Abstract
Cutting and Rosner (Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 564–570) reported that sawtooth wavetrains were perceived categorically when an array was varied in linear rise time increments. That is, rapid rise time stimuli were identified as plucked strings and slower rise time stimuli as bowed strings, and pluck-bow comparisons were relatively easy to discriminate but pluck-pluck and bow-bow comparisons were not. Such results indicate the general equivalence of identification and discrimination tasks. Rosen and Howell (Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 156–168), however, report that categorical perception does not occur for these sounds for two reasons. First, the original stimuli did not have the rise times reported by Cutting and Rosner. Second, the perception of these stimuli more closely follows a prediction from a Weber fraction. Acknowledging the first fact to be true, in part due to difficulties in digital-to-analog conversion, I set out to replicate and extend the results of Rosen and Howell. In Experiment 1, I found that stimuli with equal linear increments of rise time are not perceived categorically; but they are not perceived to follow closely a logarithmic relation either. In Experiment 2, I found that stimuli with equal logarithmic increments of rise time were generally perceived categorically. Experiment 3 replicated the results of both experiments. Thus, plucked and bowed music-like sounds can sometimes be found to be perceived in a categorical manner. However, categorical perception is not found with stimuli generated in the manner of Cutting and Rosner (1974) or Rosen and Howell (1981), and the phenomenon generally seems subject to rather stringent, if not curious, stimulus conditions. Moreover, and more deeply, categorical perception seems hardly the bedrock phenomenon it once appeared to be, whether in speech or in any other domain.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Macmillan, N. A.Categorical perception of musical sounds: The psychophysics of plucks and bows. Paper presented at the 20th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Phoenix, November, 1979. (Abstract reprinted inBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979,11, 241 .)
Macmillan, N. A. Personal communication, November 18, 1980.
Blechner, M. J.Right-ear advantage for musical stimuli differing in rise time (Status Report on Speech Research SR-47). New Haven, Corm: Haskins Laboratories, 1976.
Sachs, R. M., & Grant, K. W.Stimulus correlates in theperception of voice onset time (VOT): II. Discrimination of speech with high and low uncertainty. Paper presented at the 92nd meeting of the Acoustical Society of American, San Diego, November 1976. (Abstract reprinted inJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60, S91.)
Nye, P. W. Letter to Burton S. Rosner, February 27, 1981.
References
Barclay, J. R. Noncategorical perception of a voiced stop: A replication.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 269–273.
Bever, T. G., &Chiarello, S. J. Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians.Science, 1974,195, 537–539.
Blakemore, C., &Campbell, F. W. On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.Journal of Physiology, 1969,203, 237–260.
Blechner, M. J., Day, R. S., &Cutting, J. E. Processing two dimensions of nonspeech stimuli: The auditory-phonetic distinction reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 257–266.
Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., &Viemeister, N. F. Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT.Journal of the Acoustical Society of A merica, 1977,62, 961–970.
Creelman, C. D., &Macmillan, N. A. Auditory phase and frequency discrimination: A comparison of nine procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 146–156.
Cutting, J. E. There may be nothing peculiar to perceiving in the speech mode. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hilisdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Categories and boundaries in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 564–570.
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Discrimination functions predicted from categories in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 87–88.
Cutting, J. E., Rosner, B. S., &Foard, C. F. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,28, 361–378.
Halperin, Y., Nachshon, I., &Carmon, A. Shift in ear superiority in dichotic listening to temporal pattern nonverbal stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973,53, 46–50.
Hays, W. L.Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
Jusczyk, P. W., Rosner, B. S., Cutting, J. E., Foard, C. F., &Smith, L. B. Categorical perception of nonspeech sounds by 2-month-old infants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 50–54.
Kaplan, H. L., Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. Tables of d’ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1978,10, 796–813.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., &Griffith, B. C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 358–368.
Liberman, A. M., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Phonetic perception. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 8). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
Locke, S., &Kellar, L. Categorical perception in a nonlinguistic mode.Cortex, 1973,9, 355–369.
Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., &Creelman, C. D. The psychophysics of categorical perception.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 452–471.
Miller, J. D., Wier, C. C., Pastore, R. E., Kelly, W. J., &Dooling, R. J. Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60, 410–417.
Parducci, A., &Perreatt, L. Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency of stimulus values.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 1971,89, 427–452.
Pastore, R. E. Categorical perception: A critical re-evaluation. In S. K. Hirsh, D. H. Eldredge, I. J. Hirsch, & S. R. Silverman (Eds.),Hearing and Davis. St. Louis: Washington University Press, 1976.
Pastore, R. E., &Scheirer, C. J. Signal detection theory: Considerations for general application.Psychological Bulletin, 1974,81, 945–958.
Pisoni, D. B. Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 7–18.
Pisoni, D. B. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset of two component tones: Implications for voicing performance in stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 1352–1361.
Pisosi, D. B., &Lazarus, J. H. Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,55, 328–333.
Pollack, I., &Pisoni, D. B. On the comparison between identification and discrimination tests in speech perception.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 299–300.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Sager, L. C. Asymmetric integrality with dimensions of visual patterns.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 460–466.
Remez, R. E. An hypothesis of event-sensitivity in the perception of speech and bass violins (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1978).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978,39, 5618-B. (University Microfilms No. 7911404)
Remez, R. E., Studdert-Kennedy, M., &Cutting, J. E. Crossseries adaptation using song and string.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 524–530.
Rosen, S. M., &Howell, P. Plucks and bows are not categorically perceived.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 156–168.
Schouten, M. E. H. The case against a speech mode of perception.ActaPsychologica, 1980,44, 71–98.
Siegel, J. A., &Siegel, W. Categorical perception of tonal intervals: Musicians can’t tell sharp from flat.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 399–407.
Stevens, K. N. Constraints imposed by the auditory system on properties used to classify speech sounds: Data from phonology, acoustics, and psychoacoustics. In T. F. Myers, J. Laver, & J. Anderson (Eds.),The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North-Holland, in press.
Van Heuven, V. J. J. P., &Van Den Broecke, J. P. R. Auditory discrimination of rise and decay time in tone and noise bursts.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979,66, 1308–1315.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Wood, C. C. Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: Neurophysiological and information-processing analyses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1975,1, 3–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by NIH Grant MH35530.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cutting, J.E. Plucks and bows are categorically perceived, sometimes. Perception & Psychophysics 31, 462–476 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204856
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204856