Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 293–302 | Cite as

Saccadic localization of visual targets by the very young human infant

  • Richard N. Aslin
  • Philip Salapatek


The direction, latency, and form of the 1- and 2-month-old human infant’s saccadic eye movements toward peripheral targets were investigated. Infants of both ages reliably executed a directionally appropriate first saccade toward a peripheral target introduced as far as 30 deg from the line of sight along the horizontal and both diagonal axes, but only to 10 deg along the vertical axis. The presence of a second target in the central visual field reduced the probability of peripheral target localization. A significant inverse relation was found between target distance from the line of sight and probability of initiating a directionally appropriate saccade. Electro-oculography revealed that latency to first saccade, although highly variable, was less than 500 msec on a significant proportion of trials. Unlike the adult, the first saccade to target was grossly hypometric and was followed by one or more saccades of approximately equal amplitude to the first.


  1. Alpern, M. Effector mechanisms in vision. In J. W. Khng and L. A. Riggs (Eds.),Woodworth and Schlosberg’s Experimental psychology, (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971. pp. 369–394.Google Scholar
  2. Bach-Y-Rita, P., &Collins, C. C.The control of eye movements. New York. Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Bartz, A. E. Eye movement latency, duration, and response time as a function of angular displacement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 318–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartz, A. E. Fivation errors In eye movements to peripheral stimuliJournal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,75, 444–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, W. The control of eye movements in the saccadic system. In J. Dichgans and E. Bizzi (Eds.),Cerebral control of eye movement and motion perception. A symposium held in conjunction with the 251h International Congress on Physiological Science, Munich, 1971.Bibhotheca Ophthalmologica. 1972,82, 233-243Google Scholar
  6. Becker, W., &Fuchs.A. F. Further properties of the human saccadic system Eye movements and correction saccades with and without visual fixation points.Vision Research, 1969,9, 1247–1258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, E. K. Perception of form by, the human infant.Psychological Bulletin, 1972,77, 225–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davson, H.The physiology of the eye. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. Davton, G. O., &Jones.M. H. Analysis of characteristics of fivation reflex in Infants by use of direct current electrooculography.Neurology, 1964,14, 1152–1156.Google Scholar
  10. Dichgans, J., & Bizzi, E. (Eds.) Cerebral control of eye movements and motion perception Symposium held in conjunetion with the 25th International Congress on Physiological Sciences Munich. 1971Bibliotheca Ophthalmologica, 1972,82, 1-403Google Scholar
  11. Grunin, R., &Mostofsky, D. I. Eye movement: A bibliographic survey.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968,26, 623–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, P., &Macfarlane, A. The growth of the effective visual field from birth to seven weeks.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,18, 340–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kessen, W, Haith, M., &Salapatek, P. Infancy. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Carmiehael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed.) New York: Wiley. 1970. Pp. 287–446.Google Scholar
  14. Kessen, W., Salapatek, P., &Haith, M. The visual response of the human newborn to linear contour.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972,13, 9–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Komoda, M. K., Festinger, L., Phillips, L. J., Duckman, R. H., &Young, R. A. Some observations concerning saccadie eye movements.Vision Research, 1973,13, 1009–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leushina, L. I. On estimation of position of photostimulus and eye movements.Btofizaka, 1965,10, 120–136.Google Scholar
  17. Mann, I.The development of the human eye. New York: Giune and Stration, 1964.Google Scholar
  18. McLauglin.S. C. Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements,Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 359–362.Google Scholar
  19. Rashbass, C. The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movementsJournal of Physiology, London, 1961,159, 326–338.Google Scholar
  20. Salapatek.P. Visual scanning of geometric figures by the human newboth.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 247–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salapatek, P., &Kessen, W. Visual scanning of triangles by the human newborn.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966,3, 155–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saslow, M. Lateney for saccadic eye movement.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967,57, 1030–1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Siechier, G., &Latz, E. Some observations on attention and atousal in the human infant.Journal el the American Academy of Child Psychiatrists, l966,5, 517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lodd, T. W., Beecher, H., Williams, G. H., &Todd, A. W. The weight and growth of the human eyeballHuman Biology, 1940,12, 1–20.Google Scholar
  25. Lronick, E. Stimulus control and the growth of the infant’s effective visual field.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 373–376.Google Scholar
  26. Fronick, E., &Clanton, E. Infant looking patterns. Vision Research, 1971,11, 1479–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weber.R. B., &Daroff, R. B. The memos ot normal human saccadic eye movements.Vision Research, 1971,11, 921–928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Westheimer, G. Mehanism of saccadic eye movements.Archives of Ophthalmology, 1954,52, 710–724.Google Scholar
  29. Wheeless, L., Boynton, R., &Cohen, G. Eye-movement responses to step and pulse-slop stimuli.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1966,56, 956–960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White, C. T., Eason, R. G., &Bartlett, N. R. Latency and duration of eye movements in the horizontal plane.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1962,52, 210–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilmer, H. A., &Scammon, R. E. Growth of the components of the human eyeball.Archives of Ophthalmology. 1950,43 599–619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ames. E. W.. & Silfen, C. K. Methodological issues in the stud) of age differences in infant’s attention to stimuli varying in movement and complexity. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Minneapolis. Minnesota. 1965.Google Scholar
  33. Mundy-Castle. A.. & Anglin, J. M. Looking strategies in infants. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Santa Barbara. California, 1969.Google Scholar
  34. Salapatek. P. The visual investigation of geometric pattern by the one and two month old infant. Paper presented at meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Boston. December 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard N. Aslin
    • 1
  • Philip Salapatek
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Child DevelopmentUniversity of MinnesotaMinncapohs

Personalised recommendations