Abstract
Two experiments provide convergent evidence for the hypothesis that listeners interpret chords in terms of their harmonic functions in a system of interrelated keys. The perceived associations between chords undergo significant changes depending on the broader tonal framework in which they are embedded. Three independent context effects are identified, and their magnitude is found to be a systematic function of the distance between the context key and the key lot keys) of which the chords are members. In the first experiment, listeners rate how musically related one chord is to a second chord; the chords are those that function within two maximally distant major keys (C major and F# major). All possible chord pairs from this set are presented in each of three context keys: G major which is close to C major and distant from F# major), A major (which is moderately distant from both C major and F# major), and B major (which is close to F# major and distant from C major). The second experiment measures recognition memory for the same chords embedded in tonal sequences in C, G, A, or B major keys, or random sequences. In the two experiments, the distance between the context key and the key of the chords on the circle-of-fifths affects: (1) the probability that a repeated chord is correctly recognized, (2) the strength of association between chords from the same key measured in terms of both confusion errors and direct relatedness judgments, and (3) asymmetries in confusion errors and relatedness judgments when the chords are in different keys. Perceived harmonic relations are thus found to be strongly context dependent, but the context effects are lawful functions of interkey distance. We conclude that listeners possess a highly articulated system of knowledge about the harmonic functions of chords in musical keys and an appreciation of musical structure at the level of abstract tonal centers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Dowling, W. J. & Bartlett, J. C.Assimilation of brief atonal melodies to tonal prototypes: Asymmetrical effects on judgment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, November 1981.
Kruskal, J. B.How to use MDSCAL, a program to do multidimensional scaling and multidimensional unfolding (Version 4). Murray Hill, N.J: Bell Laboratories, 1968.
References
Bartlett, J. C., &Dowling, W. J. Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 501–515.
Bharucha, J. & Krumhansl, C. L. The representation of harmonic structure in music: Hierarchies of stability as a function of context.Cognition, in press.
Cuddy, L. L., Cohen, A. J., &Miller, J. Melody recognition: The experimental application of musical rules.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1979,33, 148–157.
Dewar, K. M, Cuddy, L. L., &Mewhort, D. J. K. Recognition memory for single tones with and without context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: uman Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 60–67.
Dowling, W. J. Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 341–354.
Francès, R.La perception de la musique (2nd ed.). Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1972.
Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 241–254.
Krumhansl, C. L. Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 445–463.
Krumhansl, C. L. The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 346–374.
Krumhansl, C. L, Bharucha, J., &Kessler, E. J. Perceived harmonic structure of chords in three related musical keys.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982,8, 24–36.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Keil, F. C. Acquisition of the hierarchy of tonal functions in music.Memory and Cognition, 1982,10, 243–251.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Kessler, E. J. Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys.Psychological Review, 1982,89, 334–368.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Shepard, R. N. Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 579–594.
Kruskal, J. B. Nometric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 28–42.
Piston, W.Harmony (3rd ed.). New York: Norton, 1962.
Rosch, E. Cognitive reference points.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 532–547.
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I & II.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–140, 219–246.
Shepard, R. N. Circularity in judgments of relative pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964,36, 2346–2353.
Shepard, R. N. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 373–421.
Tversky, A. Features of similarity.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 327–352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant to the first author from the National Science Foundation (BNS 081-03570).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krumhansl, C.L., Bharucha, J. & Castellano, M.A. Key distance effects on perceived harmonic structure in music. Perception & Psychophysics 32, 96–108 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204269
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204269