There are three senses in which a visual stimulus may be said to persist psychologically for some time after its physical offset. First, neural activity in the visual system evoked by the stimulus may continue after stimulus offset (“neural persistence”). Second, the stimulus may continue to be visible for some time after its offset (“visible persistence”). Finally, information about visual properties of the stimulus may continue to be available to an observer for some time after stimulus offset (“informational persistence”). These three forms of visual persistence are widely assumed to reflect a single underlying process: a decaying visual trace that (1) consists of afteractivity in the visual system, (2) is visible, and (3) is the source of visual information in experiments on decaying visual memory. It is argued here that this assumption is incorrect. Studies of visible persistence are reviewed; seven different techniques that have been used for investigating visible persistence are identified, and it is pointed out that numerous studies using a variety of techniques have demonstrated two fundamental properties of visible persistence: theinverse duration effect (the longer a stimulus lasts, the shorter is its persistence after stimulus offset) and theinverse intensity effect (the more intense the stimulus, the briefer its persistence). Only when stimuli are so intense as to produce afterimages do these two effects fail to occur. Work on neural persistences is briefly reviewed; such persistences exist at the photoreceptor level and at various stages in the visual pathways. It is proposed that visible persistence depends upon both of these types of neural persistence; furthermore, there must be an additional neural locus, since a purely stereoscopic (and hence cortical) form of visible persistence exists. It is argued that informational persistence is defined by the use of the partial report methods introduced by Averbach and Coriell (1961) and Sperling (1960), and the term “iconic memory” is used to describe this form of persistence. Several studies of the effects of stimulus duration and stimulus intensity upon the duration of iconic memory have been carried out. Their results demonstrate that the duration of iconic memory is not inversely related to stimulus duration or stimulus intensity. It follows that informational persistence or iconic memory cannot be identified with visible persistence, since they have fundamentally different properties. One implication of this claim that one cannot investigate iconic memory by tasks that require the subject to make phenomenological judgments about the duration of a visual display. In other words, the so-called “direct methods” for studying iconic memory do not provide information about iconic memory. Another implication is that iconic memory is not intimately tied to processes going on in the visual system (as visible persistence is); provided a stimulus is adequately legible, its physical parameters have little influence upon its iconic memory. The paper concludes by pointing out that there exists an alternative to the usual view of iconic memory as a precategorical sensory buffer. According to this alternative, iconic memory is post-categorical, occurring subsequent to stimulus identification. Here, stimulus identification is considered to be a rapid automatic process which does not require buffer storage, but which provides no information about episodic properties of a visual stimulus. Information about these physical stimulus properties must, in some way, be temporarily attached to a representation of the stimulus in semantic memory; and it is this temporarily attached physical information which constitutes iconic memory.
Mollon, 1.Two approaches to the perceptual moment hypothesis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, Oxford, England, 1969.
Fox, R., Lehmkuhle, S., & Shea, S.iconic memory in stereoscopic space: Seeing without storing. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Psychonomic Society meeting, SI. Louis, Mo., 1977.
Adelson, E. H., & 1onides, 1.The psychophysics of iconic storage. Paper presented at the Psychonornic Society meeting S1. Louis, 1978.
Allport, D. A.Word recognition and reading. Paper presented at the meeting on Processing of Visible Language, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1977.
Allport, D. A.Word recognition and the recognition buffer. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, London, 1973.
Marcel, A. 1.Perception with and without awareness. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society. Stirling, Scm land. 1974.
Adelson, E. H. Iconic storage: The role of rods.Science, 1978,201, 544–546.
Aguilar, M., &Stiles, W. S. Saturation of the rod mechanism of the retina at high levels of stimulation.Optica Acta, 1954,1, 59–65.
Allport, D. A.Studies in the psychological unit of duration. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1966.
Allport, D. A. Temporal summation and phenomenal simultaneity: Experiments with the radius display.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,22, 686–701.
Allport, D. A. On knowing the meanings of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1977.
Alpern, M., &Barh, L. Durations of the afterimages of brief light flashes and the theory of the Broca and Sulzer phenomenon.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1962,52, 219–221.
Andreewsky, E., Deloche, G., & Kossanyi, P. Analogies between speed reading and deep dyslexia (Towards a procedural understanding of reading). In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, in press.
Anstis, S. M., &Atkinson, J. Distortions in moving figures viewed through a stationary slit.American Journal of Psychology, 1967,80, 572–585.
Arnett, J. L., & Di Lollo, V. Visual information processing in relation to age and reading ability.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, in press.
Averbach, E., &Coriell, A. S. Short-term memory in vision.Bell Systems Technical Journal, 1961,40, 309–328.
Averbach, E., &Sperling, G. Short-term storage of information in vision. In C. Cherry (Ed.),Information theory. London: Butterworth, 1961.
Banks, W. P., &Bahber, G. Color information in iconic memory.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 536–546.
Bartlett, N. R., Sticht, T. G., &PZease, V. P. Effects of wavelength and retinal locus on the reaction time to onset and offset stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,78, 699–701.
Bowen, R. W., Pola, J., &Matin, L. Visual persistence: Effects of flash luminance, duration and energy.Vision Research, 1974,14, 295–303.
Breitmeyer, B. Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels.Vision Research, 1975,15, 1411–1412.
Bheitmeyer, B., &Ganz, L. Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channels.Vision Research, 1977,17, 861–865.
Breitmeyer, B., &Julesz, B. The role of on and off transients in determining the psychophysical spatial frequency response.Vision Research, 1975,15, 411–415.
Briggs, G. G., &Kinsbourne, M. Visual persistence as measured by reaction time.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,24, 318–325.
Carpenter, P. A., &Ganz, L. An attentional mechanism in the analysis of spatial frequency.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 57–60.
Clark, S. E. Retrieval of color information from preperceptual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 263–266.
Cleland, B. G., Levick, W. R., &Sanderson, K. J. Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina.Journal of Physiology, 1973,228, 649–680.
Cohen, G., &Martin, M. Hemisphere differences in an auditory Stroop task.Percpetion & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 79–83.
Cohene, L. S. Iconic memory of dot patterns: Preliminary report.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975,41, 167–170.
Coltheart, M. Visual information-processing. In P. C. Dodwell, (Ed.),New horizons in psychology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1972.
Coltiieart, M. Coiour-specificitv and monocularuv in the visual cortex.Vision Research, 1973,13, 2595–2598.
Coltiieart, M. Iconic memory: A reply to Professor Holding.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 42–48. (a)
Coltiieart, M. Doubts about iconic memory: A reply to Holding.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 511–512. (b)
Coltheart, M. Contemporary models of the cognitive processes. 1: Information input and storage. In V Hamilton & M. D. Vernon (Eds.),The development of cognitive processes. London: Academic Press, 1977.
Coltheart, M. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.).Strategies of information-processing, London: Academic Press, 1978. (a)
Coltheart, M. The internal lexicon and its access during reading. In J. P. Sutcliffe (Ed.),Conceptual analysis and method in psvchology. Sydney: University Press, 1978. (b)
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E..Jonasson, J. T., &Hesner, D. Access 10 the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. New York: Erlhaum, 1977.
Coltiieart, M., Lea, C. D.. &Thompson, K. In defence of iconic memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,26, 633–641
Cumming, G. D.Visual perception and metacontrast at rapia input rates. Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1972.
Demkiw, P., &Miciiaels, C. Motion information in iconic memory.Acta Psychologica, 1976,40, 257–274.
Dick, A. O. Relations between the sensory register and short-term storage in tachistoscopic recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 279–284.
Dick, A. O. Visual processing and the use of redundant information in tachistoscopic recognition.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1970,24, 133–141.
Di Lollo, V. Temporal characteristics of iconic memory.Nature, 1977,267, 241–243.
Di Lollo, V. On the spatio-temporal interactions of brief visual displays. In R. H. Day & G. V. Stanley (Eds.),Studies in perception. Perth: University of Western Australia Press, 1978
Di Lollo, V. Temporal integration in visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, in press.
Di Lollo, V., &Wilson, A. E. Iconic persistence and perceptual moment as determinants of temporal integration in vision.Vision Research, 1978,18, 1607–1610.
Dixon, N. F., &Hammond, J. The attenuation of visual persistence.British Journal of Psychology, 1972,63, 243–254.
Efhon, R. Stereoscopic vision—I: Effect of binocular summation.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1957,41, 709–730.
Efron, R. The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception.Neuropsychologia, 1970,8, 37–55. (a).
Efron, R. The minimum duration of a perception.Neuropsychologia, 1970,8, 57–63. (b)
Efhon, R. Effect of stimulus duration on perceptual onset and offset latencies.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 231–234. (c)
Efron, R. An invariant characteristic of perceptual systems in the time domain. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance I V. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Efhon, R., &Lee, D.N. The visual persistence of a moving stroboscopically illuminated object.American Journal of Psychology, 1971,84, 365–375.
Engel, G. R. An investigation of visual responses to brief stereoscopic stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,22, 148–160.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 143–149,
Eriksen, C. W., &Collins, J. F. Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 476–484.
Eriksen, C. W., &Collins, J. F. Sensory traces versus the psychological moment in the temporal organization of form.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 376–382.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. Visual masking in multi-element displays.Journal of Experimental Psvchology, 1970,83, 147–154.
Fain, G. L., &Dowling, J. E. Intracellular recordings from single rods and cones in the mudpuppy retina.Science, 1973,180, 1178–1181.
Fehrer, E., &Raab, D. Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 143–147.
Gelijard, F.The human senses. New York: Wiley, 1953.
Haber, R. N., &Nathanson, L. S. Post-retinal storage? Some further observations on Parks’ camel as seen through the eye of a needle.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968,3, 349–355.
Haber, R. N., &Standing, L. Direct measures of short-term visual storage.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,21, 43–54.
Haber, R. N., &Standing, L. Direct estimates of the apparent duration of a flash.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1970,24, 216–229.
Hogben, J. H., &Di Lollo, V. Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli.Vision Research, 1974,14, 1059–1069.
Holding, D. H. Guessing behavior and the Sperling store.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,22, 248–256.
Holding, D. H. Brief visual memory for English and Arabic letters.Psychonomic Science, 1972,28, 241–242.
Holding, D. H. Recognition tests of visual information storage.British Journal of Psychology, 1973,64, 9–16.
Holding, D. H. Doubts about iconic memory: A reply to Coltheart, Lea and Thompson.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 507–509. (a)
Holding, D. H. Sensory storage revisited.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 31–41. (b)
Hunter, W. S., &Sigler, M. The span of visual discrimination as a function of time and intensity of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940,26, 160–179.
Julesz, B.Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
Julesz, B., &Chiarucci, E. Short-term memory for stroboscopic movement perception.Perception, 1973,2, 249–260.
Kahneman, D., &Norman, J. The time-intensity relation in visual perception as a function of observer’s task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 215–220.
Keele, S. W., &Chase, W. G. Short-term visual storage.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 383–386.
Kulikowski, J. J. Human averaged occipital potentials evoked by pattern and movement.Journal of Physiology, 1974,242, 70–71.
Kulikowski, J. J. Visual evoked potentials as a measure of visibility. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.),Visual evoked potentials in man: New developments. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
Kulikowski, J. J., &Tolhurst, D. J. Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient channels in human vision.Journal of Physiology, 1973,232, 149–163.
Legrand, Y.Light, colour and vision. London: Chapman and Hall, 1957.
Levine, D. N., &Calvanio, R. A study of the visual defect in verbal alexia-sirnultanagnosia.Brain, 1978,101, 65–81.
Lowe, D. G. Temporal aspects of selective masking.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 375–385.
Mackworth, J. The duration of the visual image.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963,17, 62–81.
Makous, W., &Boothe, R. Cones block signals from rods.Vision Research, 1974,14, 285–294.
Mavzner, M. S., &Tresselt, M. E. Visual information processing with sequential inputs: A general model for sequential blanking, displacement, and overprinting phenomenaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1970,169, 599–618.
Meyer, G. E. The effects of color-specific adaptation on the perceived duration of gratings.Vision Research, 1977,17, 51–56.
Meyer, G. E., Lawson, R. L., &Cohen, W. The effects of orientation-specific adaptation on the duration of short-term visual storage.Vision Research, 1975,15, 569–572.
Meyer, G. E., &Maguire, W. M. Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage.Science, 1977,198, 524–525.
Mollon, J., &Polden.P. On the time constants of tachisto-scopes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 555–568.
Morton, J. Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 165–178.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Norman, R. A., &Werblin, F. S. Control of retinal sensitivity: I. Light and dark adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones.Journal of General Physiology, 1974,63, 37–61.
Ogle, K. N. Stereoscopic depth perception and exposure delays between images in the two eyes.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1963,53, 1296–1304.
Parker, D. M., &Salzen, E. A. Latency changes in the human visual evoked response to sinusoidal gratings.Vision Research, 1977,17, 1201–1204.
Parks, T. E. Post-retinal visual storage.American Journal of Psychology, 1965,78, 145–147.
Pease, V. P., &Sticht, T. G. Reaction time as a function of onset and offset stimulation of the fovea and periphery.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965,20, 549–554.
Penn, R. D., &Hagins, W. A. Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods.Biophysics, 1972,12, 1073–1094.
Phillips, W. A., &Singer, W. Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision. I: Psychophysics.Experimental Brain Research, 1974,19, 493–506.
Pollack.I. Visual discrimination of “unseen” objects: Forced-choice testing of Mayzner-Tresselt sequential blanking effects.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 121–128.
Pollack, I. Interaction effects in successive visual displays: An extension of the Eriksen-Collins paradigm.Perception & P5ychophysics, 1973,13, 367–373.
Rains, J. D. Reaction time to onset and cessation of a visual stimulus.Psychological Record, 1961,11, 265–268.
Ross, J., &Hogben, J. H. Short-term memory in stereopsis,Vision Research, 1974,14, 1195–1201.
Russell, R. J. H.Temporal coding in iconic memory. Unpublished D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1977.
Sakitt, B. Locus of short-term visual storage.Science, 1975,190, 1318–1319.
Sakitt, B. Iconic memory.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 257–276. (a)
Sakitt, B. Psychophysical correlates of photoreceptor activity.Vision Research, 1976,16, 129–140. (b)
Sakitt, B., &Appelman, J. B. The effects of memory load and the contrast of the rod signal on partial report superiority in a Sperling task.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 562–567.
Sakitt, B., &Long, G. M. Relative rod and cone contributions to iconic storage.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 527–536.
Sakitt, B., &Long, G. M. Spare the rod and spoil the icon.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 19–30.
Scharf, B., &Lefton, L. A. Backward and forward masking as a function of stimulus and task parameters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 331–338.
Serviere, J., Miceli, D., &Galifret, Y. A psychophysical study of the visual perception of “instantaneous” and “durable.”Vision Research, 1977,17, 57–63. (a)
Serviere, J., Miceli, D., &Galifret, Y. Electrophysiological correlates of the visual perception of “instantaneous” and “durable.”Vision Research, 1977,17, 65–69. (b)
Shallice, T. The detection of change and the perceptual moment hypothesis.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964,17, 113–135.
Shallice, T., &Warrington, E. K. The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia.Neuropsychologia, 1977,15, 31–41.
Singer, W. Temporal aspects of subcortical contrast processing.Neurosciences Research Programme Bulletin, 1977,15, 358–369.
Singer, W., &Phillips, W. A. Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision. II. Neurophysiology.Experimental Brain Research, 1974,19, 507–521.
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs, 1960,74, 1–29.
Sperling, G. Successive approximations to a model for short-term memory.Acta Psychologia, 1967,27, 285–292.
Stabell, D., &Stabell, B. Absence of rod activity from peripheral vision.Vision Research, 1976,16, 1433–1437.
Stanley, G. Visual information processing and specific reading disability (dyslexia). In R. H. Day & G. Stanley (Eds.),Studies in perception. Perth: University of Western Australia Press, 1978.
Stanley, G., &Hall, R. Short-term visual information processing in dyslexics.Child Development, 1973,44, 341–344.
Stanley, G., &Molloy, M. Retinal painting and visual information storage.Acca Psychologica, 1975,39, 283–288.
Steinberg, R. H. The rod after-effect in S-potentials from the cat retina.Vision Research, 1969,9, 1345–1355.
Stroud, J. M.The moment function hypothesis. M.A. thesis, Stanford University, 1948.
Stroud, J. M. The fine structure of psychological time. In H. Quastler (Ed.),Information theory in psychology. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press, 1955.
Townsend, V. M. Loss of spatial and identity information following a tachistoscopic exposure.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,98, 113–118.
Treisman, A. M. Contextual cues in selective listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,12, 242–248.
Treisman, A. M., Russell, R., &Green, J. Brief visual storage of shape and movement. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. London: Academic Press, 1975.
Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Turvey, M. T. On peripheral and central processes in vision.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 1–52.
Turvey, M. T. Visual processing and short-term memory. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5). Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1978.
Turvey, M. T., &Kravetz, S. Retrieval from iconic and memory with shape as the selection criterion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 171–172.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C.Short-term visual information forgetting, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leiden, The Netherlands, 1978.
Vassilev, A., &Mitov, D. Perception time and spatial frequency.Vision Research, 1976,16, 89–92.
Von Wright, J. M. Selection in immediate visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,20, 62–68.
Wade, N. J. Some perceptual effects generated by rotating gratings.Perception, 1974,3, 169–184.
Wassle, H., Levick, W. R., &Cleland, B. G. The distribution of the alpha type of ganglion cells in the eat’s retinaJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1975,159,419–4377.
Westheimer, G. The Maxwellian view.Vision Research, 1966,6, 669–682.
Whitten, D. N., &Brown, K. T. The time courses of late receptor potentials from monkey cones and rods.Vision Research, 1973,13, 107–135. (a)
Whitten, D. N., &Brown, K. T. Photopic suppression of monkey’; rod receptor potential, apparently by a cone-initiated lateral inhibition.Vision Research, 1973,13, 1629–1658. (b)
Whitten, D. N., &Brown, K. T. Slowed decay of the monkey’s cone receptor potential by intense stimuli, and protection from this effect by light adaptation.Vision Research, 1973,13, 1659–1667. (c)
About this article
Cite this article
Coltheart, M. Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 183–228 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204258
- Stimulus Duration
- Durable Storage
- Visible Persistence
- Iconic Memory
- Partial Report