Abstract
In each of three experiments, confusability between members of a parafoveally exposed pair of letters affected accuracy of identifying the peripheral, but not the central, letter. Confusability was determined from a confusion matrix developed for each subject. In Experiment 1, only one letter in each pair was identified on each exposure, and the position of pair members was varied over trials while the absolute position of the pair was held at a constant distance from fixation. In Experiment 2, both letters were identified on each exposure. In Experiment 3, the criterion letter was presented at a constant distance from fixation, and both letters were identified on each exposure. Since results in Experiment 3 were the same as in Experiments 1 and 2, the effect cannot be explained with reference to an interaction between confusability and acuity. The implications of the findings for various models of visual information processing are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banks, W. P., Bachrach, L. M. &Larson, D. W. The asymmetry of lateral interference in visual letter identification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22,232–240.
Banks, W. P., Larson, D. W., &Prinzmetal, W. Asymmetry of visual interference.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 447–456.
Bjork, E. L., &Murray, J. T. On the nature of input channels in visual processing.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 472–484.
Chastain, G. Asymmetric identification of parafoveal stimulus pairs: Feature perturbations or failure in feature extraction?Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1981,35, 13–23.
Chastain, G., &Lawson, L. Identification asymmetry of parafoveal stimulus pairs.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,26, 363–368.
Estes, W. K. Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 278–286.
Estes, W. K. Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 53–60.
Estes, W. K. Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982,8, 353–382.
Krumhansl, C. L. Naming and locating simultaneously and sequentially presented letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 293–302.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Thomas, E. A. C. Effect of level of confusability on reporting letters from briefly presented visual arrays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 269–279.
Shim Ron, J., &Navon, D. The distribution of information within letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 483–491.
Townsend, J. T. Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 40–50.
White, M. J. Feature-specific border effects in the discrimination of letter-like forms.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,29, 156–162.
Wolford, G. Perturbation model for letter identification.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 184–199.
Wolford, G., &Shum, K. H. Evidence for feature perturbations.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 409–420.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chastain, G. Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs. Perception & Psychophysics 32, 576–580 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204213
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204213