Abstract
Block capital letters were displayed to experienced and inexperienced Ss, using a 20 x 20 matrix of vibratory tactors placed against the back. In two separate experiments, a total of five modes of stimulus presentation, three of them employing a linear scanning slit, were studied. The poorest method, stationary flashing of the letter, allows performance that is well above chance, implying that a purely spatial presentation does convey information. Performance is improved when the letter is moved horizontally across the display. The best performance is achieved when the amount of simultaneous stimulation is limited by using a linear scanning slit. In one method, the letter moves behind a stationary slit, with the result that its horizontal dimension is portrayed only in time. In the other two methods, the scanning slit moves across the stationary letter, portraying the letter both in time and in space. The results of all five display modes indicate that Ss can use whichever representation, spatial or temporal, is available, although patternings which most closely approximate sequential tracing by a single moving point lead to the highest recognition accuracy. We interpret these results in terms of the limited spatial resolution of the cutaneous sense. While the perception of a letter presented in either full-field condition is limited by the spatial resolution, the best measure being the two-point limen, the perception of a letter traced sequentially is limited by the localization acuity of the cutaneous sense, the best measure being the “error of localization,” which is known to be considerably smaller than the two-point limen. Inasmuch as the slit methods of presentation are a compromise between simultaneous and sequential display, letter-recognition accuracy is better with slit presentation than with the corresponding full-field mode of display.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, T. R., &Sleight, R. B. Accuracy of tactual discrimination of letters, numerals and geometric forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology; 1952,43, 239–247.
Bach-V-Rita, P.Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Baer, J. A., & Hill, J. W. Optical-to-tactile image conversion for the blind. Final Report, Stanford Research Institute, Contract SRS 70-42 and Grant 14-P-55296/9-02, Menlo Park, California, 1972.
Beauchamp, K. L., Matheson, D. W., &Scadden, L. A. Effect of stimulus-change method on tactile-image recognition.Perception & Motor Skills, 1971,33, 1067–1070.
Bliss, J. C., & Crane, H. D. Experiments in tactual perception. NASA Contractor Report NASA CR-322, November 1965 prepared by Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, under Contrast NAS 2–1679.
Bliss, J. C., Crane, H. D., &Link, S. W. Effect of display movement on tactile pattern perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 195–202.
Bliss, J. C., Crane, H. D., Mansfield, P. K., &Townsend, J. T. Information available in brief tactile presentations.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 273–283.
Boring, E. G. The two-point limen and the error of localization.American Journal of Psychology, 1930,42, 446–449.
Boring, E. G.Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1942.
Collins, C. C. Tactile television—;echanical and electrical image projection. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 1970, MMS-11, 65-71.
Collenbach, K. M. A comparative study of the errors of localization on the fingertips.American Journal of Psychology, 1932,44, 327–331.
Dinnerstein, A. J., &Wolfe, M. Tactile slit scanning of letters.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1962,15, 135–138.
Eskildsen, P., Morris, A., Collins, C., &Bach-Y-Rita, P. Simultaneous and successive cutaneous two-point thresholds for vibration.Psychonomic Science, 1969,14, 146–147.
Hays, W. L.Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1963.
Hill, J. W., &Bliss, J. C. Modeling a tactile sensory register.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 4, 91–101.
Jenkins, W. L., &Stone, L. J. Recent research in cutaneous sensitivity: II. Touch and the neural basis of the skin senses.Psychological Bulletin, 1941,38, 69–91.
Linvill, J. G., &Bliss, J. C. A direct translation reading aid for the blind.Proceedings of Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers, 1966,54, 40–51.
Scadden, L. A. Perception of patterned vibratory stimulation: An evaluation of the tactile vision substitution system. Doctoral thesis, University of the Pacific, 1971.
Taenzer, J. C. Some psychophysical limitations on reading performance. Technical Report No. 4828-4, Solid-State Electronics Laboratory, Stanford Electronics Laboratories, Stanford University, 1971.
Taenzer, J. C. An information processing model for visual and tactile reading.Perception, 1972,1, 147–160.
Weinstein, S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses. Springfield, III: Thomas, 1968.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Zigler, M. J. The experimental relation of the two-point limen to the error of localization.Journal of General Psychology, 1935, 13, 316–331.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Grant 14-P-55282 from the Social and Rehabilitation Service, and by National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship F02 MH51765-01 PS to the author. A report of some of these results was given in a paper delivered at the Western section meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology held in Vancouver, B.C., in September 1972.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loomis, J.M. Tactile letter recognition under different modes of stimulus presentation. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 401–408 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203960
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203960