Abstract
In many psychoacoustic experiments, an experimenter wishes to determine the effects of one or more treatments Ito the subjects, or to the stimuli, or to both) with as little experimental labor as possible. The experimenter is often able to control the similarity of the stimuli and is thus free to choose a base level of performance before the treatment is applied. On the basis of the model presented in this paper, the base level of performance that best enables any change in performance due to the treatment to be detected is predicted. A relatively high base-level performance of 95% correct discrimination results from the model, although practical constraints may dictate a somewhat lower value. An experiment (involving pitch discrimination) that provides data supporting the model is also reported. The model is applicable only to the two-alternative/forced-choice experimental paradigm.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. C. A variable sensitivity theory of signal detection.Psychological Review, 1963,70, 91–106.
Bush, R. R. Estimation and evaluation. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley, 1963.
Hays, W. L.Statistics. London: Holt, 1969.
Konig, E. Effect of time on pitch discrimination thresholds under several psychophysical procedures: Comparison with intensity discrimination threshold.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1957,29, 606–612.
Thornton, A. R., &Raffin, M. J. M. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1978,21, 507–518.
Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The work outlined in this paper was performed while the author was at the University of New South Wales, Australia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dillon, H. An optimum value for detection probability. Perception & Psychophysics 30, 169–174 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204475
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204475