Abstract
The application of the power-spectrum model of masking to the detectability of a signal masked by dichotic noise was investigated in three experiments. In each experiment, the signal was a 2-kHz sinusoid of 400-msec duration, masked by either one or two 800-Hz wide bands of noise presented singly or in pairs. In Experiment 1, we compared the detectability of a diotic signal masked by dichotic noise with the detectability of a monaural signal masked by each of the noises separately. The spectrum level of the noise was 35 dB SPL. For dichotic presentations, the signal was sent to both ears while pairs of noise bands, one below and one above the signal frequency, were presented together, one band to each ear. Threshold levels with the dichotic stimuli were lower than or equal to the thresholds with either ear’s stimulus on its own. Similar dichotic stimuli were used in Experiment 2, except that the signal frequency was nearer to one or the other of the bands of masking noise, and the noise had a spectrum level of 50 dB SPL. In Experiment 3, thresholds were obtained with two sets of symmetrically and asymmetrically placed notched-noise maskers. For one of these sets, the spectrum level of both noise bands was 35 dB SPL; for the other set, interaural intensity differences were introduced in the form of an inequality in the levels of the noise bands on either side of the signal. In one ear, the spectrum level of the lower frequency noise band was 35 dB SPL and the spectrum level of the higher frequency noise band was 25 dB SPL, whereas in the other ear, the allocation ofnoise 1ev-elto.noiseband-was.reversed. The dichotic thresholds obtained with the unequal noise maskers could be predicted from the shapes of the auditory filters derived with equal noise maskers. The data from all three experiments suggest that threshold signal levels in the presence of interaural differences in masker intensity depend principally on the ear with the higher signal-to-masker ratio at the output of its auditory filter, a finding consistent with the power-spectrum model of masking.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barroso, F. (1983). An approach to the study of attentional components in auditory tasks.Journal of Auditory Research,23, 157–180.
Durlach, N. I., &Colburn, H. S. (1978). Binaural phenomena. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception: Vol. IV. Hearing (pp. 365–466). New York: Academic Press.
Egan, J. P., Lindner, W. A., &McFadden, D. (1969). Masking level differences and the form of the psychometric function.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 209–215.
Feddersen, W. E., Sandel, T. T., Teas, D. C., &Jeffress, L. A. (1957). Localization of high-frequency tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,29, 988–991.
Glasberg, B. R., &Moose, B. C. J. (1982). Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,71, 946–949.
Glasberg, B. R., &Moore, B. C. J. (1984). Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,75, 536–544.
Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. J., Patterson, R., &Nimmo-Smith, I. (1984). Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76, 419–427.
Greenwood, D. D. (1961). Auditory masking and the critical band.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,33, 484–502.
Hall, J. W., Haggard, M. P., &Fernandes, M. A. (1984). Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76, 50–56.
Houtgast, T. (1974).Lateral suppression in hearing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Houtgast, T. (1977). Auditory-filter characteristics derived from direct masking data and pulsation-threshold data with a rippled-noise masker.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 409–415.
Lickuder, J. C. R. (1948). Influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,20, 150–159.
Lutfi, R., &Patterson, R. (1984). On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76, 739–745.
McFadden, D. (1975). Masking and the binaural system. In D. B. Tower (Ed.),The nervous system:Hunan communication and its disorders (Vol. 3, pp. 137–146). New York: Raven Press.
Margolis, R. H., &Small, A. M. (1975). The measurement of critical masking bands.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,18, 571–587.
Moore, B. C. J. (1982).An introduction to the psychology of hearing (2nd ed). New York: Academic Press.
Moose, B. C. J., &Glasberg, B. R. (1981). Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,70, 1003–1014.
Moose, B. C. J., &Glasberg, B. R. (1983). Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,74, 750–753.
Patterson, R. D. (1974). Auditory filter shape.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,56, 802–809.
Patterson, R. D. (1976). Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,59, 640–654.
Patterson, R. D., &Henning, B. D. (1977). Stimulus variability and auditory filter shape.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 649–664.
Patterson, R. D., &Nimmo-Smith, I. (1980). Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,67, 229–245.
Patterson, R. D., Nimmo-Smith, I., Weber, D., &Milroy, R. (1982). The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,72, 1788–1803.
Pick, G. F. (1980). Level dependence of psychophysical frequency resolution and auditory filter shape.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,68, 1085–1095.
Schooneveldt, G. P., &Moore, B. C. J. (1987). Comodulation masking release (CMR): Effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,82, 1944–1956.
Taylor, M. M., &Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,41, 782–787.
Tyler, R., Hall, J., Glasberg, B., Moore, B., &Patterson, R. (1984). Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76, 1363–1368.
Weber, D. L. (1977), Growth of masking and the auditory filter.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 424–429.
Weston, P. B., &Miller, J. D. (1965). Use of noise to eliminate one ear from masking experiments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,37, 638–646.
Yost, W. A. (1982). The dominance region and ripple noise pitch: A test of the peripheral weighting model.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,72, 416–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Experiment 3 was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Auckland University Research Committee. This article was significantly improved over an earlier version through the constructive comments of an anonymous reviewer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stillman, J.A., Irwin, R.J. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels. Perception & Psychophysics 47, 281–290 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205002
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205002