Abstract
The method of average error was used with a mixed design to measure the horizontal-vertical illusion (HVI) for 40 Ss. Six stimulus configurations (⌊, ⌋,⊢, ⊣, ⊥, +) were combined with seven angular orientations of the upright standard, and on each trial the variable horizontal was adjusted to appear equal to the standard in length. Results showed that for no stimulus configuration did the vertical orientation of the standard yield the greatest illusion. The magnitude of the HVI was dependent upon the stimulus configuration, upon the orientation of the standard, and upon an interaction between these variables. For the ⊥ and +, equal inclinations of the standard to either side of the vertical yielded equal effects; for the other figures, asymmetrical effects were produced. The results are discussed in relation to the perspective theory of visual illusions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begelman, D. A., &Steinfeld, G. An investigation of several parameters of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 539–543.
Cormack, E. O. Effects of tilt of the upright in the horizontal-vertical illusion. Unpublished paper, New Mexico Tech, 1969.
Cormack, E. O., & Cormack, R. H. Interaction between stimulus configuration and line orientation in the horizontal-vertical illusion. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Denver, May 1971.
Finger, F. W., &Spelt, D. K. The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Journal &Experimental Psychology, 1947,37, 243–250.
Gardner, W., &Long, R. I. Errors of the standard and illusion effects with the inverted-T.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1960a,10, 47–54.
Gardner, R. W., &Long, R. I. Errors of the standard and illusion ettbcts with L-shaped figures.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1960b,10, 107–109.
Gregory, R. L.Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. Pp. 131–163.
Künnapas, T. M. An analysis of the “vertical-horizontal illusion”.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955a,49, 134–140.
Künnapas, T. M. Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955b,50, 168–170.
Künnapas, T. M. The vertical horizontal illusion in artificial visual fields.Journal of Psychology, 1959,47, 41–48.
Morinaga, D., Noguchi, K., &Ohishi, A. The horizontal-vertical illusion and the relation of spatial and retinal orientations.Japanese Psychological Research, 1962,4, 25–29.
Over, R. Explanations of geometrical illusions.Psychological Bulletin, 1968,70, 545–562.
Pearce, D., &Matin, L. Variations of the magnitude of the horizontal-vertical illusion with retinal eccentricity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 241–243.
Pearce, D. G., &Taylor, M. M. Visual length as a function of orientation at four retinal positions.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1962,14, 431–438.
Pollock, W. T., &Chapanis, A. The apparent length of a line as a function of its inclination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952,4, 170–178.
Shipley, W. C., Nann, B. M., &Pennfield, M. J. The apparent length of tilted lines.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949,39, 548–551.
Tedford, W. H., Jr., &Tudor, L. L. Tactual and visual illusions in the T-shaped figure.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 199–201.
Thiery, A. Ueber geometrisch-optische Tauschungen.Phil. Stud., 1896,12, 67–125. Cited byBoring, E. G.Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1942. P. 245.
Underwood, B. J.Experimental psychology. (2nd ed.) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 68–98.
Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology. (rev.) New York: Holt, 1954. P. 418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors are grateful to Kathy Branch and Chris Buys for their critical reading of this paper. Errors which remain are, of course, not their responsibility.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cormack, E.O., Cormack, R.H. Stimulus configuration and line orientation in the horizontal-vertical illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 208–212 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203930
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203930