Abstract
Information was sought on how the strength of fear, acquired and extinguished in a classical conditioning paradigm, might be affected by certain of the circumstances that normally are associated with the course of avoidance learning. Following preconditioning exposures to the conditioned stimulus, one group of rats (Group PRF) was given continuous conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) acquisition trials followed by stepwise reductions in US probability (given the CS) over three phases to about 11% for the final phase. Another group, Group US(lo), was given continuous CS-US pairings throughout, but, following acquisition, received stepwise reductions in US intensity (to permit evaluation of a progressively changing feature of the US over a wide range without having to employ excessive shock) over the same phases. A third group, Group US(hi), received unchanging (from acquisition) CS-US pairings over these phases, and an explicitly unpaired control group (Group RU) was included. Although outcomes differed somewhat depending upon whether suppression ratios or absolute measures of responding were considered, the major findings were that suppression to the CS was complete by the end of acquisition and persisted thereafter throughout the three phases for all but control subjects. In contrast to Group US(lo), which showed relatively little resistance to extinction of suppression to subsequent CS-only exposures, Groups US(hi) and PRF displayed marked resistance over two separate, extended sets of extinction sessions. Suppression to context cues was pronounced only for Groups US(hi) and RU, and varied as a function of US parameters and not whether the shocks were or were not signaled. Theoretical reconciliation of these findings was most difficult for Groun PRF.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Annau, Z., &Kamin, L. J. (1961). The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,54, 428–432.
Badia, P., Coker, C., &Harsh, J. (1973). Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,20, 47–55.
Balsam, P. D., &Tomie, A. (1985).Context and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, J. S. (1961).The motivation of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Callen, E. J., McAllister, W. R., &McAllister, D. E. (1984). Investigations of the reinstatement of extinguished fear.Learning & Motivation,15, 302–320.
Gibbs, C. M., Latham, S. B., &Gormezano, I. (1978). Classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response: Effect of reinforcement schedule on response maintenance and resistance to extinction.Animal Learning & Behavior,6, 209–215.
Hendry, J. S. (1982). Summation of undetected excitation following extinction of the CER.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 476–482.
Hurwitz, H. M. B., &Davis, H. (1983). The description and analysis of conditioned suppression: A critique of the conventional suppression ratio.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 383–390.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kamin, L. J., Brimer, C. J., &Black, A. H. (1963). Conditioned suppression as a monitor of fear to the CS in the course of avoidance training.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,56, 497–501.
Kimble, G. A. (1961).Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Linden, D. R. (1969). Attenuation and reestablishment of the CER by discriminated avoidance conditioning in rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,69, 573–578.
McAllister, W. R., &McAllister, D. E. (1962). Role of the CS and of apparatus cues in measurement of acquired fear.Psychological Reports,11, 749–756.
McAllister, W. R., McAllister, D. E., Weldin, G. H., &Cohen, J. M. (1974) Intertriai interval effects in classically conditioning fear to a discrete conditioned stimulus and to situational cues.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,87, 582–590.
Mineka, S. (1985). The frightful complexity of the origins of fears. In F. R. Brush & J. B. Overmier (Eds.),Affect, conditioning, and cognition: Essays on the determinants of behavior (pp. 55–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mineka, S., Cook, M., &Miller, S. (1984) Fear conditioned with escapable and inescapable shock: The effects of a feedback stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes,10, 307–323.
Mowrer, O. H. (1947). On the dual nature of learning—A reinterpretation of ‘’conditioning’ and ‘problem solving.’Harvard Educational Review,17, 102–148.
Mowrer, O. H. (1960)Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley.
Odling-Smee, F. J. (1975). The role of background stimuli during Pavlovian conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 201–209.
Paré, W., &Livingston, A., Jr. (1973). Shock predictability and gastric secretion in the chronic gastric fistula rat.Physiology & Behavior,11, 521–526.
Reberg, D. (1972). Compound tests for excitation in early acquisition and after prolonged extinction of conditioned suppression.Learning & Motivation,3, 246–258.
Rescorla, R. A., &Solomon, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review,74, 151–182.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Starr, M. D., &Mineka, S. (1977). Determinants of fear over the course of avoidance learning.Learning & Motivation,8, 332–350
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, D.C., Crowell, C.R. & Ramirez, R. Stepwise reductions in US density and intensity: Maintenance and extinction of conditioned suppression. Animal Learning & Behavior 15, 312–320 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205024
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205024