Abstract
Studies of tachistoscopic word perception were reviewed under two theoretical headings: the structural approach, in which the variables of interest are linguistic relations among letters, and the lexical approach, where the interest is in the availability of words in lexical memory. The results of a recent tachistoscopic recognition study question the importance of lexical availability by finding no difference in performance between meaningful words and well-structured, pronounceable nonwords. In the present study, further comparisons between words and pronounceable nonwords were performed, and a meaningfulness effect was demonstrated. The generality of this finding was discussed, and alternative models accounting for the effect were considered. Two of these were capable of explaining structural effects as well as the meaningfulness effect: a translation model and a lexical discrimination net.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aderman, D., & Smith, E. E. Expectancy as a determinant of functional units in perceptual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 117–129.
Baron, J. Successive stages in word recognition. In S. Dornic and P. M. A. Rabbitt (Eds.),Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, in press.
Baron, J., & Thurston, I. An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 4, 207–228.
Bjork, E. L., & Estes, W. K. Letter identification in relation to linguistic context and masking conditions. Memory & Cognition, 1973, 1, 217–223.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 335–359.
Feigenbaum, E. A. The simulation of verba] learning behavior. In E. A. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman (Eds.),Computers and thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 627–635.
Gibson, E. J. Learning to read. Science, 1965, 148, 1066–1072.
Gibson, E. J., Bishop, C. H., Schiff, W., & Smith, J. Comparison of meaningfulness and pronunciability as grouping principles in the perception and retention of verbal material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 67, 173–182.
Gibson, E. J., Osser, H., & Pick, A. D. A study of the development of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 142–146.
Gibson, E. J., Pick, A., Osser, H., & Hammond, M. The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of words. American Qurnal of Psychology, 1962, 75, 554–570.
Gibson, E. J., Shurcliff, A., & Yonas, A. Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects. In H. Levin and J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies on reading. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
Hintzman, D. L. Explorations with a discrimination net model for paired-associate learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1968, 5, 123–162.
Kintsch, W. Abstract nouns: Imagery versus lexical complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1972a, 11, 59–65.
Kintsch, W. Notes on the structure of semantic memory. In E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972b.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Massaro, D. W. Perception of letters, words, and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 100, 349–353.
Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1965a, 1, 13–32.
Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. Tables of trigram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1965b, 1, 33–78.
Morton, J. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 165–178.
Newbigging, P. L. The perceptual redintegration of frequent and infrequent words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961, 15, 123–132.
Paivio, A., & O’Neill, B. J. Visual recognition thresholds and dimensions of word meaning. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970, 8, 273–275.
Pierce, J. Some sources of artifact in studies of the tachistoscopic perception of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 363–370.
Postman, L., & Rosenzweig, M. R. Practice and transfer in the visual and auditory recognition of verbal stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 1956, 69, 209–226.
Reicher, G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 274–280.
Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Milliken, J. A. Homographie entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 487–494.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. Homographie entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1971a, 10, 57–62.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1971b, 10, 645–657.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 99–118.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Gardner, G. T. Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 93, 72–82.
Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Smith, E. E., & Spoehr, K. T. The perception of printed English: A theoretical perspective. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum Press, 1974.
Smith, F.Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
Spoehr, K. T. Linguistic processes in the perception of letter strings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1973.
Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. Perceptual units and parsing processes in word perception. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Convention of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, 1972.
Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5, 71–89.
Tulbing, E., & Gold, C. Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 319–327.
Wheeler, D. D. Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 59–85.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is grateful to Jonathan Baron, Paul G. Matthews, and Edward E. Smith for helpful discussion and for commenting on preliminary versions of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manelis, L. The effect of meaningfulness in tachistoscopic word perception. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 182–192 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203272
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203272