeki, S. M. (1974b). Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey.Journal of Physiology,236, 549–573.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Work supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR 9O-0175), the Army Research Office (ARO DAAL-03-88K-0088), DARPA (AFOSR 90-0(83), and Hughes Research Labs (SI-903136)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grossberg, S. Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form?. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 117–141 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205033
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205033