Abstract
The differential propensity of fixated line stimuli to fragment and disappear from view was studied as a function of the gravitational orientation of the stimuli. The propensity to fragment was measured in terms of three intercorrelated dependent variables: the number of fragmentations per fixation period, the total duration of fragmentation per fixation period, and the latency to the first fragmentation. Unlike some anisotropic visual phenomena, which may reflect orientation-independent aspects of pattern perception, the observed anisotropy of propensity to fragment can be attributed overwhelmingly to the retinal orientation of the stimuli. Accordingly, this property of fragmentation need nof be ascribed to higher order aspects of pattern perception.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appall E. S. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin. 1972,78, 266–278.
Attneave, F., &Olson, R. Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1967,74, 149–157.
Attneave, F., &Reid, K. W. Voluntary control of frame of reference and slope equivalence under head rotation.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1968,78, 153–159.
Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., &Levinson, J. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.Journal of Physiology. 1966,187, 427–436.
Campbell, F. W., &Maffei, L. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system.Journal of Physiology. 1970,207, 635–652.
Coltheart, M., &Cooper, C. M. The retinal reference of the tilt aftereffect.Perception & Psvchophvsics, 1972,11. 312–324.
Corballis, M. C, &Beale, I. L. Bilateral symmetry and behavior.Psychological Review. 1970,77, 451–464.
Cosgrove, M. P., Schmidt, M J., Fulgram, D. D., &Brown.R. Stabilized images: Dependent variable specificity of pattern effects with prolonged viewing.Perception & Psvchophvsics. 1972,11, 398–402.
Craig, E. A., &Lichtenstein, M. Visibility-invisibility cvcles as a function of stimulus-orientation.American Journal of Psychology. 1953,66, 554–563.
Day, R. H., &Wade, N. J. The reference for visual normalization.A merican Journal of Psychology. 1969,82, 191–197.
Denney, D., &Adorjani, C. Orientation specificity of visual cortical neurons after head tilt.Experimental Brain Research. 1972,14, 312–317.
Donderi, D. C. &Kane, E. Perceptual learning produced by common responses to different stimuli.Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1965,19, 15–40.
Ellis. S. R. Investigations of the orientation-constancy of two usual aftereffects. Doctoral dissertation. McGill University. 1974.
Ferree, C. E., Rand, G., &Hardy, C. An important factor in space perception in the peripheral field of vision.American Journal of Psychology. 1933,45, 228–247.
Findilay, J. M., &Parker, D. M. An investigation of visual orientation constancy using orientation-specific properties of acuity and adaptation.Perception. 1972,1, 305–313.
Gibson, J. J. Adaptation with negative after-effect.Psychological Review. 1937,44, 222–244.
Gibson, J. J., &Radner, M. Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast m the perception of tilted lines. 1.Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1937,20, 453–467.
Hebb, D O. The semiautonomous process: Its nature and nurture.American Psychologist. 1963,18, 16–26.
Higgins, G. C, &Stultz, K. Visual acuity as measured with various orientations of a parallel-line test object.Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1948,38, 756–758.
Howard, I. P., &Templeton, W. B.Human spatial orientation. New York Wiley. 1966
Horn, G., &Hill, R. M. Modifications of receptive fields of cells in the visual cortex occurring spontaneously and associated with body tilt.Nature. 1969,221, 186–188.
Horn, G., Stechler, G., &Hill, R. M. Receptive fields of units in the visual cortex of the cat in the presence and absence of bodily tilt.Experimental Brain Research, 1972,15, 113–132.
Jung, R., Kornhuber, H. H., &De Fonseca, J. S. Multtsensory convergence on cortical neurons.Progress in Brain Research and Brain. Mechanisms. 1963,1, 207–234.
Lennie, P. Head orientation and meridional variations in acuity.Vision Research. 1974,14, 107–111.
Luria, S. M. The effect of body position on meridional variations in scotopic acuity.American Journal of Psychology, 1963,76, 598–406.
Maffei, L., &Campbell, F. W. Neurophysiological localization of vertical and horizontal visual coordinates in man.Science, 1970,167, 386–387.
Mansfield, R. J. W. Neural basis of orientation perception in primate vision.Science. 1974,186, 1133–1135.
Miller, E. F., II. Counterrolling of the human eyes produced bv head tilt with respect to gravity.Acta Oto-luryngology, 1962,54, 479–501.
Millodot, M., &Lamont, A. Refraction of the periphery of the eye.Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1974,64, 110–111.
Mitchell, D. E., &Blakemore, C. The site of orientation constancy.Perception, 1972,1, 315–320.
Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., &Westheimer, G. Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity tor interference fringes on the retina.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967,57, 246–249.
Ogilvie, J. C, &Taylor, M. M. Effect of orientation on the visibility of line wires.Journal of the Optical Society’ of America. 1958,48, 628–629.
Prentice, W. C. H.,&Beardslee, D. C. Visual “normalization” near the vertical and horizontal.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950,40, 355–364.
Prichard, R., Heron, W., &Hebb, D. O. Visual perception approached by the method of stabilized images.Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1960,14, 67–77.
Riggs, L. A., &Schick, A. M. L. Accuracy of retinal image stabilization achieved with a place mirror in a tightly fitting contact lens.Vision Research. 1968,8, 159–169.
Schmidt, M. J., Cosgrove, M. P., &Brown, D. R. Stabilized images: Functional relationships among populations of orientation-specific mechanisms in the human visual system.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 389–392.
Schmidt, M. J., Fulgram, D. D., &Brown, D. R. Stabilized images. The search for pattern elements.Perception A Psychophysics, 1971,10, 295–299.
Schwartzkroin, P. A. The effect of body tilt on the directionality of units in the cat visual cortex.Experimental Neurology, 1972,36, 598–606.
Silny. F. G., & Kushnir, S. L. Effects of lateral body tilt on visibility-invisibility cycles as a function of stimulus orientation. Undergraduate honors thesis. Psychology Department. McGill University. 1971.
Taylor, M. M. Visual discrimination and orientation.Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1963,53, 763–765.
Troxler, D. Über das Verschwinden gegebener Gegenstande innerhalb unsers Gesichtskreises.Ophthalmologisches Bibliothek (Himly and Schmidt. Eds., Jena). 1804,2, 51–53.
Wade, N. J. Effect of prolonged tilt on visual orientation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,22, 423–439.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in Experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author was supported by a grant from the National Research Council of Canada (No. A 7891) to Dr. Ronald Melzack during the conduct of this experiment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellis, S.R. Fragmentation of fixated line stimuli as a function of gravitational orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 17, 601–606 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203976
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203976