Abstract
The difficulties inherent in the evaluation of educational software are described in terms of the tradeoffs between internal, external, and ecological validity. Larger issues in evaluation research design and computer-based instruction are highlighted by primary and metaanalytic studies designed to reveal the effects of computer simulations in psychology classrooms and laboratories. The effectiveness of classroom and laboratory computer activities depends on how the inclusion of software, as well as the evaluation process itself, changes the entire instructional process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banaji, M., &Crowder, R. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory.American Psychologist,44, 1185–1193.
Belmore, S. M. (1983). RELEASE FROM PI: Comparison of traditional and computer modules in an experimental psychology laboratory.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,15, 191–194.
Borich, G., &Jemelka, R. (1981). Evaluation. InComputer-based instruction: A state-of-the-art assessment (pp. 161–209). New York: Academic Press.
Castellan, N.J., Jr. (1986). Issues in the effective use of computers in introductory and advanced courses in psychology.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 251–256.
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research,53, 445–459.
Glass, G., McGaw, B., &Smith, M. (1981).Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hagler, P., &Knowlton, J. (1987). Invalid implicit assumption in CBI comparison research.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,14, 84–88.
Jamison, D., Suppes, P., &Welles, S. (1974). The effectiveness of alternative instructional media: A survey.Review of Educational Research,44, 1–68.
Joucoeur, K., &Berger, D. E. (1986). Do we really know what makes educational software effective? A call for empirical research on effectiveness.Educational Technology,26, 7–11.
Kulik, C. L., &Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer based instruction: An updated analysis.Computers in Human Behavior,7, 75–94.
Kuuk, C. L., Kuuk, J. A., &Cohen, P. (1980). Effectiveness of computer based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings.Review of Educational Research,50, 525–544.
Kulik, J. A., &Kulik, C. L. (1987). Review of recent research literature on computer based instruction.Contemporary Educational Psychology,12, 222–230.
Niemiec, R., &Walberg, H. (1987). Comparative effects of computer-based instruction: A synthesis of reviews.Journal of Educational Computing Research,3, 19–37.
Saloman, G., &Clark, R. (1977). Reexamining the methodology of research on media and technology in education.Review of Educational Research,47, 99–120.
Welsh, J. A., &Null, C H. (1991). The effects of computer-based instruction on college students’ comprehension of classic research.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,23, 301–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ransdell, S. Educational software evaluation research: Balancing internal, external, and ecological validity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25, 228–232 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204502
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204502