Abstract
Using a brightness-discrimination task similar to that employed by Bernstein, Proctor, Proctor, and Schurman (1973), masking functions were obtained in two experiments. In Experiment I, test stimulus (TS) and mask stimulus (MS) energies were held constant but luminance and duration were varied reciprocally. The obtained masking functions, plotted as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), were of an essentially identical U shape. This suggests that (a) SOA is a more suitable measure of delay than interstimulus interval, and (b) Bloch’s law holds for the requisite discrimination. In Experiment II, TS luminance and MS luminance were varied independently. This was to see whether the MS served as a frame of reference at short SOA, as suggested previously (Bernstein et al, 1973). The results were that this was, in fact, the case and that the transition from comparative to absolute judgment strategies as SOA increases is a major contributor to U-shaped masking functions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, I. H., Proctor, R. W., Proctor, J., &Schurman, D. L. Metacontrast and brightness discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 293–297.
Eriksen, C. W., Collins, J. F., &Greenspon, T. S. An analysis of certain factors responsible for nonmonotonic backward masking functions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,75, 500–507.
Fehrer, E., &Smith, E. Effect of Luminance ratio on masking.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1962,14, 143–147.
Hake, H. W., Rodwan, A., &Weintraub, D. Noise reduction in perception. In K. R. Hammond (Ed.),The psychology of Egon Brunswik. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.
Granit, R.Receptors and sensory perception. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955.
Kahneman, D. An onset-onset law for one case of apparent motion and metacontrast.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,2, 577–584.
Kahneman, D. Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking.Psychological Bulletin, 1968,69, 494–425.
Lefton, L. A. Metacontrast: A review.Perception & Psychophysics. 1973,13, 161–173.
Luce, R. D. Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1963.
Rodwan, A. S., &Hake, H. W. The discriminant function as a model for perception.American Journal of Psychology, 1964,77, 380–392.
Schurman, D. L. Predictive validity of a Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Text of a model of masking for form.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 183–186.
Wwisstein, N. A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Simultation of metacontrast.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 494–521
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein, I.H., Proctor, R.W., Belcher, J. et al. An analysis of U-shaped metacontrast. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 329–336 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203951
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203951