Abstract
By spacing 10 stimuli (white noise) between 40 and 110 dB according to two criteria [equal response ambiguity (ERA) and equal discriminability (ED)], an attempt was made to construct an “ideal” case for magnitude estimation and category rating. The “ideal” case is defined by linear and constant Weber functions (SDs as a function of scale values) for the two scales, respectively. Altogether, three group and two individual magnitude and category rating experiments were run with these two spacings. It was found that the ERA spacing approximated the ideal case well for both Weber functions and the ED spacing only for the Weber function of the category scale. The general psychophysical differential equation that relates scale values and Weber functions for the two scales allowed good prediction of the category scales from the magnitude scales and the Weber functions. The data suggested a distinction between phenotypic (empirical) and genotypic Weber functions, analogous to “real” and “ideal” cases in physics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attneave, F.Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Henry Holt, 1959.
Eisler, H. Similarity in the continuum of heaviness with some methodological and theoretical considerations. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960, 1, 69–81.
Eisler, H. Empirical test of a model relating magnitude and category scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1962a, 3, 88–96.
Eisler, H. On the problem of category scales in psychophysics. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1962b, 3, 81–87.
Eisler, H. A general differential equation in psychophysics: Derivation and empirical test. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1963a, 4, 265–272.
Eisler, H. How prothetic is the continuum of smell? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1963b, 4, 29–32.
Eisler, H. Magnitude scales, category scales and Fechnerian integration. Psychological Review, 1963c, 70, 243–253.
Eisler, H. On psychophysics in general and the general psychophysical differential equation in particular. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1965a, 6, 85–102.
Eisler, H. The connection between magnitude and discrimination scales and direct and indirect scahng methods. Psychometrika, 1965b, 30, 271–289. Eisler, H., Holm, S., & Montgomery, H. Is the general psychophysical differential equation an approximation? Report from the Psychological Laboratories, University of Stockholm, No. 386, 1973.
Eisler, H., & Ottander, C. On the problem of hysteresis in psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 530–536.
Garner, W. R., & Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgments. Psychological Review, 1951, 58, 446–459.
Helm, C. E., Messick, S., & Tucker, L. R. Psychological models for relating discrimination and magnitude estimation scales. Psychological Review, 1961, 68, 167–177.
Luce, R. D., & Galanter, E. Discrimination. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1963.
Montgomery, H. Direct estimation effects of methodological factors on scale type. Göteborg Psychological Reports, 1971, 1, No. 9.
Siegel, W. Memory effects in the method of absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 94, 121–131.
Siegel, J. A., & Siegel, W. Absolute judgment and paired-associate learning. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 300–316.
Stevens, J. C. Stimulus spacing and the judgment of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 246–250.
Stevens, S. S., & Galanter. E. H. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 377–411.
Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley, 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Swedish Council for Social Science Research. Free computer time was made available by the Swedish Office for Rationalization and Economy. We are indebted to Björn Koch, Maria Backlund, and Ivar Paulson for experimental and computational assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eisler, H., Montgomery, H. On theoretical and realizable ideal conditions in psychophysics: Magnitude and category scales and their relation. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 157–168 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203269
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203269