Abstract
In two experiments, Ss rated the difference in heaviness between two objects varying in both size and weight. Assumption of the subtractive model and the use of factorial designs allow separation of judgmental effects from psychophysical processes. Difference ratings were rescaled by monotone transformation to fit the subtractive model, yielding scale-free values for the size-weight combinations. The subtractive model provided a good description of the difference ratings, but critical violations of the additive model for the size-weight illusion were obtained. The experiments illustrate how ordinal information can be used to differentiate additive from multiplicative processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. Averaging model applied to the size-weight illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 1–4.
Anderson, N. H. Cross-task validation of functional measurement.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 389–395.
Birnbaum, M. H. The nonadditivity of personality impressions.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1974,102, 543–561.
Birnbaum, M. H. Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 89–96.
Birnbaum, M. H., Kobernick, M., &Veit, C. T. Subjective correlation and the size-numerosity illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 537–539.
Birnbaum, M. H., Parducci, A., &Gifford, R. K. Contextual effects in information integration.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,88, 158–170.
Birnbaum, M. H., &Veit, C. T. Judgmental illusion produced by contrast with expectancy.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 149–152.
Birnbaum, M. H., &Veit, C. T. Scale convergence as a criterion for rescaling: Information integration with difference, ratio, and averaging tasks.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 7–15.
Huang, I. The size-weight illusion and tke “weight density illusion.”Journal of General Psychology, 194533, 65–84.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, R, &Tversky, A.Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Kruskal, J. B. Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society [B]. 1965,27, 251–263.
Kruskal, J. B., &Carmone, F. J. Monanova, A. Fortran IV program for monotone analysis of variance.Behavioral Science, 1969,14, 165–166.
Parducci, A. Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis. In E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Rule, S. J., &Curtis, D. W. Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 305–309.
Shanteau, J. C., &Anderson, N. H. Test of a conflict model for preference judgment.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1969,6, 312–325.
Sjöberg, L. Sensation scales in the size-weight illusion.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1969,10, 109–112.
Stevens, J. C., &Rubin, L. L. Psychophysical scales of apparent heaviness and the size-weight illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 225–230.
Stevens, S. S., &Galanter, E. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 377–411.
Tversky, A. Intransitivity of preferences.Psychological Review, 1969.76, 31–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The first author received support from a National Institute of Mental Health postdoctoral fellowship at the Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego, which provided additional assistance through Grant MH 15828. Further support was provided by National Science Foundation Grant GB-21028; computing funds were supplied by Campus Computing Network, University of California, Los Angeles.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birnbaum, M.H., Veit, C.T. Scale-flee tests of an additive model for the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 276–282 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203942
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203942