Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article
Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

The implied motion aftereffect changes decisions, but not confidence

24 August 2021

Regan M. Gallagher, Thomas Suddendorf & Derek H. Arnold

Searching for illusory motion

22 May 2019

Ian M. Thornton & Sunčica Zdravković

Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception

26 March 2018

Mauro Manassi, Alina Liberman, … David Whitney

Self-reference modulates the perception of visual apparent motion

28 November 2022

Jianrui Huang, Lihan Chen & Xiaolin Zhou

The role of object history in establishing object correspondence

26 November 2019

Madeleine Y. Stepper, Cathleen M. Moore, … Elisabeth Hein

Temporal integration in the perception and discrimination of solid shape

03 April 2020

J. Farley Norman, Jessica M. Dukes, … Sarah N. Elder

Differential cortical activation during the perception of moving objects along different trajectories

08 August 2019

Finnegan J. Calabro, Scott A. Beardsley & Lucia M. Vaina

Integration of Position and Predictive Motion Signals in Aging Vision

29 May 2020

Hyun-Jun Jeon, Yeojeong Yun & Oh-Sang Kwon

Comparisons of flashILM, transformational apparent motion, and polarized gamma motion indicate these are three independent and separable illusions

28 November 2018

HyunYoung Ha & Jeff P. Hamm

Download PDF
  • Published: July 1989

Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature

  • Michael K. McBeath1 &
  • Roger N. Shepard1 

Perception & Psychophysics volume 46, pages 333–337 (1989)Cite this article

  • 407 Accesses

  • 36 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

When a shape is alternately presented in two positions differing in both location and orientation, apparent motion tends to be experienced over a curved path. The curvature provides evidence about principles of object motion that may have been internalized in the perceptual system. This study introduces a technique for estimating deviation from a straight path. A shape was alternately presented on the two sides of a visual partition with a “window” just wide enough to accommodate the shape. Observers adjusted the location of the window to maximize the illusion of smooth passage of the shape through the window. In accordance with theoretical expectations, estimated deviations from rectilinear motion increased with the separation between the stimuli in spatial location, angular orientation, and time.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Anstis, S., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1986). Entrained path deflection in apparent motion.Vision Research,26, 1731–1739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anstis, S., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1987). Visual inertia in apparent motion.Vision Research,27, 755–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Attneave, F., &Block, G. (1973). Apparent motion in tridimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. F., &Voth, A. C. (1937). The path of seen movement as a function of the vector-field.American Journal of Psychology,49, 543–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesen, C., Larsen, A., &Farrell, J. E. (1983). Visual apparent movement: Transformations of size and orientation.Perception,12, 549–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, P., &Sperling, G. (1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.Psychological Review,82, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, E. H., & Shepard, R. N. (1989a).Psychologically simple motionsas geodesic paths: 1. Asymmetric objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Carlton, E. H., & Shepard, R. N. (1989b).Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths: 2. Symmetric objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Corbin, H. H. (1942). The perception of grouping and apparent movement in visual depth.Archives of Psychology,273, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. E. (1983). Visual transformations underlying apparent movement.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. E., Larsen, A., &Bundesen, C. (1982). Velocity constraints on apparent rotational movement.Perception,11, 541–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. E., &Shepard, R. N. (1981). Shape, orientation, and apparent rotational motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. H. (1975). Visual apparent motion and some preferred paths in the rotation group SO(3).Biological Cybernetics,18, 81–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. von. (1962).Treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1857)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. A. (1963). Some differences between real and apparent visual movement.Vision Research,3, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. A., &Green, M. (1984). Color logic of apparent motion.Perception,13, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. A., &Pomerantz, J. R. (1971). Figural change in apparent motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, A. (1915). Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,72, 194–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, M. K. (1989).The effect of object shopeon the path of apparent motion. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Mori, T. (1982). Apparent motion path composed of a serial concatenation of translations and rotations.Biological Cybernetics,44, 31–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, W. (1930). Experimentelle Untersuchung der Scheinbewegung.Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie,75, 315–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R., Gilden, D. L., Kaiser, M. K., &Whelan, S. W. (1988). The effect of configural orientation on perceived trajectory in apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C., &Shepard, R. N. (1977). Spatio-temporal probing of apparent rotational movement.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychophysical complementarity. In M. Kubovy & J. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 279–341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming.Psychological Review,194, 417–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1989). Internal representation of universal regularities: A challenge for connectionism. In L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover, & R. M. Harnish (Eds.),Neural connections, mental computation (pp. 104–134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Judd, S. A. (1976). Perceptual illusion of rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,191, 952–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Zare, S. L. (1983). Path-guided apparent motion.Science,220, 632–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, T. (1961).Classics in psychology. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,61, 161–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Building 420, 94305-2130, Stanford, CA

    Michael K. McBeath & Roger N. Shepard

Authors
  1. Michael K. McBeath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger N. Shepard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by NSF Research Grant BNS 85-11685 to the second author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McBeath, M.K., Shepard, R.N. Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature. Perception & Psychophysics 46, 333–337 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204986

Download citation

  • Received: 24 October 1988

  • Accepted: 23 March 1989

  • Issue Date: July 1989

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204986

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Apparent Motion
  • Confidence Rating
  • Angular Difference
  • Straight Path
  • Circular Path
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 185.186.9.21

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.