Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 244–250 | Cite as

The Rawdon-Smith illusion

  • Walt Jesteadt
  • David M. Green
  • Craig C. Wier
Article
  • 331 Downloads

Abstract

A loudness illusion is described which was originally reported by Rawdon-Smith and Grindley (1935). It is analogous to the Craik-O’Brien-Cornsweet brightness illusion. Procedures are described for generating and measuring the size of the effect, and data are presented showing factors that influence its magnitude. Other examples are discussed that suggest that this effect is a very general phenomenon.

Keywords

Test Stimulus Psychometric Function Transition Range Noise Burst Acoustical Society ofAmerica 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anstis, S. M. Visual adaptations to gradual changes of intensity.Science, 1967,155, 710–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arend, L. E., Buehler, J. N., &Lockhead, G. R. Difference information in brightness perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 367–370.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, F. W., Howell, E. R., &Robson, J. G. The appearance of gratings with and without fundamental Fourier component.Journal of Physiology, 1971,17, 17–18.Google Scholar
  4. Cornsweet, T. N.Visual perception. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Craik, K. J. W.Visual adapration. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1940.Google Scholar
  6. Crovitz, H. F. Perceived length and the Craik-O’Brien allusion.Vision Research, 1976,16, 435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, M., &Whiteside, J. A. Human brightness perception near sharp contours.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971,6, 530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elmasian, R., &Galanbos, R. Loudness enhancement: Monaural, binaural, and dichotic.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975,58, 229–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garner, W. R. A technique and a scale for loudness measurement.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1954,26, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Irwin, R. J., &Zwislocki, J. J. Loudness effects in pairs of tone bursts.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 189–192.Google Scholar
  11. Jesteadt, W., Grren, D. M., &Wier, C. C. Auditory analog to the Craik-O’Brien-Cornsweet illusion in vision.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,59, S83(A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Land, E. H., &McCann, J. J. Lightness and retinex theory.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971,61, 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackay, D. M. Lateral inhibition between neural channels, sensitive to texture density?Nature, 1973,245, 159–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Brien, V. Contour perception, illusion and reality.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1958,48, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ratliff, F.Mach bands’ Quantitative studies on neural networks tn the retina. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1965.Google Scholar
  16. Rawdon-Smith, A. F., &Grindley, G. C. An illusion in the perception of loudness.British Journal of Psychology, 1935,26, 191–195.Google Scholar
  17. Risset, J. C. Pitch control and pitch paradoxes demonstrated with computer-synthesized sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969,46, 88(A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schouten, J. R., Ritsma, R. J., &Cardozo, B. L. Pitch of the residue.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962,34, 1418–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shepard, R. N. Circularity in judgments of relative pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Socity of America, 1964,36, 2346–2353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sherwood, S. L. (Ed.)The nature of psychology A selection of papers, essays and other writings by the late Kenneth J. W. Craik. Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  21. Shiffman, H., &Crovitz, H. F. A two-stage model of brightness.Vision Research, 1972,12, 2121–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevens, J. C., &Hall, J. W. Brightness and loudness as functions of stimulus duration.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 319–327.Google Scholar
  23. Walker, J. T. A new rotating gradient disk: Brightness, flicker, and brightness after effects.Vision Research, 1974,14, 223–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walt Jesteadt
    • 1
  • David M. Green
    • 1
  • Craig C. Wier
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of PsychophysicsHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations